Muslim girl gang who kicked young woman in the head while yelling 'kill the white slag' escape jai

Originally posted by ollncasino
Can you provide a link to a case illustrating a gang of whites assaulting a black person on the ground shouting "Kill the black slag!" and then walking away from court because they had been drinking and they can't handle their drink?

I've already dismantled your vapid and illogical point some time ago.

As there hasn't been a case like that, then there obviously can't be an example provided of how the perpetrators were sentenced.

You are making a comparison between a real-life case and a case which only exists in your mind.

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Another thread for the racists to meet at.

Islam is NOT a race! Let me repeat... NOT a race! How many times do we have to explain this simple concept?

Deny Ignorance!

IRM

This started out as a thread about girls beating another girl...but now it has turned it to something that stormfront would have on thier site.

I thought this site was about deny ignorance..blaming an entire race/religion for the few is ignorant.

I am telling you this damn site is becoming more and more like storm front..appears to be a lot of them from the UK. There are a few people on this thread with the intelligence to know that these girls are idiots and their actions do not speak for an entire people...congratulate yourselves...the others need to be banned and hopefully they will leave and join storm front...where their ignorance is welcomed. Statements like immigrants need to be shown their place are just idiotic.

I am not a nice guy and have never claimed to be...but the one thing I do hate is racists...they are the most ignorant people on this earth..get over it..this is a new time...people must adjust to the change...that goes for either race/religion.


The mods need to close this thread.

reply to post by InfaRedMan


it's even more incredible that someone else posted that english people are a race !
WTF !

there is only one race on this planet , any ideas? yes thats right the human race
we are all the same race , we are just seperated physically by land mass and oceans
and different physically by our phenotypes , however we all share the same DNA
and are all the same race !

therefore the word racism , needs to be ammended in the dictionary , as there is no such thing as racism
on earth , there is xenphobia , and a phobia of people of different skin colour.
Racism should only really apply if there were aliens amongst us , and we were truly racist to their species !

Originally posted by Twiptwop

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes

I understand why you're angry. You've probably got some ingrained prejudice against people who are ''different'' to you, and you use biased, agenda-ridden news sources such as The DailyFail to feed your paranoid suspicions and to confirm your pre-conceived prejudices.

edit on 7-12-2011 by Sherlock Holmes because: (no reason given)

It's better than being a pro immigration, pro multicultural invasion, anti English, anti democratic, left wing shill like you. Go and do something useful, like making daisy chains for peace and the continued hatred of white people and the English race from copies of the Guardian.

You've basically proven Sherlock Holmes' point about you having ingrained prejudices there. I am pretty sure the Left-wing is not against democracy or the English, or 'pro multicultural invasion'. That comment is clearly motivated by your ingrained prejudices against the Left-wing

reply to post by kerazeesicko


Yet another person who seeks to close down honest debate because of percieved racism.

This is why things are the way they are. Why racism is still a problem, because rather than honestly tackling the issues honestly on both sides so that a happy medium can eventually surface, debate gets closed down thus the issues are left to fester and fester until real problems surface..

Stop being part of the problem

Jaw jaw is better than war war

Sigh, although Sherlock Holmes claims there's no bias which astounds me with irony considering his avatar name, there IS bias towards the Radical side, we seem utterly unable to pronounce the name in papers or TV without some pompous snob saying we are racist and wrong.

Here's an example...

On Remembrance Day this year Google.co.uk who normally celebrate national Holidays, commemorative events and the like with a nice big logo banner which offers info via links about the person or day, well this time they put the smallest sized poppy image they could find, no links, no info, nothing to give the day a special meaning.

It was jaw drop-ingly embarrassing...

The only reason I can make out was that radical Muslims (look again...RADICAL) had decided as they had the year before to protest on that day (protest is ok I guess) by screaming hate during the one minute silence (NOT ok) and burning poppies, again not at all ok considering the threats about burning a Koran.

This day was about men and women of all cultures and religions who gave their life to save this nation, there's nothing religious or racial about it, quite the opposite in fact. Yet, Google clearly had do this so as to not get involved so keeping the peace with Radicals.

Shocking...

Sorry Sherlock but we both know there's a pretty obvious bias by the politicians, the Police and the media to report negative Muslim stories, for instance this case isn't anywhere on the BBC, its been totally ignored yet its a valid human rights story for the area if not just to help people avoid these thugs locally.

But its not there, and we all know why..

The Police have been made to perform 'culturally cohesive policing' regarding Muslims in general, its a fact, you can see it daily. Whilst I agree a person should never be deliberately highlighted I still believe that a crime is a crime and should be treated equally and not swept away for political gain.

Politicians created so many non speakable wordings for the Police, try finding the word Muslim in any reported hate speech crimes, they are afraid to use the word, what the hell is wrong with sating Radical Muslim using hate speech, its actually totally correct, its not saying that if a Muslim person is caught speeding their religion must be declared, its nothing to do with it, its purely saying that the crime was directly related to their views as a radical Muslim.

At the moment whether you like it or not there is now an addition to the saying "one law for the rich and one for the poor" (which is actually true), the new one is "there's one form of treatment for us and another for radical Muslims and in some cases Muslims in general".

My mother in law hates it when she sees special treatment for Muslims by the media or councils, she quite rightly says that people will look at this and hate us for it, we just want to be British and the same.

So, obviously my mother in law is a plant trying to jam your theory up isn't she, how dare a Muslim be semi critical of others who call themselves Muslim. The truth is many Muslims absolutely remove themselves of being anything to do with these radicals, they say quite rightly that these people are not following the book and why are they making so much trouble for them.

Of course, these Muslims are just making that up as in your view we are all Islamophobic bad people.

Are these Muslims also Islamophobic?

Go on, ask a normal Muslim...

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
This started out as a thread about girls beating another girl...but now it has turned it to something that stormfront would have on thier site.

No, this thread started out about how a horrific racial assault was allowed to occur unpunished, because the victim was white and not ethnic.

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
I thought this site was about deny ignorance..blaming an entire race/religion for the few is ignorant.

This site is about denying ignorance. We are denying the ignorance that the government has tried to impose regarding uncontrolled immigration and "integration".

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
I am telling you this damn site is becoming more and more like storm front..appears to be a lot of them from the UK. There are a few people on this thread with the intelligence to know that these girls are idiots and their actions do not speak for an entire people...congratulate yourselves...the others need to be banned and hopefully they will leave and join storm front...where their ignorance is welcomed. Statements like immigrants need to be shown their place are just idiotic.

Ignoring your pointless diatribe, I cannot see what is "idiotic", as you put it, about ensuring that immigrants are reminded that they are guests in our country, and as such they can and should be shown the door if they break our laws.

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
I am not a nice guy and have never claimed to be...but the one thing I do hate is racists...they are the most ignorant people on this earth..get over it..this is a new time...people must adjust to the change...that goes for either race/religion.

There is nothing, NOTHING racist about being furious over a huge miscarriage of justice. There is NOTHING racist about speaking up against uncontrolled immigration, and there is NOTHING racist about speaking openly about the once mystical and now obvious double standards we are subjected to. Stop crying racism because you don't have the balls to speak up for your people. Coward.

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
The mods need to close this thread.

You need to go away.

Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes

So, I ask you again: what relevance did the words that the women allegedly said towards their victim have to do with the sentence which they received for assault ?

You claimed it had some relevance, but have failed to state how.

Come on Sherlock, you know damn well it does not as its hearsay unless heard by a third party and there's good reason for that. If it had been captured then it should have had a meaningful affect on the sentence, racial crime is a nasty that still goes on throughout the world, the States is awash with it at the moment, we don't need it here in any form.

When it is seen it should be dealt with sternly by ANY court with ANY person.

What we do see here is a calculated attempt to use religion as an excuse for crime and the judge went and bought it.

He's a full time idiot...

The fact they used religion and can be clearly shown as just about anything but being Muslim at the time is what have should have been worked on, these are louts, I doubt that they even were class-able as drunk considering their very obvious mobility and careful body control during the fighting.

This should have been sentenced as a very violent prolonged crime with the religious crap thrown out, Facebook images should have been shown to the judge as proof of their non following of the religion. These as said were violent thugs who should have been jailed for that nasty little crime.

No wonder one of them posted on twitter afterwards that this was a happy happy day and that she will be so going out (oops, what partying and drinking?), she like the others knew damn well they had beat the system by deception.

Personally there should be an appeal by the woman...This wasn't law, this was political correctness gone insanely wrong...

I'm not really bothered what picture Google decides to put on their homepage on Remembrance Sunday. It's a complete triviality what picture a private company decides to put on their website. If you are genuinely offended by this, then that strongly suggests to me that you are looking for a chance to be offended, because of pre-conceived views which you hold.

Originally posted by Mclaneinc
Sorry Sherlock but we both know there's a pretty obvious bias by the politicians, the Police and the media to report negative Muslim stories, for instance this case isn't anywhere on the BBC, its been totally ignored yet its a valid human rights story for the area if not just to help people avoid these thugs locally.

This is not newsworthy outside of the local vicinity. There are thousands of people convicted of assault every year. Barely a fraction of these will get reported on the BBC.

It's just a common-or-garden assault which has been twisted and misrepresented to support the agenda which newspapers like The Daily Fail promote, and which - if this thread is anything to go by - numerous people are willing to unquestioningly lap up, while not applying any independent or critical analysis to.

Originally posted by Mclaneinc
At the moment whether you like it or not there is now an addition to the saying "one law for the rich and one for the poor" (which is actually true), the new one is "there's one form of treatment for us and another for radical Muslims and in some cases Muslims in general".

I've seen an awful lot of question-begging assertions from the anti-Muslim crowd in this thread, but very little tangible substance to any of these claims.

It's almost like reading the comments section of a story in The Daily Fail.

Would you please care to provide some actual evidence to support the notion that radical Muslims - or Muslims in general - are getting preferential treatment in Britain, rather than just stating that they are without anything to substantiate your beliefs ?

Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Twiptwop

 

I would invite you to try it, just to regain full control of this island and fix the disgusting injustices us English have had to suffer.

The UK had no population till after the last ice age. This small island has had wave after wave of immigration...so please what exactly is English...?

i'm an american but i can tell ya what english is!

english is tea and crumpets.
english is a very nice accent.
english is interesting spelling.
english is pretty green gardens and ivy vines on bricks.
english is castles and knights, kings and queens.
english is the beatles, lady di, and david bowie.
english is robin hood.
english is sherlock holmes and shakespeare.
english is rain and fog.
english is manicured lawns.
english is cozy inns.
and lasty but certainly not least,
english is the shire.

Originally posted by Mclaneinc
Come on Sherlock, you know damn well it does not as its hearsay unless heard by a third party and there's good reason for that. If it had been captured then it should have had a meaningful affect on the sentence, racial crime is a nasty that still goes on throughout the world, the States is awash with it at the moment, we don't need it here in any form.

What I suspect is that the racist abuse that was claimed to have been made was only heard by the victim and her boyfriend, and not a third party. Hence why it would be a waste of time to push for the charge of racially-aggravated assault.

The fact of the matter is that they weren't charged with a racially-aggravated offence, and therefore the judge can't treat them more severely for an offence which they weren't charged with.

Therefore, what they were alleged to have shouted during the attack shouldn't have any bearing on the sentence.

Originally posted by Mclaneinc
What we do see here is a calculated attempt to use religion as an excuse for crime and the judge went and bought it.

The fact they used religion and can be clearly shown as just about anything but being Muslim at the time is what have should have been worked on, these are louts, I doubt that they even were class-able as drunk considering their very obvious mobility and careful body control during the fighting.

Again, saying that they ''used religion as an excuse'' is a complete misrepresentation of the events of the case.

It's a defence lawyer's job to try and get the best result for his client, hence why the claim that they were uncharacteristically drunk was used in mitigation. The defence lawyer only mentioned they were Muslim in passing, which presumably was done to give more weight to the claim that being drunk was out of character.

Originally posted by Mclaneinc
No wonder one of them posted on twitter afterwards that this was a happy happy day and that she will be so going out (oops, what partying and drinking?), she like the others knew damn well they had beat the system by deception.

Nowhere has it been remotely suggested that the convicted women used their religion as an excuse for their yobboish behaviour.

Originally posted by Mclaneinc
This wasn't law, this was political correctness gone insanely wrong...

Again, just from the first few pages of a google search, I've listed numerous cases where people convicted of drunken assaults have also received non-custodial sentences.

What makes you think - other than a pre-conceived prejudice and confirmation bias - that these women receiving non-custodial sentences is any different to all of these other similar cases ?

Originally posted by undo

Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Twiptwop

 

I would invite you to try it, just to regain full control of this island and fix the disgusting injustices us English have had to suffer.

The UK had no population till after the last ice age. This small island has had wave after wave of immigration...so please what exactly is English...?

i'm an american but i can tell ya what english is!

english is tea and crumpets.
english is a very nice accent.
english is interesting spelling.
english is pretty green gardens and ivy vines on bricks.
english is castles and knights, kings and queens.
english is the beatles, lady di, and david bowie.
english is robin hood.
english is sherlock holmes and shakespeare.
english is rain and fog.
english is manicured lawns.
english is cozy inns.
and lasty but certainly not least,
english is the shire.

edit on 7-12-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)

If that is all you think we are, then we are in a very bad situation. You have no idea just how sick you have made me feel. Ugh, Yanks.

When the courts fail to enforce justice it is up to the citizens to do so. Some guys jumped a friend of mine. He had them arrested then they all lied in court and got off scot free. So we hunted the attackers down one by one and gave them some justice. It would have been better for them to have pled guilty. My bat would not have gotten all bloody too.

These girls need to be visited by some uncles and cousins and then this needs sorted out. Since the courts didn't work. Whenever the courts fail the people should take care of things.

reply to post by Twiptwop


well if i kept going, the post would be incredibly long.
you want more?

reply to post by undo


''english is sherlock holmes and shakespeare'' is all I need to see. I'm flattered; you're too kind.

Seriously though, ignore the malcontents. I enjoyed your list of Englishness.

Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Twiptwop

 

well if i kept going, the post would be incredibly long.

you want more?

Only if you wish to continue embarrassing yourself with your complete lack of understanding about our nation, history, culture and people.

Just so you know, J.R.R Tolkein was South African, and that silly song you linked to was written by a Canadian.

Originally posted by Twiptwop
Stop crying racism because you don't have the balls to speak up for your people. Coward.
You need to go away.

My people would not whine and cry every time something happens to it's people. My people would stand up fopr themselves..and would not spout ignorance as a defense.

You are just looking for scapegoats to preach your racist rhetoric. I just may go away..stupidity may be catching...

UK are a great people but the few idiots who come on here do not represent the whole, so don't get that feeling.

These few idiots are tired of the color being introduced to their country and are so used to the white majority. Well get used to it...your life of white is changing...if the majority did not like it...I am sure your politicians would be hearing about...but you are in the minority...deal with it.

Originally posted by Twiptwop

Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Twiptwop

 

well if i kept going, the post would be incredibly long.

you want more?

Only if you wish to continue embarrassing yourself with your complete lack of understanding about our nation, history, culture and people.

Just so you know, J.R.R Tolkein was South African, and that silly song you linked to was written by a Canadian.

but the shire is in england. you know it is. that's an english story written by an english man, who wrote it under a tree in south africa. and while he was dreaming it up, he discussed it with his buddies from oxford.

oh did i mention oxford?
english is oxford.
english is tudor.
english is stuart.
english is stonehenge.
english is horses.
english is fox hunts.
(i can do this for places all over the world, btw)
english is cary elwes. (dread pirate westley. don't diss the dpw).
english is cobblestone.
english is mary poppins

english is big ben, twiggy, and beef eaters.
english is pretending the guy you're conversing with is not standing on your toe.

reply to post by Sherlock Holmes


You are joking of course, you really must be....

Re Google, I found it strangle that this company who so clearly like to promote the feel good with nice info's about events etc had so obviously played the day down, it would have been better to ignore it all together.

And please do not infer I go looking for things like this, its a personally important day which you probably don't care much about, I do as do many very grateful British people,

Then again, perhaps you don't like the British? do you, are you?

What annoys is the fact you think or allure to the fact I read the Daily Mail without any proof, please do NOT politicise this subject by using mind numbing slangs, you are not Ian Hislop, you are not on I've got news for you or whatever its called.

I rarely read any paper, reason, they are full of crap mostly, I do however scan multiple sources to get an average reaction to a story and any vital addition bits needed, I'm not a mushroom being fed crap.

As for proofs, no I'm not going to waste my time posting links for you to simply ignore or trivialise them for your view point. Here's some that are factual for you to check and have already been added in this post.

Widely reported, Muslim doctors and theatre staff have been allowed to refrain from washing their whole arm before procedures despite the high problem with cleanliness. This is ONLY offered to Muslims.

Muslim people working in busy supermarkets can opt out of serving alcohol and the lottery, again only offered to Muslim people.

Muslims have preferential Womens Muslim only swimming nights at the public baths, this is not a private paid night, its at the expense of the tax payers and unneeded as its not a religious right.

Some Hospital workers must hide crosses or any religious jewellery because it offends Muslims, no other religion has any such clauses..

Muslim workers request and are given times to go and pray, this is NOT in the religion, it says that if you are otherwise engaged you can pray later, the same as eating pork, they are permitted to eat pork if their life or needs depends on it.

Now I fully expect you to rattle through these and cast racial dispersions about me but don't I am not racist in any form, I am well respected in my families Muslim relations, I'm married to a Muslim lady, I my am not a Muslim because I do not believe in religion, I do however understand peoples faith systems and respect them until its being stamped on to me..

Here;s what I can't get about you, there are Muslims sending in replies who are totally repulsed by this case, they are saying as I have that these are not proper muslims and the best thing you can do with your time is do sleazy political correctness posts when someone of your intelligence should be seeing this is a growing problem that Brits AND UK normal Muslims want stamped out.

They like us are fed up with the radicals getting away with stuff and people in general using their religion for their own purposes which it clearly has been in this case..

If you want to highlight genuine racial comments about people hating Muslims then you do that, do not include men in that nonsense, its unwanted, unfair and stupidity on your part....