Originally posted by daryllyn
Surely you aren't new to ATS... Sources are highly...ummmmmm.... encouraged. That is the one thing that sets us apart from the rest.

'wait and see' and 'I'm not the only one that has figured this out' do not count as credible sources in my book.

Just sayin'...

The person is presenting an idea, theory.... they need no sources at all.
This is in skunk works and that means it's highly speculative.

No need to keep harping on about sources.

Hey here's an idea - we couild put tracking devices in our kids - like with some cars. That way we can leave them in all the hotel rooms we want. I jest...

If this was all a false flag operation in which we are supposed to sympathise and relate to the ordinary middle class Mccanns, why did Madeline not disappear in a second from a public place such as creche or beach in order to elicit maximum sympathy from the public?

Instead she vanished over the time that her parents left her at home alone to drink bottles of wine in a nearby restaurant that was not in view of the apartment, which they had done for a number of nights ie. they are largely to blame and do not elicit maximum sympathy. the false flag 'organisers' could have done much better in my opinion.


There is much more evidence to suggest the Mccanns did it ; Kate was an anesthesia specialist, Kate constantly checked the other children's breathing on night of disappearance, cadaver scent detected in apartment, Gerry disposes of fridge from apartment, Gerry airs out hire car for days in blazing sun and claims rotting meat is responsible for cadaver scent picked up by dogs, cadaver scent detected on Kate's clothes, holdall is missing from apartment, frenzied untraceable phone calls and texts night before 'kidnap', downstairs neighbour hears girl crying for hours night before 'kidnap', no physical evidence of break in, Kate refuses to answer 48 questions about her daughter, Kate and Gerry refuse to take part in reconstruction of events, Kate and Gerry never take part in search for their daughter, priest lends Mccanns key to private church and says the Mccanns 'betrayed him'.

The conspiracy around Madeline Mccann, is the one that her parents (and others) hatched in order to cover up her death. If she is ever found she will not be alive and enough time will have elapsed in order for any physical evidence to be degraded.

I spoke to a number of family friends over Christmas, non-ATS types, all of them said they would be keen to get their kids microchipped for tracking, "Look at what happend to Madeleine McCann" one said. I pointed out the dangers of microchipping i.e. Cancer (as occurs in microchipped animals) and giving others too much control and information; these concerns were quickly brushed aside

Originally posted by jameshawkingsIt's a Conspiracy 'Theory' so requires no source other than me. If you do a search for "Madeleine McCann Microchip Agenda" it would seem I'm not the first to figure this one out.

I think there should be more to a "theory" than a highly implausible and offensive thought that entered your head while under the influence (probably).

Originally posted by humphreysjim

Originally posted by jameshawkingsIt's a Conspiracy 'Theory' so requires no source other than me. If you do a search for "Madeleine McCann Microchip Agenda" it would seem I'm not the first to figure this one out.

I think there should be more to a "theory" than a highly implausible and offensive thought that entered your head while under the influence (probably).

Please back up your claim as to why it is "highly implausible"

Originally posted by jameshawkings

Originally posted by humphreysjim

Originally posted by jameshawkingsIt's a Conspiracy 'Theory' so requires no source other than me. If you do a search for "Madeleine McCann Microchip Agenda" it would seem I'm not the first to figure this one out.

I think there should be more to a "theory" than a highly implausible and offensive thought that entered your head while under the influence (probably).

Please back up your claim as to why it is "highly implausible"

edit on 19-1-2012 by jameshawkings because: (no reason given)

There's absolutely no evidence that it's true.

Your only possible bit of evidence is that it got a lot of media attention, and there's a much more logical reason for that. She's a cute, young, white girl, and it sells papers to people who get their kicks from reading about that kind of thing.

Originally posted by humphreysjim

Originally posted by jameshawkings

Originally posted by humphreysjim

Originally posted by jameshawkingsIt's a Conspiracy 'Theory' so requires no source other than me. If you do a search for "Madeleine McCann Microchip Agenda" it would seem I'm not the first to figure this one out.

I think there should be more to a "theory" than a highly implausible and offensive thought that entered your head while under the influence (probably).

Please back up your claim as to why it is "highly implausible"

edit on 19-1-2012 by jameshawkings because: (no reason given)

There's absolutely no evidence that it's true.

Your only possible bit of evidence is that it got a lot of media attention, and there's a much more logical reason for that. She's a cute, young, white girl, and it sells papers to people who get their kicks from reading about that kind of thing.

No evidence doesn't mean implausible. This fits in perfectly with the microchip agenda which most people around here are aware of, it's coming soon, the timing is perfect. If this is all just a coincidence then it's a blessing for the Globalist Bankers