It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by MrXYZ
the mtdna not the nuclear dna
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by MrXYZ
you and iteration just keep repeating yourselves like a broken record. that's what you get with linear thinking. You both fail to realize the actual physical evidence for the skull corroborates what the dna is telling us.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by MrXYZ
you and iteration just keep repeating yourselves like a broken record. that's what you get with linear thinking. You both fail to realize the actual physical evidence for the skull corroborates what the dna is telling us.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Varemia
Simple, our mtDNA shows us to be 200,000 years old while we supposedly evolved from primates over 6 million years ago.
It's simply not possible because DNA is the math of biology.
Anyhow, all sources are saying we are 200,000 years old, which automatically debunked evolution as well as religious followers.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by iterationzero
Your making an assumption our lineage goes back further, please show me a link of sorts that says so.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Well your assuming that evolution has to be present to exist and your forgetting about the possibility of intervention.