ATS RECAP 05: Iran Ron Paul SEC Mi5, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 46 times


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 08:51 PM by Druid42
reply to post by gimme_some_truth



It was a 6:20 video, they increased the file size. Buffering hits a threshold, I'll comment again in a bit.


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 08:56 PM by bone13
reply to post by followtheevidence



Site manager, here, that monitor the replys to post, which may be read by U know who, there are twenty or so and the owners of ATS, back in the nintys it was people posting information on UFO's and the like, now it may HLS, putting questions up, like the FEMA camps and the like questions stated pre 9/11, my internet service was cut when i replyed to a post, asking will R.P. u know that one, will he stop the FEMA camps or stand in front with pencil and pad, checking people in, the ATS owners should keep WASHINGTON out of their clients opinions,(Members). knowlegde is to be shared, not denied, when the monitors, do there monitoring it might mean someone is doing or hiding something that they don't want found out, just remember no foul words, or talk about hurting or killing anyone, so why build camps to house one person, or maybe one dozen,
edit on 29-12-2011 by bone13 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 30-12-2011 @ 11:40 AM by EspyderMan
Originally posted by Druid42
I have to gather my thoughts for a moment.

Brian. YOU got IT this episode. Awesome job. That is your ATS persona. No other criticizes, (yet, subject to change) you have finally become the ATS recap dude. Love the attire, and the presentation, laid back, very informal, animated with lots of gesture, and bang on. I stared the first time, and drool ran from the corner of my mouth. Wow, I was thinking. Brian went beyond the simple newscast/thread recap, and made it his personal business. Yeah, Brian, your body language made it ring true. Throughout the 6:20, you had it nailed. Not too much, not too little. Balanced. Yes, Brian, you have it down.


To the Production crew:

Lot's of white screen. Pop in a few more pics. Slackers.

This episode weighed in at 6 minutes and 20 seconds. Others have been just under 5 minutes, so I note the attempt to increase the length (per request) past the five mark. As stated, the download size of the first four episodes was under 50 mb. This one weighs in at 58.6mb. Call the difference 10mb, for an extra 1:20.

Is that a good trade? I think not. You decide, as the production crew. The minute twenty isn't worth it. Keep it five, and just a wee bit beyond that.

Under six. Or smack on five thirty. Yeah. that should make a 53 mb download. Should stream fine as well.



The difference is trivial with a decent computer and connection. The problem lies in their technology useage. They are using much older compression then available today which makes their videos longer then most you see online. If the site upgraded they might get better quality for the size.
As for the ATS persona comment, I disagree wholeheartedly.

But I am 34, maybe younger members appreciate the act.


reply posted on 30-12-2011 @ 07:04 PM by Druid42
reply to post by EspyderMan



Well, I happen to be 43, and I think the delivery for this sort of content is appropriate. If you've already followed those threads, then good on ya mate. As was said earlier, this Recap series is geared towards the younger crowd, and newer members.

The best thing about it is: It's different. Honestly, do you want Walter Cronkite (RIP) reading the Recaps? Brian has tons more charisma than that.



They are using much older compression then available today which makes their videos longer then most you see online. If the site upgraded they might get better quality for the size. As for the ATS persona comment, I disagree wholeheartedly. But I am 34, maybe younger members appreciate the act.


Gee, you must be mistaken. I've been downloading the videos, and they come in a flash file, with the extension of .flv. The last time I checked, Flash was the latest standard. Name one with a better compression ratio to file size. Gee, I guess You Tube already figured that one out, huh?

Besides, the site is only hosting the video. The video is processed separately, then posted for viewing on the site afterwards. Personally, I think the current length/size is a pretty accurate description of the latest compression techniques.

But, we are all entitled to our opinions.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^