It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Bicent76
Iran has no way of threatning anyone else in the region except israel and saudi arabia. I have a hard time trying to understand why europeans and americans make such a big deal about some lunatic thousands of miles away as they also did with iraq TWICE!
Imminent threat from chemical/biological/nuclear material by saddam hussein, everyone rushed to deal with it and if you were against bush/cheney, then somehow you were against america and britain. People never stop to think for a moment about the corporate imperialist agenda of destroying nations so they can rebuild them and then install some puppet dictator to kiss western ass.
Ahjmendihad is a very stupid man that keeps digging and digging his own grave, but HOW the heck is he anymore of a threat TO THE REGION than an assad or gadafahi was? Israel does not like being called names and I don't blame them but they do tend to over-react and they are certainly too dependent on foreign assistance to be respected imo.
Originally posted by blackmirage0311
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Continue to be condescending; that's quite alright. Just because I command a squad doesn't mean I don't understand the strategic mindset and basic common sense; something you seem to lack. Next promotion and a PLC i'll have 40+ men + attachments under my command. I'd hate to see you with that responsibility. This seems to be too much for you to comprehend. I'll leave you and your expertise (LOL) to continue fear-mongering this thread as if nuclear tension has changed at all in the past 70 years.edit on 15-1-2012 by blackmirage0311 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
Yet more neo-con, pro-Israel nonsense from the armchair hawks on ATS.
I'll believe when I see it.
Where were those WMDs in Iraq? Oh right, there weren't any. Just oil.
Originally posted by blackmirage0311
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Thats Corporal to you, civvy.
And could you please enlighten all of us here on your vast knowledge of geopolitics? Do you know something no one here knows, or are you just making assumptions based on your fantasies of how this war will play out?
I'm not back tracking anything. No one would be retarded enough to launch "hundreds of nukes" lol
Like I said, 70 years and counting, nothing's changed. MAD has served its purposeedit on 15-1-2012 by blackmirage0311 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by Bicent76
Russians are prepared extensively for nuclear NBC scenario .
Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by Bicent76
Western investment in civil defence is dismal at best.
Russian strategy is based on chemical and tactical nukes for tactical purposes and biological and nuclear for strategic purposes.
Their biological arsenal is of chimera organisms,superplague etc.
By the time NATO starts its nuclear attack, 3/4 to 4/5 of its forces will be lost and most of the population dying and it will be potential extinction level event in the West.
edit on 15-1-2012 by ludwigvonmises003 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blackmirage0311
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Huh? I'm questioning your knowledge on it. You claim to be an expert. Care to answer my question or will you continue to be evasive?