It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Originally posted by hooper
Is Tom Hanks in on it now too?
Neck deep, my friend. T. Hanks has been in the conspiracy at least since the 'Apollo 13' farce. Those boys went to the moon and had to come back in a hurry, cuz of what they saw.
Tom Hanks is far up the illuminati power heirarchy. : |
Oh dear Lord, there's someone here who can't tell if your're being sarcastic or not. The end is near.
By the way, Sandra Bullock, too. And the director. And the producers. And the writers. And the co-stars. Hell, everyone is on it!!
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by defythetyrants
No. Actually in one of my responses to a post i specifically say i disagree with any attempt hollywood makes at gleaning capitol from tragic events in which hundreds of people perished.
So that pretty much puts almost all of human history off limits. People have made money and a living from telling stories for a very long time. Its kind of how we learn from one generation to another. Dramatization of tragic events helps, when done well, to put things in a more human perspective.
i can see where you are coming from with that hooper, but is it just and moral for already filthy rich celebrities to further their gains through the perpetuation of horrible events?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by defythetyrants
i can see where you are coming from with that hooper, but is it just and moral for already filthy rich celebrities to further their gains through the perpetuation of horrible events?
Not all are filthy rich. For all its supposedly liberal politics, Hollywood is a hotbed of free-market capitalism. If a celebrity (lets assume an actor for now) can't put butts in the theatre seats then they don't get hired. Tom Hanks is rich (I assume) because people think he is a good actor. It is probably some of the most honest wealth around because everyone kind of gets a say in who gets the big money.
Anyway, like I said, people have been making money telling stories for a very long time. Technology has now given us the ability to tell stories to millions of people at a time. That scale is what creates the wealth that you are talking about. It also allows for more people to share a common experience in a common way.
Also, please note that telling a story does not perpetuate the event. The event is over. It is simply a retelling.
And to an earlier point. It was not fully sarcastic. If you think these movies, television shows, etc. are all still part of a false flag, then that means some if not all of the participants must be "in on it".
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by defythetyrants
Well, it would be nice to think that they would give back to the families, but where do you start with that and where do you draw a line? Every crime show and movie dramatizes vicitimization in some form or another. I think one of the ways that we deal with some of these horrors is to talk about it. Whether on an individual level or on a social level like through movies, books, magazines, television, etc.
Besides, like I said, its free-market capitalism at its best. The movie has a chance of being a flop and instead of lining pockets it may end up making a few a little more empty.
Originally posted by defythetyrants
yes but considering the subject matter at hand it is almost certainly not going to flop, in fact it will probably accrue millions in gross ticket sales. wherein lies my concern, was the setting of 9/11, the greatest american tragedy to date, specifically chosen for the sole purpose of filling theatres? and if that IS the case then SHAME on all involved in the project. and yes the studio responsible for producing the film should, in my opinion, donate a generous sum to a foundation for the families of the victims or in some way donate money to said families.
Originally posted by Shermanator
reply to post by defythetyrants
You draw your line at the # of people killed? Or you think that hollywood, should NOT make a movie about anything tragic... hmmmm .... that's logical.
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Distrubing UNLESS all MONEY GOES TO THE FAMILIES OF THE LOST!!!!!!!
Originally posted by thejlxc
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Yeah. Just thousands of scientists and experts not paid off, coming forward to speak out, and cops, the thermite found in the dust now multi lab tested, and 9/11 victims families, and the many FOIA videos, and the london release of the collapse of building 7 before it happened with it still in the background behind the reporter, and the military stand down, and the money that way made, and the money that was lost suddenly not being important, and all those cases against the government being destroyed conveniently by the pentagon attack, and on and on.
Yep. Nothing at all. Just the Evidence I was thinking about.edit on 17-1-2012 by thejlxc because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thejlxc
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Thousands of scientists.
www.911truth.org...
It doesn't take more than controlling grants to shut up the scientific community. Plus a few dozens really bad apples. It's not much harder than paying off the media, because you control it buy paying for it? Like so many other in your face lies in plain sight that some people think of as "conspiracies".
This is recent, I grant you.
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
But once I understood all the dirty deals the day before 9/11, the already scripted TV coverage, the military stand down, and the police state suddenly being thrust on America, an inside job doesn't seem as unlikely, sadly. You think it's awesome to think this stuff? It's sad, but it gives one hope to see the truth and speak out when you can, while you can.
Oh, the OS? That it changed over and over?
That the guy who WROTE the 9/11 commission report said it was bogus?
That they don't help the 9/11 victims families and they don't support the brave men on the ground who are dying from the exposure while the government excludes them from the 9/11 ceremony?
Originally posted by thejlxc
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
That link I gave you for the thermite was from January 17th, this year. Not 2009. Just so ya know. It's the real deal there.
Ok I see where you're coming from now. I'm happy to know that the disbelievers are not in the majority they once were. Yeah, everything's peachy man. It wasn't scripted! Have a good life.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by defythetyrants
How do you feel about World War Two, or Vietnam, being used as a source for books and movies? Or how about Titanic? Or even the siege of Atlanta in Gone With the Wind? Genuinely interested.