posted on Nov, 3 2011 @ 07:07 PM
reply to post by wagnificent
There has been an obnoxious amount of complaining going on about the occupy movement recently, so I decided to start this thread rather than express
my response to these complaints in every one of those threads individually.
There have been far more obnoxious amounts of complaining from those who so arrogantly insist that they represent "99%" of the population, and of
course, one of their most obnoxious complaints is that those who do not agree with their methods and obvious ideology are just "obnoxious".
Trying to undermine the occupy movement is pointless, especially via ATS.
Trying to shove this messageless message of an agendless agenda all the while attempting to undermine the detractors is pointless, yet here you are,
on ATS, doing so.
It's clear that things are going to have to change one way or another, and the occupy movement is essentially deciding what those changes will be.
It is precisely these kind of threats that make, at the very least, the supporters of the "Occupy" movement so damned obnoxious. This messageless
message is that you have an agendless agenda, but somehow that agendless agenda will decide for all what and how changes are going to be made. Yet,
this "Occupy" movement has no interest at all in "occupying" the State of Delaware (the State responsible for more multinational corporations and
Fortune 500 corporations than any State in the Union) to demand that Beau Biden (the current States Attorney General and son of Joe Biden) begin the
process of charter revocation for those corporations that are guilty of corporate malfeasance. This is not a part of the so called "Occupy's"
agendless agenda, but why?
Why does those who claim to represent 99% of the population, and have no qualms of pointing to corporate malfeasance have no interest in all in
actually exerting their claimed force and showing corporatacracy just how fragile their existence really is? Perhaps because, in "deciding what
these changes will be" the pretense of a leaderless group has leaders who have every intention of keeping corporatism alive and well. After all, who
will give all those "99%" jobs? The "99%" have no interest in working for small to midsize companies because they know full well they cannot get
the benefits package and high pay they think they deserve by working for small businesses.
The "99%" could care less about small businesses, and actually adore corporatism, just as long as they get their share of the plunder corporations
are so good at. The "99%" is fine with plunder, just as long as they are getting part of that plunder, and if not then they will get really,
really, really, loud and obnoxious and plant their asses on sidewalks and refuse to leave until someone let's them plunder too.