It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by YeshuaPiso
Let's assume for a moment that in the Autumn of 2014, the people of Scotland vote to reclaim their independence thereby negating the Act of Union 1707.
What then will the Rest of the UK (RUK) re-name itself? This might seem at first glance to be a simple problem but when you actually break down the legalities of the current entity's name it becomes rather complicated.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland becomes ... what exactly?
Last week, during the Royal opening of the fourth Scottish Parliament, Salmond boldly told Her Majesty: Don’t worry, you’ll still be head of state when (not ‘if’, Alex doesn’t do hypotheticals) we become independent. It took me to remind everyone via my blog that SNP policy has actually, since 1997, been to hold a referendum during the first term of an ‘independent parliament’ on the question of ‘whether or not to retain the monarch as head of State for Scotland’.
Originally posted by YeshuaPiso
Originally posted by keldas
Well you could say Dis United Kingdom or DUK for short.
Or Albion or perhaps the United Kingdom of Albion.
Although I do like the name Britannia.
Albion - another old school suggestion.
Seems like Britannia might be the one though.
Originally posted by cassandranova
What I suspect would happen is that it would remain the UK, with the formal name being the United Kingdom of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Should NI leave, just England and Wales, still same name.