posted on Feb, 21 2012 @ 08:48 PM
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by Wookiep
I don't know much about the delegates either, but maybe they are waiting until you know the actual delegate count concludes and then they will release
their true facts. Not some polls to make a last place candidate feel good.
As mentioned before the DailyPaul is just as if not more bias than the MSM.
edit on 21-2-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)
Actually there is a very big difference in having a delegate count being released by the MSM and being released by the Paul campaign. I am inclined to
believe these numbers and this is why.....
The MSM releases numbers and calls them "projections". This is a legal term. It means the numbers they are releasing is a guess. If they reported
these numbers and called it the actual delegate count and not a projection, they could be found guilty in a court of law for any number of charges for
reporting false information as fact. These is TONS of case law on this issue. So by reporting the delegate count as a "projection" the network can
legally say anything it wants at all. It does not have to be true because they admit it may not be accurate by calling it a "projection".
Now the same would also hold true for the Paul Campaign. By releasing these numbers, any other Candidate can sue them and this could even possibly
result in criminal charges as well. The Paul campaign will have to show evidence that this is, by their records, an accurate delegate count.
If you want to know how true this report is, just watch what happens. If there are no fast immediate legal actions taken against the Paul Campaign,
then you will know it is a truthful count.
edit on 21-2-2012 by MrWendal because: (no reason given)