It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Oh I have a few. IMO intervention isn't a question, it does nothing but provide answers.
When I see strong clues in the bible, our DNA and in sumerrian text telling us that intervention is what happened to us, it shocks me how people are struggling so hard to try to make sense of evolution.
You can probably convince yourself of anything if you work hard enough at it.
It reminds me of star child with Lloyd Pye. The DNA results proved that the mtdna was human but that the mother and father DNA was cohearant and not human.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Humans have less chromosomes than primates. Does this really need explanation.
If you disagree, please explain what we gave up and how much less we became than primates.
I guess we lost our tails.
This I already explained to you, but I'm somewhat versed in the knowledge, so I'll repeat.
The reason humans have 46 chromosomes while all other apes have 48 is because we have a single fused chromosome. In other words, it is 2 chromosomes in one. That is how the genetic data was able to allow for our species to continue breeding.
Now, if I need to explain this further, we have 23 unique chromosomes, each with a double. One of these is very large and has "ends" of chromosome markers in the center. This is directly indicative of a fusion of two chromosomes. Boom, you have one species with 46 and one with 48.
Now, will you learn from this, or will you ignore it and continue being the ignorant fool you keep acting like?
Aside from yourself believing it to be fact is there any sources or links, because Lloy Pye says the opposite.
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by bottleslingguy
You looked at videos that someone puts in the link offers nothing but a message of that's it?
I he cannot be bothered to discuss I certainly wont take time to view. Its a bit like leaving a book, telling people this is the truth and then leaving them to read into it what they wish.
How would that work in real life?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Who gives a rat's ass about Pye??? He's an AUTHOR and has no qualifications to support his claims (or evidence for that matter)
Originally posted by iterationzero
It provides no more answers than a typical "god of the gaps" fallacy. It's predicated on the existence of beings for which, you've already agreed, we have no objective evidence.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by iterationzero
It provides no more answers than a typical "god of the gaps" fallacy. It's predicated on the existence of beings for which, you've already agreed, we have no objective evidence.
this is so untrue and indicative of the mindset that is destined to not adapt
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Who gives a rat's ass about Pye??? He's an AUTHOR and has no qualifications to support his claims (or evidence for that matter)
this comment will go down in infamy as one of the dumbest comments ever. Have you read EYKIW? What evidence doesn't he have?
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by bottleslingguy
I see no reason to read or view anything on a discussion forum posted by someone that submits one post and then says they will take no further part.
If you got something from it good for you. What I got from it was bad manners from the poster.
edit on 12-11-2011 by colin42 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Who gives a rat's ass about Pye??? He's an AUTHOR and has no qualifications to support his claims (or evidence for that matter)
this comment will go down in infamy as one of the dumbest comments ever. Have you read EYKIW? What evidence doesn't he have?
For one, he claims the skull is a human-alien hybrid...when DNA tests clearly show it's 100% human
The problem is, Pye doesn't have any qualifications that would allow him to make any of the claims he's making...which is why he mistook hydrocephalus for something "alien".
But yeah, continue believing a guy who's DEMONSTRABLY wrong as DNA tests show...doesn't make any sense, and it's beyond irrational, but it's a free country, people are allowed to believe in fairy talesedit on 12-11-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by iterationzero
It provides no more answers than a typical "god of the gaps" fallacy. It's predicated on the existence of beings for which, you've already agreed, we have no objective evidence.
this is so untrue and indicative of the mindset that is destined to not adapt
If it were untrue, you'd be able to present objective evidence...which you still haven't
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Who gives a rat's ass about Pye??? He's an AUTHOR and has no qualifications to support his claims (or evidence for that matter)
this comment will go down in infamy as one of the dumbest comments ever. Have you read EYKIW? What evidence doesn't he have?
For one, he claims the skull is a human-alien hybrid...when DNA tests clearly show it's 100% human
The problem is, Pye doesn't have any qualifications that would allow him to make any of the claims he's making...which is why he mistook hydrocephalus for something "alien".
But yeah, continue believing a guy who's DEMONSTRABLY wrong as DNA tests show...doesn't make any sense, and it's beyond irrational, but it's a free country, people are allowed to believe in fairy talesedit on 12-11-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
Your reply is demonstrably ignorant and based on earlier data. There is updated information from '10. Again though you can believe what you want.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
watch this video and by the end of it you will be demonstrably shown how it proves evolution wrong (actually he mentions one of my ideas at around 3:15).
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by MrXYZ
it's not HIS science and instead of him linking this to the messages of Christ he needs to realize the Old Testament comes from earlier much more ancient writings from the time when the Annunaki walked/flew around the Earth. THEY are the ones who installed this genetic entropy in us. It's one of the reasons why blood lines were so important to them, keeping the genetic record from decomposing. It raises myriad question from me yet people who think like you just ignore it.
You can't prove the human species is getting more fit genetically unless we (or somebody else) use technology to tamper with our genome and hopefully we ARE going to get help but not from who Dr Sanford thinks. I bet it's the ones who put the code in there to begin with and I hope they have the compassion to not allow us to go the way of the Neanderthals (who were more genetically "fit" than we are now) but that seems unlikely.
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by MrXYZ
it's not HIS science and instead of him linking this to the messages of Christ he needs to realize the Old Testament comes from earlier much more ancient writings from the time when the Annunaki walked/flew around the Earth. THEY are the ones who installed this genetic entropy in us. It's one of the reasons why blood lines were so important to them, keeping the genetic record from decomposing. It raises myriad question from me yet people who think like you just ignore it.
You can't prove the human species is getting more fit genetically unless we (or somebody else) use technology to tamper with our genome and hopefully we ARE going to get help but not from who Dr Sanford thinks. I bet it's the ones who put the code in there to begin with and I hope they have the compassion to not allow us to go the way of the Neanderthals (who were more genetically "fit" than we are now) but that seems unlikely.
Um, here:
www.weirdcrap.com...
That site will answer your questions. The idea that the genome will degrade over time is simply bad science.