It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wrathchild
being 15...
and in the 8th grade...hmmmm
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
Just read the link and I don't see anything sad about it, he had a gun, he was shot.
I wont be wasting any tears for him.
Originally posted by davidchin
Still, the police who shot the kid has to live with the death. But at least he and the rest of the police force, and the school faculty and students all get to go home to their families at the end of the day.
Originally posted by wrathchild[envolved/i]
reply to post by Communicationwillfreeus
I would think its quite rare for a police officer to want to impress his peers with his first kill.
Most police officers that are forced to take a life are usually removed from active duty until sufficient therapy is done.
I highly doubt that the officer who shot that young man is "high-five-ing" his buddies in the locker-room.
Originally posted by Communicationwillfreeus
Originally posted by 46ACE
reply to post by Communicationwillfreeus
UHM no(let's talk"reading comprehension" ): The unfortunate officer placed in the situation who was forced to fire on an adolescent will be "forever haunted" by the kids death at his hands.
Unless that officer was excited to get his first kill, then he may not be haunted by shooting a kid? "UHM no" you still aren't with me try again.
It was a sad situation that no one "deserved" to be a part of. I can't be any clearer than that.
Originally posted by wrathchild
I served as a "special constable" with the RCMP in the early 90's
I was allowed the use of the shotgun if any full member was in a life threatening situation..didnt come close to even touching it for 5 years.
Originally posted by DelMar
reply to post by Communicationwillfreeus
Probably because he pointed a weapon at a police officer. What would you prefer them to do?