It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Erno86
The light and shade is at a perfect angle, so as to give the contrasting shade effect of the aliens helmet.
The leg and foot have a tannish fleshy look.
The two huge black eyes have a glassey look.edit on 19-10-2011 by Erno86 because: added a sentence
There is no sunlight reflecting off the "helmet"............what you are seeing is simply "faces in the rock".....Pareidolia........whether that be in the fossil rocks themselves or the sediment or dirt built up on the rocks.
If you zoom in enough you never ever get any details of a "helmet" or "alien face".......which points to the fact that it's not really an "alien face" you are seeing........the "fleshy rock" is simply a rock of a paler colouration the same "flesh" coloured rocks can be seen close to this rock.
If zoom in enough you will see that the "eyes" of the "alien image" are not even symmetrical or the same size ..........again further pointing to the fact that it was just a rock, that with the lighting conditions in the video making you think you saw MR.ET.
But hey........If you want to go on believing that the rock feature you filmed all those years ago was an "alien" then carry on..........don't let a little thing like the truth spoil your "video find of the century"edit on 19-10-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Erno86
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Erno86
The light and shade is at a perfect angle, so as to give the contrasting shade effect of the aliens helmet.
The leg and foot have a tannish fleshy look.
The two huge black eyes have a glassey look.edit on 19-10-2011 by Erno86 because: added a sentence
There is no sunlight reflecting off the "helmet"............what you are seeing is simply "faces in the rock".....Pareidolia........whether that be in the fossil rocks themselves or the sediment or dirt built up on the rocks.
If you zoom in enough you never ever get any details of a "helmet" or "alien face".......which points to the fact that it's not really an "alien face" you are seeing........the "fleshy rock" is simply a rock of a paler colouration the same "flesh" coloured rocks can be seen close to this rock.
If zoom in enough you will see that the "eyes" of the "alien image" are not even symmetrical or the same size ..........again further pointing to the fact that it was just a rock, that with the lighting conditions in the video making you think you saw MR.ET.
But hey........If you want to go on believing that the rock feature you filmed all those years ago was an "alien" then carry on..........don't let a little thing like the truth spoil your "video find of the century"edit on 19-10-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Logical one - Your assessment of my perported ET picture sounds illogical too me. Since when does a helmet have to be symmetrical?
What do you think of my second picture, taken by me approx. 5 years later? Titled: Petroglyph Carving of a Space Alien.
Carved by an unknown artist. The carving has the same shape of the aliens helmet. It even has the slit up the nose. I believe that it could have been carved by the space alien himself. The petroglyph is located behind the rectangular megalith 15 feet above the aliens throne,
I know it was a throne, because I've sat on the same fossil rock that the robot or space alien sat on; dozens of times myself. It is a powerful feeling knowing that you sat on the same rock that the space alien sat on.
In the first picture - Can you see a petroglyph carving of a saucer shape located in the top center of the photograph on the face of cliff. Carved by an unknown. Right above the saucer shape, an unknown used a lighter type of soil and fingerpainted "STARS " on the face of Calvert Cliffs. You probably can't see it in that picture, because of sun reflection. But I do have another picture showing it.
Notice also - In the center of the first photograph you might notice another petroglyph carved by an unknown. Using the lighter type of soil on darker type of soil on the slope of cliff, you will see an approx. 10 foot high humanoid shape with tall long shapes to the right and left of the humanoid carving.
The only thing that I carved into the face of cliff with the landowners permission was: Welcome to Earth.
On a dead 12 inch tree that fell over the top of the 200' high cliff, at the same location I carved and chisled in the debarked tree: Require Tachyons + Anti-Grav Black Holes. Stop 1999 AA Asteroid.
Just put yourself in the Aliens spot - And ask yourself - Where would I want to go if I landed here on Earth?
The most probable answer would be: Calvert Cliffs in Maryland, USA; on the Western Shore of the Chesapeake Bay.
edit on 20-10-2011 by Erno86 because: typoedit on 20-10-2011 by Erno86 because: added a few wordsedit on 20-10-2011 by Erno86 because: ditto
Originally posted by Erno86
Logical one - Your assessment of my perported ET picture sounds illogical too me. Since when does a helmet have to be symmetrical?
Originally posted by Jonas86
I too have followed the UFO scene for a few years and have encountered mysterious stories... but no solid evidence. Personally I'm still baffled by the Norway Spiral and the Chinese Airport UFO which are fairly recent and have been pondered in the mainstream media also, and cannot be explained by ANYTHING. I'm stunned they're not being explored anymore. And what happened with the wave of animal mass-deaths?
I've started to see things in a different light. Now what's the interesting thing about the UFO mysteries is the other side: how come all these people are telling all these extraordinary lies about craft that could only have been controlled by an alien force?
Originally posted by rigel4
ET UFO's are not real. I've been following this subject for years and years, and still
have found nothing. one or two cases can't be explained away , but neiter can they be proven as
extra terrestrial craft.
Every other report, video or sighting inevitably is a hoax or misidentified.
Even cases like Roswell have become so distorted that there is little or no chance of the truth ever being known.
And what is that truth, if you ask me it is all wishful thinking on the part of the UFO believers.
There are just too many contradictions. here is one that a simple soul like me spotted many times , in loads
of different accounts about "Roswell". " The metal was light and flexible but yet couldn't be scratched or dented"
Well how come it ended up in a million bits strewn across a field, if it was so unbreakable.
Hmm Was it a weather balloon, me thinks yes it was.
In most other cases believers simply ignore the evidence against and manipulate the evidence that supports their cause. For me there is not one ufo case that stands up as a genuine ET craft.
The Alien and UFO thread is nothing more than joke. When was the last time anything was posted, that was
* new and not posted anywhere else, that was not an obvious hoax, i'll tell you NEVER.
UFO ET Craft are not visiting Earth. There is NO EVIDENCE to suggest otherwise.
Prove me wrong
edit on 9-10-2011 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)edit on 10-10-2011 by Gazrok because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DrJay1975
The entire premise of a UFO is it's unidentified. In a true UFO it could just as easily be terrestrial as extraterrestrial. It's more likely to be terrestrial sure but that doesn't mean that alien origin can be written off.