It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Shortly before his death he had been named vice president of sales at a startup that sold energy-efficient lighting.
A recent U.S. government study has found large quantities of chemicals in the river and its tributaries—pollutants that are known to cause sex change in animals.
These chemicals, from both residential and industrial sources, may be linked to the unnatural fish, says the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) report from Dec. 2006.
During a 2003 survey of the Potomac River and the Cacapon River of West Virginia, Chambers and his colleagues found large numbers of intersex fish.
The researchers also found chemicals from pesticides and flame retardants as well as fragrances commonly found in products such as soaps, antiperspirants, and deodorants.
NationalGeographics
"We focused on shrimp because they are common and important in the food chain, but serotonin is also linked to behavioral changes in other species, including fish," Ford said.
“Crustaceans are crucial to the food chain. And if shrimps’ natural behavior is being changed because of antidepressant levels in the sea, this could seriously upset the natural balance of the ecosystem,” lead researcher Alex Ford said in a university.
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by Mimir
Wait...shrimp on prozac are intentionally offing themselves? And we're feeding this to millions of citizens worldwide?
Excuse me for a minute... :bnghd:edit on CMondayam414123f23America/Chicago06 by Starchild23 because: (no reason given)
actually they're too laid back and think hey, you look like a friend. :p
seriously one day it is my hope that someone will record what we have done, in an easy to read and understand format, step by step how we ended up creating mankind's demise.
Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
Pleased we are on the same wavelength here. Healthy minds being preyed upon. Read my post, the first one. In particular this piece.
Shortly before his death he had been named vice president of sales at a startup that sold energy-efficient lighting.
A vice president of a poor mind? Nope. But low and behold energy-efficient lighting. Yes lighting. It doesnt say bulbs for the record.
Strange. Cant say much more for fear of straying off topic.
In relation to the thread, how much of what we pass ends in the sea? and is this where prozac stems from?
Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
Thats what i was thinking. So where is the prozac coming from?
2nd
Originally posted by Mimir
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
It's not a phnomenon affecting all coasts in the worlds, but something that occurs near cities that leek it with the sewerwater instead of cleaning the water for pharmaceutical traces, but it is spreading in the waters so larger areas will slowly get affected. I do agree that this may not be the greatest danger we're facing as a species and if those shrimps has to die...it's good they are on prozac so they die happy.
edit on 6-2-2012 by Mimir because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
I can't help but sit back and reflect for a moment on the absurdity of anti-depressents. To understand first of all you need to know why people get depressed in the first place. It's usually because something isn't going well in a persons life, they're not happy, or whatever it may be. It can all be traced back to an individual's environment and how it effects them psychologically. So in my opinion if you want to treat depression you have to change that persons environment, not give them a magic pill. This is perhaps the biggest fraud ever, and why was this done you ask? In the name of PROFIT. All problems we face today can be traced back to the the monetary system, capitalism, and the concept of money, I kid you not, probably just about every single one of them.edit on 6-2-2012 by RadioactiveRob because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
Thats what i was thinking. So where is the prozac coming from?
2nd
or is it even prosac. if we look at what has happened to the sea that provides enough tons of harmful waste the one thing that practically jumps out at you is the gulph spill and chems they used on that.
To mimic conditions in the wild, scientists exposed the estuary-dwelling shrimp Echinogammarus marinus to the antidepressant fluoxetine at levels detected in average sewage-treatment waste. Fluoxetine is the key ingredient in the drugs Prozac and Sarafem. NationalGeographics
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
I can't help but sit back and reflect for a moment on the absurdity of anti-depressents. To understand first of all you need to know why people get depressed in the first place. It's usually because something isn't going well in a persons life, they're not happy, or whatever it may be. It can all be traced back to an individual's environment and how it effects them psychologically. So in my opinion if you want to treat depression you have to change that persons environment, not give them a magic pill. This is perhaps the biggest fraud ever, and why was this done you ask? In the name of PROFIT. All problems we face today can be traced back to the the monetary system, capitalism, and the concept of money, I kid you not, probably just about every single one of them.edit on 6-2-2012 by RadioactiveRob because: (no reason given)
although that can be true in short term cases, chronic depression due to brain chemical imbalances are not a mere nuisance, they are very real and you can't just smile them away.
Chemical imbalance is one hypothesis about the cause of mental illness. Other causes that are debated include psychological and social causes.
According to critics, the chemical imbalance hypothesis has been overpromoted and continues to be advanced as factual by pharmaceutical companies. They believe the general population and many journalists have accepted this hypothesis into their understanding of mental illness uncritically.[11] They have pointed to the lack of an established chemical balance (without which, they claim, the notion of an "imbalance" is meaningless). Certain pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer continue to promote drugs like Zoloft with advertisements asserting that mental illness may be due to chemical imbalances in the brain, and that their drugs work to "correct" this imbalance.[12] Most academics believe that the advertisements are oversimplified and don't fully explain what is happening.[13]