It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Years from now we will look back on people like you
Shifting Attitudes about Same-Sex Marriage
The new poll finds that about as many adults now favor (45%) as oppose (46%) allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally. Last year opponents outnumbered supporters 48% to 42%. Opposition to same-sex marriage has declined by 19 percentage points since 1996, when 65% opposed gay marriage and only 27% were in favor.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Annee
Years from now we will look back on people like you
Here we go again,
The holier than thou attitude,
May 25, 2010 Americans' Acceptance of Gay Relations Crosses 50% Threshold Increased acceptance by men driving the change by Lydia Saad PRINCETON, NJ - Americans' support for the moral acceptability of gay and lesbian relations crossed the symbolic 50% threshold in 2010. At the same time, the percentage calling these relations "morally wrong" dropped to 43%, the lowest in Gallup's decade-long trend. Gallup's annual Values and Beliefs survey, conducted each May, documents a gradual increase in public acceptance of gay relations since about 2006. However, the change is seen almost exclusively among men, and particularly men younger than 50. www.gallup.com...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (Pub.L. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419, enacted September 21, 1996, 1 U.S.C. § 7 and 28 U.S.C. § 1738C) is a United States federal law that defines marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman. The law passed both houses of Congress by large majorities and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 21, 1996.
Under the law, no U.S. state or other political subdivision of the U.S. may be required to recognize as a marriage a same-sex relationship considered a marriage in another state. Section 3 of DOMA codifies the non-recognition of same-sex marriage for all federal purposes, including insurance benefits for government employees, Social Security survivors' benefits, and the filing of joint tax returns. This section has been found unconstitutional in two Massachusetts court cases and a California bankruptcy court case, all of which are under appeal. The Obama administration announced in 2011 that it had determined that Section 3 was unconstitutional and, though it would continue to enforce the law, it would no longer defend it in court. In response, the House of Representatives undertook the defense of the law on behalf of the federal government in place of the Department of Justice (DOJ).
When the DOJ later argued that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional, New York archbishop Timothy Dolan, wrote that it would "precipitate a national conflict between church and state of enormous proportions".[1]
Section 2. Powers reserved to the states No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
Section 3. Definition of marriage
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
Americans' Acceptance of Gay Relations Crosses 50% Threshold
Results are based on telephone interviews with 1,029 national adults, aged 18 and older, conducted May 3-6, 2010. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones (for respondents with a landline telephone) and cellular phones (for respondents who are cell phone only).
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
Nothing wrong with wishful thinking. But here is how it stands right now.
Gay rights is progressing in most places in the world - - not just in America.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
You're really going to use the same poll as that other guy?
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Annee
Gay rights is progressing in most places in the world - - not just in America.
If you're right I predict a disaster in the making.
Whether it be 20 - 30 years from now or 100 years
Society will look back on "people like you" and realize the error in their ways.
All laws allowing gay marriage will be reversed and society will try to heal all the damage that was done due to all this politically correct poppycock.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
These types of issues are not new to society. It may be somewhat knew to our current Western civilization. But the fact is that these issues have been a part if life all throughout human history. It always ends the same. The homosexuals will reach a certain peak of acceptance in society and finally society rebels due to the serious problems that occurred.
It's a cycle of acceptance and it promotes apathy. Therefore degradation of society and an out pouring of growing problems which demand a strict policy to fix them. You want to talk about childish ..... well yes, homosexuals eventually become the rebellious children of society, demanding they get what they want when they want it. Finally , it becomes too much and the parents must take back the responsibility for the better good of the family.
Check your history before making claims, might help with the image a bit.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by lordtyp0
Check your history before making claims, might help with the image a bit.
Check "your" history....... who's story ?
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
These types of issues are not new to society. It may be somewhat knew to our current Western civilization. But the fact is that these issues have been a part if life all throughout human history. It always ends the same. The homosexuals will reach a certain peak of acceptance in society and finally society rebels due to the serious problems that occurred.
It's a cycle of acceptance and it promotes apathy. Therefore degradation of society and an out pouring of growing problems which demand a strict policy to fix them. You want to talk about childish ..... well yes, homosexuals eventually become the rebellious children of society, demanding they get what they want when they want it. Finally , it becomes too much and the parents must take back the responsibility for the better good of the family.
en.wikipedia.org...
Section 2. Powers reserved to the states No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
I would like to just ask two questions......in regards to the current Federal laws of the United States
en.wikipedia.org...
Section 2. Powers reserved to the states No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
Do you agree that it should be left up to individual States to decide?
Should it be Federal law and all States be required to acknowledge same-sex marriage without that States decision?
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Substitute "religious extremists" in place of "homosexuals", and then your statement is more accurate.