It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
reply to post by Insomniac
You know what I found to be an uneasy coincidence?
That we keep using the figure "911" in relation to the topic of potential asteroid disaster scenarios.
That is quite the coincidence I must say.
They should have waited to find another one to release this story. That was it would be 912 instead, and the coincidental connotations would be avoided.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Insomniac
While I agree with everyone else that 93% discovered leaves 7% and it's all pretty shaky guess work to get those numbers, it's also quite impressive. If part of your intent is to note how effective NEOWISE and other efforts with similar goals have been, it really is worth a look.
A cursory glance at Near Earth Object lists shows a virtual explosion of names assigned in the past 10 years, so I definitely give a star for bringing this story. I'd imagine we're learning a heck of a lot by now identifying and keeping an eye on as many of these as current methods might allow.
Perhaps the work done here will help avoid an impact with one that would really do damage. This is the kind of science that ought to inspire kids to the subject.