It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sharpenmycleats
Originally posted by Still
Originally posted by Sharpenmycleats
This whole mess is an infringement on every US Citizen. The government should not be mandating anything on anyone. Sad that it takes organized religion to stand up to our government instead of the people.
What is being mandated on anyone?
Really, did you not read the post? Have you read anything, watched any television. It's called health insurance. 30 million American's that currently do not have it are being told to get it. Employers are being told to provide it. Seems like a mandate to me. The onky thing I find more ridiculous than the question is that people starred your post. Good Grief!
Originally posted by Still
I cannot find contraceptive plans being included with insurance in any Catholic bible.
In fact I have seen and asked more than once exactly what religious freedom is being trampled and I have yet to see a factual answer.
Originally posted by Still
If you run a Catholic business and you cover my birth control in my insurance plan, how are you not able to practice your religion?
Originally posted by Still
This is not a Catholic society.A hospital is not a church. That is just the ugly truth of it.
Originally posted by Shoonra
I think the biggest violation of religious rights is that Non-Catholic faculty and staff (and students) of Notre Dame are being forced to adhere to Catholic teachings regarding birth control in the privacy of their own homes.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Catholics believe that Onanism is a sin. You know that very well. Their beliefs in both sin and contraception/abortion have been plastered all over this site. Example - EWTN sues Obama Admin And you have seen threads like these many times.
Liar
Asked and answered a dozen times already.
See the opening post at EWTN sues Obama admin.
Go back and re-read. You already have that answer given to you ... over and over and over
Originally posted by Still
It's a Church hospital. part of the Church. You've been told that.
YOU ARE JUST TROLLING.
It's not hyperbole, it is an attack on freedom of religion.
They cannot well up and declare that funds going toward birth control are needed for protecting child molesters so they must use hyperbole like saying that this bill is a direct opposition to freedom of religion.
only churches and not church institutions like schools. Also consider insurance companies and their owners. If a quarter of the country is Catholic, it's reasonable to conclude that this plan will require a quarter of insurance executives to write policies that are morally repugnant. Why force them to surrender their consciences and make them do something contrary to their religion?
Nevermind that churches are exempt,
The Church knows that it is required to buy a policy, and because of that policy contraception and abortifacients will be made available. And the insurance company gets its money from premiums they charge places like the churches.
or that religious institutions who elect to not pay for this can now declare that the insurance company for it.
Do we decide constitutional issues by majority vote of those involved?
Nevermind that a vast majority of the actual employees in discussion here are in favor of the bill.
Sure, nobody has ever questioned that. It's not part of the Church's argument.
Nevermind the fact that employees can of course still decide to not use birth control.
No, the facts are important and should be faced.
Nevermind the facts altogether.
You have no evidence to support that and it has no effect on whether it's constitutional or not.
Makes you wonder why the only ones complaining are the far right and the church officials. The ones who have to pay.
- This has nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with being greedy. It's actually a sacrilege to guise this issue as an attack on Catholicism.
So, no Church employee has ever had proper health insurance? No, they're "crying" because for the first time ever, the government is telling the Church that it must actively do something that is against its central tenets and beliefs. An attack on religion. Why the change? What crucial government policy must be implemented that is more important than the First Amendment?
Call it what it is. It's a bunch of church officials crying because they would have to pay for their employees to have proper health insurance.
Originally posted by charles1952
So, no Church employee has ever had proper health insurance? No, they're "crying" because for the first time ever, the government is telling the Church that it must actively do something that is against its central tenets and beliefs. An attack on religion. Why the change? What crucial government policy must be implemented that is more important than the First Amendment?
So, apparently, no state requires what Obama is trying for.
Currently, 28 states have laws requiring contraceptive coverage as part of health plans. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 20 of those states offer some type of exemption, a list including Arizona, New York, Maryland, Missouri and California.
Whether exemptions exist or not, Catholic groups in all 28 states can avoid the contraceptive mandate in one of three ways, says the U.S. bishops' conference. These include self-insuring prescription drug coverage, dropping that coverage completely or opting into a federal law that preempts any state mandates. Critics say the narrowness of the recent federal ruling would block religious groups from taking any of these avenues.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Still
***** Update on the 28 States Issue ****** Catholic Bishops Reject Argument *****
Hey Still. "Still" around? (I crack myself up sometimes.)
I found the Bishops' answer to the 28 state argument in this article ncronline.org...
So, apparently, no state requires what Obama is trying for.
Currently, 28 states have laws requiring contraceptive coverage as part of health plans. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 20 of those states offer some type of exemption, a list including Arizona, New York, Maryland, Missouri and California.
Whether exemptions exist or not, Catholic groups in all 28 states can avoid the contraceptive mandate in one of three ways, says the U.S. bishops' conference. These include self-insuring prescription drug coverage, dropping that coverage completely or opting into a federal law that preempts any state mandates. Critics say the narrowness of the recent federal ruling would block religious groups from taking any of these avenues.
With respect,
Charles1952
thinkprogress.org...
But as NPR’s Julie Rovner reports this morning, Christian affiliated groups already offer coverage for contraception in 28 states, eight of which don’t include the kind of conscience protections that are part of the administration’s proposed regulation:
But while some insist that the rules, which spring from last year’s health law, break new ground, many states as well as federal civil rights law already require most religious employers to cover prescription contraceptives if they provide coverage of other prescription drugs. (Emphasis added)