It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by artistpoet
We can pick a wildflower or leave it in the meadow.
We can help an old person carry their heavy shopping or not
Originally posted by artistpoet
We continually have choice yet all outcomes are known - not always by us but by Higher Intelligence
Originally posted by circlemaker
Randomness is order we don't understand yet. Like magic is to science. I think it's more a matter of perspective than a question of whether or not it exists.
Originally posted by artistpoet
reply to post by an0maly33
Sorry my answers are confusing perhaps I am confused
But I would stand by the sentance you quoted
"We continually have choice yet all outcomes are known - not always by us but by Higher Intelligence"
Higher Intelligence or source is something many can not accept but for me it is a basic foundation.
Keep digging you are certainly raising interesting points
Originally posted by an0maly33
Originally posted by circlemaker
Randomness is order we don't understand yet. Like magic is to science. I think it's more a matter of perspective than a question of whether or not it exists.
You get it.
Originally posted by rom12345
The concept of randomness is only really relevant in the context of predictability, which inherently requires a conscious sampling of a system at a particular point in time. Chaos theory, and the study of dynamical systems, has shown us that complex systems are extremely sensitive to initial conditions, so small changes to a system, make their progression completely unpredictable...
Originally posted by an0maly33
Originally posted by rom12345
The concept of randomness is only really relevant in the context of predictability, which inherently requires a conscious sampling of a system at a particular point in time. Chaos theory, and the study of dynamical systems, has shown us that complex systems are extremely sensitive to initial conditions, so small changes to a system, make their progression completely unpredictable...
From a practical standpoint, I would agree, but again, the given assumption of the premise is that all factors and rules are known by an omnipotent observer. Those small changes you mentioned would be moot. Whatever the conditions may be, this super-being/machine would know how to calculate the progression.
You said randomness is only relevant to predictability of a sampled system. That's true, but what if you're not sampling? If the fundamental laws, properties, and variables of a system are known, does that mean that the course of all aspects of that system can be calculated? Or is there something truly unknowable and unpredictable that would influence the flow?
Originally posted by artistpoet
reply to post by andersensrm
And what is this super being/machine? Perhaps it is all of our consciuosness, all of matter, all of everything. What if each particle, had a "mind of its own" so to speak, and each one was connected so there was perfect communication between all particles of matter and consciousness.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think yes we are all in essence a part of something greater - Yet only a fraction of it
Even the Universe our technology percieves is a fraction of it also - is what I believe.
edit on 10-2-2012 by artistpoet because: typo
Originally posted by an0maly33
Originally posted by rom12345
The concept of randomness is only really relevant in the context of predictability, which inherently requires a conscious sampling of a system at a particular point in time. Chaos theory, and the study of dynamical systems, has shown us that complex systems are extremely sensitive to initial conditions, so small changes to a system, make their progression completely unpredictable...
You said randomness is only relevant to predictability of a sampled system. That's true, but what if you're not sampling? If the fundamental laws, properties, and variables of a system are known, does that mean that the course of all aspects of that system can be calculated? Or is there something truly unknowable and unpredictable that would influence the flow?
Originally posted by an0maly33
I was thinking the other day - just pondering on the way home to work. I got the idea that our reality has a sort of fate to it. Nothing esoteric, spiritual, etc. Think of it like this. At the big bang, There was some set of energy/material that behaved according to some physical law. Imagine that the way the particles and energy interacted could technically be calculated - as in "this particle exerts x force on the adjacent paricles" etc on an effectively infinite scale.
Let's assume you were a being with the mental capacity or had a machine with the computing power to account for every single one of those particles and energy properties and interactions. Could you not extrapolate the way in which the universe would unfold?
Our universe (reality) is potentially a result of a fixed and predictable set of variables. Nothing is random. Even in the computing world we have random number generators that are "good enough", much in the same way that an atomic clock is "good enough" at keeping time. But is anything REALLY random? Is there REALLY such thing as chance?
I think everything we experience, everything we think, everything we do can all be traced back down the line to the initial set of circumstances - particle arrangement/amount, energy types/strengths, motion vectors, etc at the creation of our universe.
Assuming this is the case, our future must also be a function of this. Even if you read this post and you make a conscious decision to do something out of the ordinary - that will be a function of me writing this post, which is a function of me being part of this non-random reality. At the point of the big bang, the being/machine I mentioned earlier would have predicted that in a few billion years someone would think up this idea and post it on the internet, causing you to make a change in your life that you believe would be breaking with the mold that had already been cast. Ultimately, any decisions we make, even if they seem to stray from the norm, are already a predictable function of the reality around us unfolding.
I'm very interested in exploring these ideas and would love to hear your ideas or contentions with what I propose.edit on 10-2-2012 by an0maly33 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NeoSoul
Random - Φ
Φ = 1.61803399