It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by RSF77
I didnt take it as being harsh so no worries there man.
The government is not there to lead the people, its there to fulfill the vison of the people - their dream, not the ruling class.
People have this irritating ability to point out the problems, and point the finger, and then just stop and throw the towel in.
When the meeting ajourned back in the day when the blue prints of our government were created, a question was asked -
What type of government did the people get?
The response was telling -
A Republic, if they can keep it.
From day one, its been incumbent of the people to participate in government as the ultimate chcks and balance. The C and B for the 3 branches attempts to equal them out, with the ultimate power being reserved with the people.
Every 2 years in this country we get to over throw our government. The responses ive seen in this thread are passionate and valid, but need to be focused to be effective. If the US federal government fails, the American people fail. The world judges us on our actions as a country, not as a government, because in representative republics the government is the people.
As I stated, people make claims about rights being taken, but they cant explain what those rights are, or they give "rights" that arent rights at all, they gie blanket examples / statements that dont take into account the different levels of government.
We have elected officals who know what the constitution is, but have never taken the time to read it and understand it. I view that problem as a direct result of the people, the citizens, not know what it actually says either.
When an uninformed person is elected to office, its generally because the people who voted are also uninformed. We know this because people will state why they voted for an individual, and the predominant answer is because the person shares my same views or close to them.
Originally posted by HellstormRising
reply to post by RSF77
Don't take what I said the wrong way. I'm sick of it too. Once they've beaten us down far enough they will destroy our freedoms. I know this, you know this, most of the people at ATS at least have some semblance of knowledge on this but people are to stupid or greedy to do anything about it. I don't lay down and take it that is just my perspective on the atmosphere. People are pissed because of the erosion of the rights we still have and most of the people pissed off and doing something about it lack the understanding of the rights that we had in the past. It's tyranny via apathy of the people and that's what they're counting on.
This is one of the reasons I still go to this site because I still believe that there is a chance for the people to make the government finally represent them for the first time since the mid 60's and tell all the lobbyists and corporations to go somewhere else. The key is to get true representation in our government which is definitely not the case currently.
The Declaration of Independance has absolutely no legal bearing on individual rights for US citizens. It was a nice letter to the crown as to why we were telling them to bugger off. This reinforces one of my points though that people have an idea of the documents themsleves, but dont know how they work and apply.
Freedom of religion is a good one for another point. Seperation of Church and State, since weve seena lot of that. Seperation of church and state is nowhere in the constitution.
Permit requirement is generally required when major public right of ways are affected - IE roads. Your individual rights extend to the point when htey interfere with others, at which poiint its stops.
The right guarantees you that you can individualy own a gun. Taxes or no taxes, you can own a gun.
Then it would be a 42 usc violation and you have a right to sue for a civil rights violation. However, being its a blanket statment you gave with no other info, my guess is there was something else going on you either arent aware of or dont recognize something they did as valid when in fact it is.
Again a blanket statement with no info.
Actually no it has not.
Not really and again a blanket statement
You use the term birth right - explain what that is and where it comes from, and how the government ook it form you.
Originally posted by cryptographrix
reply to post by Xcathdra
You remember learning about sharecropping in school? Do you remember learning about how the tyranny in sharecropping wasn't in /denying anybody their rights/, but in the deliberate misinterpretation of those rights in favor of the group of people in power?
Asking such a black and white question such as "what rights have you lost" on ATS is flamebait because by legal definitions, nobody has lost any rights since around 1860.
But sharecropping didn't take any rights from anyone, either.
Way to lawyer troll ATS.
Originally posted by HellstormRising
reply to post by Xcathdra
Hey XCathdra, Pleasure to see you around again. I think a better way to approach this is if you formulated an interpretation of the constitutional amendments and who, what, how, when and why they apply. That will certainly give a better understanding of where your argument is coming from.
My personal opinion is that we haven't really LOST any of our rights that are granted to us by The Constitution however the Federal government is certainly doing the best they can to infringe on the individuals rights. They have made significantly more difficult to speak out, express ourselves, protect ourselves and live happy productive lives. Their lies have perpetuated a culture that screws everyone else but themselves and only benefits those in power which means they don't represent us so we have lost the individual right to be properly represented by a state official in congress etc.
this is just my opinion but it's truly how many people feel.edit on 15-10-2011 by HellstormRising because: incomplete sentences - herpderp moment
Originally posted by RSF77
I agree with you on a lot of things, it makes me wonder why everyone sees everything so differently.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by Xcathdra
Not so much rights as a general loss of influence in our own political structure, which in turn leads to erosion of rights. Money has taken over our political system. THus those with hte money to spend have more say than those who do not. The net result is a reduction in both rights and privileges of people in America.
It's illegal to sleep in a public park, but it's legal to bilk the federal government out of 4 trillion dollars via threats of crashing hte economy.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
Have you been to New York City? Do you know it is illegal to to purchase, own, transport, or carry a long gun or a hand gun without a permit, which you have to jump through loopholes to obtain, and which can be denied for no particular reason. This is a loss of a right - period.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
I've seen and known people personally who have taken such to court and it has been defended under the Patriot Act so don't try to play me. As for my personal incident, I was asked to search my vehicle, to which I declined for the officer to search anyway because I had out of state plates. My friend was searched because he had droopy eyes at two in the morning and was suspect of transporting drugs. This is a violation and there is nothing anyonecan do about it thanks to the acts the have been passed in government.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
I'm not going to give examples. Do a search on ATS. I'm answering your question and yet you are finding any excuse not to accept the answers.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
Let us take a very public trial in the past year. Casey Anthony was suspected for murder on July 28, 2008. She was indicted on October 14th, 2008 and she was arraigned on October 28th, 2008. Her trial began on May 24th, 2011 - nearly THREE YEARS AFTER her arrest, only to be found innocent of the murder charge 6 weeks later.
Originally posted by RSF77
reply to post by Xcathdra
Thank you for making this out to be a good thread, I believe we are now getting to the root of our problem.
You are right, I think one answer might be a more open and accessible basic and specialist education system. Once again I think that if people are free, a system would be conceived almost automatically. Right in line with progressive ideology that I talked about in the last post.
I think America needs to do whatever is most inline with this as much as they can get. A better industrial base wouldn't hurt either.edit on 15-10-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by gwydionblack
What is your point?