It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No my typo doesn't cause the bible to be wrong.
And you still have not answered whether the bible was wrong which it must be for your statement that it supported to e a typo.
It was a typo, I dunno what else your expecting me to tell you.
Dont know if I noticed you contradicted yourself I have been pointing that out for pages before you decided to come out with the typo lie as a cover story.
No it doesn't, why do you believe that?
But again lets say it was not a lie the bible still supported the 'typo' so the bible was in that case wrong? What is the answer?
I doubt seriously if 99.5% of the population believes in evolution.
Oh tooth...criticizing my numbers before doing the least bit of research
No, the numbers aren't made up, they're REAL.
Evolution has nothing to say about how life began. Just how it evolved after it began.
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by colin42
You cannot even discus neither creation or evolution without actually know how life began... because if you can figure out how life began then you would have your answer..
all this is just speculation and mental masterbation
What do you mean I won't bother looking it up, I know it by heart. I got a print out of this years ago and had to pay for it from a library, but it was from the Assam tribune.
Also, regarding that "mitochondrial Eve"...at no point was there a single woman!!! Read the whole damn article on Wiki, at least do that for crying out loud.
I'll link it again: LINK
And here's the relevant quote (because I know you won't bother looking it up):
Define the word define.
And as I have stated many times the words I chose do not come up with any alternate meanings, so if you just use the english language, which you seem to be having trouble with, you will get a clear definition.
With exception to target food.
You, without a doubt are the most stupid, ignorant person on the planet.
YOU USE TERMS not WORDS and the TERMS you use are what you MADE UP. Define the TERMS not the WORDS contained in the TERM
We can simplify those terms into single words if it helps you Colin.
No you dunce. I am asking you to define your made up words just as I would expect others to ask for if I wrote about 'costume swimming'. Read it again you fool.
Ok lets scrap in the wild just for you, and change it to "Wild".
No you complete dolt I ask you to explain what IN THE WILD meant in the context you used it. Not WILD or WILDLIFE see the example given showing you cannot mix words without changing their meaning.
Just because you ignore my definitions and terms doesn't mean I have lost a debate. Your an oddball.
Funny, everyone else here believes you have failed to provide any argument for your standpoint. Agree you have provided no evidence and are all agreed you are prepared to lie to cover your ignorance.
You lost boy and you lost BIG TIME
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
I doubt seriously if 99.5% of the population believes in evolution.
Oh tooth...criticizing my numbers before doing the least bit of research
No, the numbers aren't made up, they're REAL.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
What do you mean I won't bother looking it up, I know it by heart. I got a print out of this years ago and had to pay for it from a library, but it was from the Assam tribune.
Also, regarding that "mitochondrial Eve"...at no point was there a single woman!!! Read the whole damn article on Wiki, at least do that for crying out loud.
I'll link it again: LINK
And here's the relevant quote (because I know you won't bother looking it up):
Your not telling me anything I don't already know.
And now after reading the rest of your reply, I still have not learned anything new, as I said I pretty much know this article by heart.
Then explain how it can be a typo when you use the bible as back up for your so called typo
No my typo doesn't cause the bible to be wrong.
You clearly link what you maintain now was a TYPO with what it says according to you in the bible. Clearly if it was a typo then the bible must be wrong. If it was not a typo then you were caught lying. Or you lied about what it says in the bible.
Well I never said that all or even most others have target food, especially since it even tells us in the bible that a lot of species were brought here, means they probably won't have target food.
THE TRUTH
It was a typo, I dunno what else your expecting me to tell you.
See above
No it doesn't, why do you believe that?
Just as Nelson saw no ships when he looked through his spy glass using his blind eye.
I wasn't looking for natural things that ants do, I was looking for unnatural things they do, and guess what, I came up with nothing, which is what I based my conclusion on.
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by colin42
You cannot even discus neither creation or evolution without actually know how life began... because if you can figure out how life began then you would have your answer..
all this is just speculation and mental masterbation
Well not everything lives in the wild. When people live in civilization, that is not considered to be in the wild, as the definition explains. So in other words, anything not in civilization.
And again. I want to know what you meant by IN THE WILD. As is. Anything that lives in the wild.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by flyingfish
Just because I have pointed out some mistakes that everyone on here is making in the understanding of speciation, does not make me a liar. I do however deserve a pat on the back for pointing it out.