It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gunshooter
Originally posted by Justaposter
reply to post by wrathchild
Maybe his birthday is late, my son just turned 15 and is in the 8th grade.
This is just so sad, my local news only has a few details, but did say they repeatedly asked him to drop his gun and he didn't.
This is a very sad story, and broke my heart just reading the few details that were out about it.
I don't know how your state works, but when I was 15, I was in tenth grade.
2nd
Originally posted by Communicationwillfreeus
Originally posted by DelMar
Sad story indeed and I feel bad for his parents and friends. But at 15, you should have enough sense to know that you will be shot if you engage the police with a weapon. Should he have been tasered, you asked. No.
If they repeatedly ask him to drop the gun then someone had time to take aim. Why did that person/officer take a kill shot if there was no direct hostages? Just sayin.
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
Originally posted by Communicationwillfreeus
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
Just read the link and I don't see anything sad about it, he had a gun, he was shot.
I wont be wasting any tears for him.
You are really young and just mouthing off or just really jaded to humanism. It is sad because of the people affected. The children around him will be forever haunted by this. The teachers who were there will be affected as will the officers. It is a very sad situation that this boy's life had come to the point of "suicide by cop." It would be sad for anyone to have their life turned to this moment. If you need anything else explained I am sure myself or some other good people here would love to help you out.
Better to be haunted by this than shot dead by a crazed idiot or worse, maimed... those "haunted" kids are still alive thanks to the cops.
Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by Communicationwillfreeus
Police don't shoot to injure, they shoot to kill.
That is why we have non-leathal weapons, so they do not have to kill. Once a police officer pulls his gun, if it goes off, it is meant to kill the criminal, not to stop them. Police know this, they train this way.
If they pull their guns and use them, someone dies.
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by Communicationwillfreeus
Originally posted by DelMar
Sad story indeed and I feel bad for his parents and friends. But at 15, you should have enough sense to know that you will be shot if you engage the police with a weapon. Should he have been tasered, you asked. No.
If they repeatedly ask him to drop the gun then someone had time to take aim. Why did that person/officer take a kill shot if there was no direct hostages? Just sayin.
Because real life isn't the movies; You never shoot to "warn"; "wound;scare or intimidate".
You shoot to"stop" immediately.
To prevent the loss of life.
Guns save lives.We don't have details ;possibly he pointed the gun at the officer or gave them some indication he was about to fire.
Originally posted by The GUT
Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by Communicationwillfreeus
Police don't shoot to injure, they shoot to kill.
That is why we have non-leathal weapons, so they do not have to kill. Once a police officer pulls his gun, if it goes off, it is meant to kill the criminal, not to stop them. Police know this, they train this way.
If they pull their guns and use them, someone dies.
That training is more to protect the officer and to instill the fact that deadly force is a last resort. It's not law. An officer should always be allowed their own judgment.
If you can't attempt to take down an armed, but NOT shooting 8th grader with some other means than a kill-shot, you just might be the type that wants to shoot somebody anyways.
Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by The GUT
I am in agreement, they should of used non-lethal force, however, I was not there, so do not know how it all went down.
Bottom line here is when a police officer tells you to drop whatever it is you have in your hand, be it a pen, or a gun, you best drop it.
Or you will end up dead.
Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by Communicationwillfreeus
Police don't shoot to injure, they shoot to kill.
That is why we have non-leathal weapons, so they do not have to kill. Once a police officer pulls his gun, if it goes off, it is meant to kill the criminal, not to stop them. Police know this, they train this way.
If they pull their guns and use them, someone dies.
Originally posted by 46ACE
reply to post by Communicationwillfreeus
UHM no(let's talk"reading comprehension" ): The unfortunate officer placed in the situation who was forced to fire on an adolescent will be "forever haunted" by the kids death at his hands.