Muslim girl gang who kicked young woman in the head while yelling 'kill the white slag' escape jai

TPTB are trying to foment a race-war! It's been obvious for a long time.

Compare:
- Emma West (tram lady), who is going to spend Xmas in jail and had her children stolen by the State for speaking mere words in public.
- These 4 Somali women who brutally beat an innocent person because of their race in public, who will probably walk free.

There is only one explanation for this: They are trying to anger indigenous Englanders... increasingly so. That is what the EDL is all about too.

Now I don't want my country colonised anymore than the next guy, but it's important to realise who is behind all of this. Treat the cause not the symptoms. Sever the hidden hand and not only does Europe get to be European again, but tax and debt slavery ends, education improves, Democracy returns... and so on.

All our woes are connected!

reply to post by christina-66


McNaughton Law is not relevant to this case, as that deals with matters of sanity.

In this case, the defence weren't arguing that the accused were ''temporarily insane'' because of drinking. The fact that they were uncharacteristically drunk was used as part of the argument for leniency in their sentencing.

This is what people don't seem to be understanding. They weren't ''let off' for being drunk. Their drunkenness was being used by the defence counsel in mitigation, as it is by just about every single defence lawyer who is representing a client who was under the influence of drink/drugs when they committed the crime.

I've already linked to numerous stories in the UK where people convicted of drunken assault are spared jail. This case is certainly not out-of-the-ordinary, and only makes headlines in certain news outlets because of the religion of the perpetrators.

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
reply to post by christina-66

 

McNaughton Law is not relevant to this case, as that deals with matters of sanity.

In this case, the defence weren't arguing that the accused were ''temporarily insane'' because of drinking. The fact that they were uncharacteristically drunk was used as part of the argument for leniency in their sentencing.

This is what people don't seem to be understanding. They weren't ''let off' for being drunk. Their drunkenness was being used by the defence counsel in mitigation, as it is by just about every single defence lawyer who is representing a client who was under the influence of drink/drugs when they committed the crime.

I've already linked to numerous stories in the UK where people convicted of drunken assault are spared jail. This case is certainly not out-of-the-ordinary, and only makes headlines in certain news outlets because of the religion of the perpetrators.

Name a similar case of white on muslim violence, where there was no jail sentence due to alcohol and people may be inclined to believe you,

reply to post by EvanB


Pity the botfriend wasn't a kick-boxing expert - if these animals carried permanent scars from this incident it may deter them from doing it again.

I think the judge got played here and was led by the balls between prison overcrowding and these animals playing the religion card. He's not worthy to be a judge.

Originally posted by McGinty
reply to post by EvanB

 

Pity the botfriend wasn't a kick-boxing expert - if these animals carried permanent scars from this incident it may deter them from doing it again.

I think the judge got played here and was led by the balls between prison overcrowding and these animals playing the religion card. He's not worthy to be a judge.

That why I wuv Pa(Pennsylvania). If this happened in Pa, the boyfriend would of been legally justified to use lethal force.

Originally posted by purplemer
and I dont take well to people making others not feel welcome in their own country.

Who cares?!

Others don't take kindly to being forced to welcome strangers into their country. Interesting how you say "their own country", indicating that ownership of a nation does belong to the majority ethnic group.

Anyhow... like I said, who cares? You've chosen your side, others theirs. Neither are going to change their viewpoint - you can't expect patriotic people to all of a sudden be okay with the dispossession of their ancestral homeland.

Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Twiptwop

 

As you did not do very well last time. Why dont you try and tell me again. This time within ATS terms and conditions what you think it means to be English...

Don't bother Twiptwop. Purplemer is one of those people who have been told again and again what Englishness is but simply refuses to accept the given answer because he/she doesn't like it. I've personally written at least 1 or 2 detailed replies to this poster detailing Englishness. Waste of my time.

There is surely no greater form of racism than to deny the existence of an entire ethnic group.

Originally posted by ollncasino
Where do you get off making excuses for a bunch of racist Somalis raining in kicks to a motionless body on the ground screaming "Kill the white slag"?

What are you babbling about ''making excuses'' ?

I am not offering any personal opinion on whether the sentencing was right or not. I am explaining that this case is not out of the ordinary in how it was dealt with, but is merely being twisted by racists and Islamophobes for their own sinister agenda.

Why are you even pretending that these Somali women are being treated differently because of their race ? You know that's a flat out lie.

Do I have to spoon feed some of you people everything ?

Here are a number of easily searchable cases where a white person, or someone with a ''British'' name escaped a custodial sentence after being convicted of racially assaulting a black or Asian person.

Racist escapes jail sentence

Father escapes prison for racist attack

Childminder escapes jail for racial assault on two-year-old

No jail for Grangetown woman after racist attack

Originally posted by korathin

Originally posted by McGinty
reply to post by EvanB

 

Pity the botfriend wasn't a kick-boxing expert - if these animals carried permanent scars from this incident it may deter them from doing it again.

I think the judge got played here and was led by the balls between prison overcrowding and these animals playing the religion card. He's not worthy to be a judge.

That why I wuv Pa(Pennsylvania). If this happened in Pa, the boyfriend would of been legally justified to use lethal force.

Lol..! That's taking it a little far.

Then again, one of those girls kicks to the head could easily have killed the Ms Page, so maybe that's not such a leap !?

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes

Originally posted by ollncasino
Where do you get off making excuses for a bunch of racist Somalis raining in kicks to a motionless body on the ground screaming "Kill the white slag"?

What are you babbling about ''making excuses'' ?

I am not offering any personal opinion on whether the sentencing was right or not. I am explaining that this case is not out of the ordinary in how it was dealt with, but is merely being twisted by racists and Islamophobes for their own sinister agenda.

Why are you even pretending that these Somali women are being treated differently because of their race ? You know that's a flat out lie.

Do I have to spoon feed some of you people everything ?

Here are a number of easily searchable cases where a white person, or someone with a ''British'' name escaped a custodial sentence after being convicted of racially assaulting a black or Asian person.

Racist escapes jail sentence

Father escapes prison for racist attack

Childminder escapes jail for racial assault on two-year-old

No jail for Grangetown woman after racist attack

edit on 7-12-2011 by Sherlock Holmes because: (no reason given)

How would you have sentenced these girls?

Originally posted by korathin
Name a similar case of white on muslim violence, where there was no jail sentence due to alcohol and people may be inclined to believe you,

I've already provided numerous examples of people being convicted of drunken assault who were spared jail sentences.

There is nothing to ''believe me'' about, because I am providing facts and evidence to prove my argument, while others are just relying on good, old-fashioned racism, islamophobia and xenophobia.

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Why are you even pretending that these Somali women are being treated differently because of their race ?

Do I have to spoon feed some of you people everything?

A gang of Muslims rain kicks at a motionless body while shouting "Kill the white slag!" and then you come on here justifying why they didn't get a custodial sentence.

Could you just stop trying to make exuses for the inexcusable?

Originally posted by McGinty
How would you have sentenced these girls?

While prison isn't always the best answer, I do feel that unprovoked violence against the person should be a mandatory custodial sentence. I think about a year or so in prison would be appropriate if they were of previous good character. I tend to favour harsher sentencing for repeat offenders.

Originally posted by Cythraul

Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Twiptwop

 

As you did not do very well last time. Why dont you try and tell me again. This time within ATS terms and conditions what you think it means to be English...

Don't bother Twiptwop. Purplemer is one of those people who have been told again and again what Englishness is but simply refuses to accept the given answer because he/she doesn't like it. I've personally written at least 1 or 2 detailed replies to this poster detailing Englishness. Waste of my time.

There is surely no greater form of racism than to deny the existence of an entire ethnic group.

It's fine. We'll see what side of the fence him and his ilk stand on one the people rise up, which we will invariably.

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes

I am providing facts and evidence to prove my argument, while others are just relying on good, old-fashioned racism, islamophobia and xenophobia.

So a group of Muslims kicking a white girl on the ground while shouting "Kill the white bitch!" isn't racist?

But of course, in your twisted politically correct view of the world, its racist, Islampohobic and xenophobic to point out that its is!!!

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
I've already linked to numerous stories in the UK where people convicted of drunken assault are spared jail.

Can you link to a case showing a group of white people kicking a motionless Muslim on the ground shouting "Kill the Muslim slag!" escaping a custodial sentence because the were drunk?








Thought not.

Originally posted by ollncasino
A gang of Muslims rain kicks at a motionless body while shouting "Kill the white slag!" and then you come on here justifying why they didn't get a custodial sentence.

Firstly, their religion is irrelevant.

Secondly, can you please get a semblance of logic in your argument. I am explaining why the lack of a custodial sentence is consistent with current procedures and sentencing guidelines in the UK.

I have provided a number of examples of similar cases where a drunk has escaped jail for a viscous assaults, and where a white person has been spared jail for a racial assault on a non-white.

Some judges are stricter than others, but the current onus is to find alternatives to custodial sentences when possible, due to the record high in the UK prison population. So there are more and more people convicted of assault who are being spared jail.

This case really isn't out of the ordinary.

Originally posted by ollncasino
Can you link to a case showing a group of white people kicking a motionless Muslim on the ground shouting "Kill the Muslim slag!" escaping a custodial sentence because the were drunk?

Can you link to a case showing a group of drunk white people kicking a motionless Muslim on the ground shouting "Kill the Muslim slag!" where they received a custodial sentence?

Thought not.

The only way your point could have any possible merit is if there has been a similar case which was treated differently in court. As, to my knowledge, there isn't, then your point is, er, pointless.

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes

Originally posted by ollncasino
A gang of Muslims rain kicks at a motionless body while shouting "Kill the white slag!" and then you come on here justifying why they didn't get a custodial sentence.

Firstly, their religion is irrelevant.

Secondly, can you please get a semblance of logic in your argument. I am explaining why the lack of a custodial sentence is consistent with current procedures and sentencing guidelines in the UK.

I have provided a number of examples of similar cases where a drunk has escaped jail for a viscous assaults, and where a white person has been spared jail for a racial assault on a non-white.

Some judges are stricter than others, but the current onus is to find alternatives to custodial sentences when possible, due to the record high in the UK prison population. So there are more and more people convicted of assault who are being spared jail.

This case really isn't out of the ordinary.

Is that why a white English woman who was speaking for the majority on a tram is being held until January? She didn't cause harm to anyone, yet she is in jail.

Explain that...

Originally posted by Twiptwop
Is that why a white English woman who was speaking for the majority on a tram is being held until January? She didn't cause harm to anyone, yet she is in jail.

Explain that...

It's pretty easy to explain.

She has been arrested on suspicion of a racially-aggravated breach of the peace, and has been remanded in custody - awaiting psychological assessment - for her own safety. The notoriety of her outburst, following the video going viral, has led to some idiots making death threats towards her.