It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2012

page: 125
159
<< 122  123  124    126  127  128 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 1 2012 @ 04:49 PM
link   
reply to post by AnonymousCitizen
 


Thanks, your link didn't work for me. Does mine work for you?

NE Wyo Quake - USGS

I see it's reduced to 4.5 instead of 4.8

I phoned Gillette, Wyo an hour or more ago and they felt nothing.

Confirmed - quarry blasts are common SE of Gillette and normally are not listed as quakes because the miners are required to turn in blasts to USGS ahead of time.
edit on 1/5/2012 by Trexter Ziam because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 1 2012 @ 05:28 PM
link   
reply to post by AnonymousCitizen
 

and mb too, not ML, crikey thats equal to 85 tons of TNT



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 05:36 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


ya thats what i was thinking,,

enjoy


Explosions: 100 ton test detonation


www.youtube.com...


cool.



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 05:42 PM
link   
What about this little guy?

Magnitude 4.1 - Off the Coast of Baja
You'll notice that the historical seismicity shows no previous quakes in the vicinity. Very strange place to see a quake methinks?



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Magnitude 6.3 - Offshore Chiapas. Mexico


Location in Google Maps
  • Date-Time: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 @ 22:43:38 UTC
  • Earthquake location: 14.420°N, 92.969°W,
  • Earthquake depth: 44.0 km
  • Distances:
    67km (41mi) from Puerto Madero, Mexico
    82km (50mi) from Suchiate, Mexico
    90km (55mi) from Tapachula, Mexico
    92km (57mi) from Ciudad Tecun Uman, Guatemala
    265km (164mi) from Guatemala City, Guatemala
  • Event ID: usc0009gut

Derived from Event Data Source: USGS
Powered by QVSData



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 06:04 PM
link   
^ Vancouver Island quake 10 minutes later. West coast is heating up and I don't like it.



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Magnitude 4.5 - Vancouver Island. Canada Region


Location in Google Maps
  • Date-Time: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 @ 22:53:50 UTC
  • Earthquake location: 50.683°N, 129.454°W,
  • Earthquake depth: 16.0 km
  • Distances:
    143km (88mi) from Port Hardy, Canada
    308km (191mi) from Campbell River, Canada
    337km (209mi) from Courtenay, Canada
    362km (224mi) from Powell River, Canada
    506km (314mi) from Victoria, Canada
  • Event ID: at00m3d8xq

Derived from Event Data Source: USGS
Powered by QVSData



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 06:06 PM
link   
May is gearing up for a biggie!

But where?

Most of the activity in last 8 hours has been along the North American West Coast. Events getting larger as they move South.

Peru/Chile?

Very little happening elsewhere in comparison.
edit on 1-5-2012 by SpaceJockey1 because: added



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 06:09 PM
link   
Something is wrong here

www.emsc-csem.org...

They are saying 5.4 mb. That is way too much difference. Someone is wrong. I wonder who it might be????

Geofon 5.9

geofon.gfz-potsdam.de...

That sounds a better match to EMSC.

 

USGS phase data in


mb = 5.6 (343) ML = 6.0 ( 14) mblg = 5.2 ( 14) md = 0.0 ( 0) MS = 0.0 ( 0)


neic.usgs.gov...

6.3 Mw my foot.

 

USGS Moment tensor wphase in 6.0 Mw - watch it change

earthquake.usgs.gov...

 

CPP moment tensor 6.1 Mw
www.emsc-csem.org...

 

The Russians now have it - 6.1 mb :puz;
that does NOT make sense, but only on 7 stations so...

www.ceme.gsras.ru...

 

Never mind the Russians

GeoAzur SCARDEC just in. 6.0 Mw
geoazur.oca.eu...

 

And finally


Magnitude 6.0
Date-Time

Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 22:43:37 UTC
Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 05:43:37 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 14.466°N, 92.909°W
Depth 36.3 km (22.6 miles)
Region OFFSHORE CHIAPAS, MEXICO
Distances 93 km (57 miles) SW of Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
163 km (101 miles) WSW of Quetzaltenango, Guatemala
189 km (117 miles) WSW of Huehuetenango, Guatemala
861 km (535 miles) SE of MEXICO CITY, D.F., Mexico
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 16.8 km (10.4 miles); depth +/- 5.5 km (3.4 miles)
Parameters NST=500, Nph=515, Dmin=217.1 km, Rmss=1.13 sec, Gp= 58°,
M-type=(unknown type), Version=7
Source

Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0009gut


earthquake.usgs.gov...

edit on 1/5/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 07:05 PM
link   
I'll post my opinion when it comes up on SNZO.

LR wave should have arrived at 23 31 07, but LISS have yet to update since 23:18 UTC

it should look like a smaller version this one Chiapas 6.3

P wave and S waves are identical but the critical LR wave is a lot smaller height wise than the 6.3.
Hard to say 5.9 or 6.1 either way

LISS SNZO
need to find a similar 5.7 - 6.0 from the area, but my database of graphs is a bit limited.
edit on 1-5-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-5-2012 by muzzy because: added a link



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 08:18 PM
link   
Hm, no historical seismicity. Very unusual.


This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude 3.9
Date-Time

Wednesday, May 02, 2012 at 00:03:38 UTC
Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 08:03:38 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 51.987°N, 81.005°W
Depth 15 km (9.3 miles)
Region ONTARIO, CANADA
Distances 82 km (50 miles) NNW of Moosonee, Ontario, Canada
141 km (87 miles) SE of Attawapiskat, Ontario, Canada
165 km (102 miles) WNW of Waskaganish, Quebec, Canada
828 km (514 miles) NNW of OTTAWA, Ontario, Canada

earthquake.usgs.gov...

NRCan has this guy at 4.3 and more west of the southern part of the Hudson Bay, hm.
edit on 1/5/12 by murkraz because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 08:25 PM
link   
Weird little 3.9 in upper Ontario.

quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

Don't see these 'round these parts often.


Type: Earthquake
78 minutes ago
Magnitude: 3.9
DateTime: Wednesday May 2 2012, 00:03:38 UTC
Region: Ontario, Canada
Depth: 15 km
Source: USGS Feed


Ah, just beat me to it, Murkraz. But yes, very strange region. Fracking?

Love the thread by the way and will contribute as much as possible.
edit on 1-5-2012 by UFO1414 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 08:32 PM
link   
Don't even worry about it bud.

I can't see it being fracking way up there, but it could be. Seems pretty barren.



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 08:51 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


Too tired to check myself. Will wait for your data.

Lunar / Celestial page ready

'nite all.



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 09:38 PM
link   
Ha ha. I gave Puterman his ten thousandth star. Well, the last few as well.I'm like Monk. I like round numbers. No one give anymore. It must stay at a round number.

Wow. I live in Ontario and we got a quake. Actually, in Kenora we had a 1.7M that someone in town felt. We a long way away for James Bay so I don't think anything.

edit on 1-5-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 09:55 PM
link   
any chance that ottawa quake is connected to any of the diamond mines in the area?



posted on May, 2 2012 @ 01:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by UFO1414
Weird little 3.9 in upper Ontario.

quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

Don't see these 'round these parts often.


Type: Earthquake
78 minutes ago
Magnitude: 3.9
DateTime: Wednesday May 2 2012, 00:03:38 UTC
Region: Ontario, Canada
Depth: 15 km
Source: USGS Feed


Ah, just beat me to it, Murkraz. But yes, very strange region. Fracking?

Love the thread by the way and will contribute as much as possible.
edit on 1-5-2012 by UFO1414 because: (no reason given)


No fracking there
Only a open pit DeBeers Diamone mine 90 Km west of Attawapiskat, Ontario
I work there and we don't even fell it 3 km away

here the report not event close to the mine
www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca...
edit on 2-5-2012 by Trillium because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2012 @ 02:40 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 

EMSC definitely off the mark with this 22:43:34 Chiapas one at 5.3 now. It is mb, but still a bit low I think.
I seen Kermadec coming on late this afternoon so waited for the LISS to update before saving the graph.

According to EMSC the 16:37:59 quake at Guerrero was a bigger 5.5 (others have that one at 5.7), but on SNZO the trace is smaller than the Chiapas one

Na

I'm going for 5.9

edit on 2-5-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2012 @ 03:23 AM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 



EMSC definitely off the mark with this 22:43:34 Chiapas one at 5.3 now. It is mb, but still a bit low I think.


I am not sure why EMSC dropped from 5.4 to 5.3 and retained mb BUT they have revised and are now showing 6.0 Mw

www.emsc-csem.org...

LDEO are also showing 6.0 MW so that may have something to do with it!

www.ldeo.columbia.edu...



posted on May, 2 2012 @ 06:01 AM
link   
On the subject of planetary 'alignments' / conjunctions /oppositions or whateva 'ere is sum low down info on the effects of gravity and tides on our planet using the Moon as the benchmark (Moon=1)



It is a little disappointing really.
Not really much affect at all.In fact if ALL of those were on the same line the total is only 0.01701.

Then consider an 'alignment' where Jupiter is on the opposite side. The gravitational effect on us is reduced for 0.01 to 0.005 and that is a big chunk of that 0.01701 gone - in fact 0.005 of it leaving 0.01201

Sources: Harmonic Con(game)vergence and Planetart Alignments: Fact or Fiction

And if you are not sufficiently 'undoomed' yet you could try 2012 Hoax: Planetary Alignments from which I got the above links.

And finally:


The line at the top of each of the above graphs (roughly where the Venus spikes max out) corresponds to a tidal acceleration that is one ten-thousandth as strong as the Sun's average tidal acceleration on Earth (or over 20,000 times smaller than the tidal acceleration induced twice every day by the Moon). The low line on the graphs, close to the long-term average of the net planetary tide, is one one-hundred-thousandth of the average solar tide. So, as expected, the gravitational influence of the planets on the Earth is utterly insignificant. We're saved!


(Not sure which line is refereed to as I don't see one above the Venus spikes but the figures speak for themselves. No scale references so not easy to see what this is.)
The Influence of the Planets

But never mind. I shall still continue to collect the lunar and celestial data around the time of each Mag 6+, even if only so someone in the future can make use of it to prove a point. (Either way as the data is unbiased)



new topics

top topics



 
159
<< 122  123  124    126  127  128 >>

log in

join