It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by HappyBunny
I am still PISSED OFF ABOUT THE CAT EXPERIMENT! LOL! Even if he was using an example. I am not one for his physics of the Cat being in a NON-STATE. I believe he wentdown the wrong road on that concept. As far as observation changing the observed....this seems to lend itself as part of a Multiversal System.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by ThreeNF
Reply to post by BohemianBrim
The third option is that we were created by aliens, as self programmable biological machines that have the ability to evolve in response to our everchanging environment.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by Shoonra
Can I prove evolution wrong?
Well, when I look at people like Rush Limbaugh and Scott Walker it's tough to say that they are improvements on the orangutan.
Our methods of adaptation don't coincide with anything from the anteater. Your confusing our adaptation with the ants natural instinct.
Ah the anteater. Are you going to finally explain the ant and its many traits it shares with humans that shows either ants are not from here or humans are from here. Which makes the anteaters target food (whatever that means) as full of it as the rest of your nonsense.
The rest of your braindeath in a paragraph has been answered yet again and in many pages previously.
No I stayed away from children s books but it would appear you didn't, which is also why you probably don't give much credit to the bible.
Yep and it could have been a definition of a ship, but then again there is also the story of moby dick.
How learned you are. Another wild guess and then a huge dose of ignorance. Moby Dick is about a man hunting a whale not living inside a whale called Moby you dick.
Any moron knows this planet has been flooded, what did you not learn.
Is there any subject you do not have a total ignorance of? You really need to get an education
Maybe you should go first I mean after all you seem to be more sure about it than I am.
Your the one making the claims for it being factual. Its up to you to present the proof. Being a science master you should know that.
It's a fact that we don't fit in here.
Do you even realise how stupid that sentence is?
Actually Pye is the least of my mentions, it would seem you don't pay attention.
Done...and all you do is repeat the gospel of that snake oil salesman Pye
I have lived in three different states that all have evidence of flooding, and your going to tell me its a local issue.
You're confusing evidence for LOCAL floods with evidence for a global flood
Oh and I guess you never heard of Noahs ark, and it raining for 40 days and 40 nights, or is it that you simply choose to ignore the obvious facts around us because it was actually written in the bible.
As I said, there is no evidence of a global flood that happened at one point in time. Even when the planet formed, it was never fully covered in water.
I already looked at this, and like I said last time it doesn't mean that everything in the bible is wrong.
Plenty of evidence against the bible's accuracy...you just keep ignoring it
Well then the next time you actually feel like you do fit in here, go back to your man made home, and your man made television, and your man made heat and man made AC and man made processed food, and man made medical intervention, and man made clothing, and man made electricity and man made piped water and sewer, to tell me just how well you are accepted naturally. You idiot!
That's exactly what I'm saying...and science backs that up.
I'm not familiar with all of the contradictions to back them up but will say this. What few contradictions I have looked at were all fine once they were looked at from the supernatural perspective. I'm sorry but it sounds like the person that was reading it wasn't qualified to be doing so.
The bible being inaccurate and full of contradictions isn't an "opinion" given the link I posted above...it's a FACT.
Agreed, we need the calcium and because our correct supply of calcium is not here, we use cows milk, that doesn't mean we won't have problems, its not OUR INTENDED milk.
No we don't. We have issues digesting milk products at later ages, at least some of us. But in terms of meat we aren't in any way suffering from a disability when it comes to digesting meat.
WTF man, your not going to tell me you believe we are suppose to or used to eat grass.
Higher in energy content. 1kg in grass has less energy than 1kg of meat. It's simple biology.
Again if it makes no sense to you, then your not qualified to read it. Don't accept your own ignorance as an excuse for fault.
I'm not saying the bible is science fiction...I'm saying it's fiction. As I proved above, it's full of contradictions...so clearly isn't not factual. Claiming otherwise can be called denial
I might be confusing it with another story, oh well, sorry guys this isn't one I keep by my bed at night, it looks like you guys are better versed in moby dick.
LMAO!
I can't fathom the ignorance of the tooths. It's like what hell, do you even believe yourself at this point? I think not! how can anyone be so stupid.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Any moron knows this planet has been flooded, what did you not learn.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Oh and I guess you never heard of Noahs ark, and it raining for 40 days and 40 nights, or is it that you simply choose to ignore the obvious facts around us because it was actually written in the bible.
It's scientifically impossible from a natural point of view, no one ever said it was natural.
Oh, wow! Some scientists hypothesize, that about 650 million years ago all of Earth was covered by snow and ice (snowball Earth hypothesis). However, a global flood is scientifically speaking impossible, and there is no evidence that such thing has ever occurred (it would have led an obvious mark). We could of course argue that there was global magic flood, but then we could also argue that unicorns rained from the sky for 40 days, and these two ideas are equally likely to have happened as there's equally as much evidence for them, none.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by rhinoceros
It's scientifically impossible from a natural point of view, no one ever said it was natural.
Oh, wow! Some scientists hypothesize, that about 650 million years ago all of Earth was covered by snow and ice (snowball Earth hypothesis). However, a global flood is scientifically speaking impossible, and there is no evidence that such thing has ever occurred (it would have led an obvious mark). We could of course argue that there was global magic flood, but then we could also argue that unicorns rained from the sky for 40 days, and these two ideas are equally likely to have happened as there's equally as much evidence for them, none.
If you want to limit yourself to the forces of human knowledge, then no we don't have the ability at this time to perform such an act. Thats not to say that it was humans that caused it.
So you agree that global flood is impossible from a scientific point of view, yet at the same time you say things like "Any moron knows this planet has been flooded". That's schizophrenic. Or wait, maybe it makes sense. Morons "know" that the Earth has been flooded.. okay I think I got it now..
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by rhinoceros
It's scientifically impossible from a natural point of view, no one ever said it was natural.
Oh, wow! Some scientists hypothesize, that about 650 million years ago all of Earth was covered by snow and ice (snowball Earth hypothesis). However, a global flood is scientifically speaking impossible, and there is no evidence that such thing has ever occurred (it would have led an obvious mark). We could of course argue that there was global magic flood, but then we could also argue that unicorns rained from the sky for 40 days, and these two ideas are equally likely to have happened as there's equally as much evidence for them, none.
So you agree that global flood is impossible from a scientific point of view, yet at the same time you say things like "Any moron knows this planet has been flooded". That's schizophrenic. Or wait, maybe it makes sense. Morons "know" that the Earth has been flooded.. okay I think I got it now..
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by HappyBunny
There has even been speculation that water was transported from mars over to flood the earth. Now if this happened we would probably have an immediate flood followed by plates moving then the planet trying to settle as the water settles in.
Oddly enough we have all of these. Pangea is proof that the plates were moved. To this day this planet suffers from earthquakes which could be from water being added to this planet.
If god, or anyone for that matter did move water here from another planet, it would have to be the biggest magic trick in the universe, but that doesn't mean its impossible.
Originally posted by HappyBunny
It seems that SOMETHING big happened. Why in the world would people from all over the world tell essentially the same story otherwise?
Well what are you trying to say, there is no question they fit. Just like a puzzle.
In the late sixties I was laughed at in school for saying that the continents looked like they fit together.Especially by the teacher. I learned to keep my thoughts to myself.
If I had these answers, we probably wouldn't be arguing about milk. Anyhow its just something I heard about.
How would water get from Mars to here?
You can't add water to the system. That's the definition of a closed system. We have what we have and that's all we're ever going to get.
Well I wouldn't say its impossible. We are still learning about how planets are formed, and we are still in the early stages. The whole idea of water being moved here from mars was just something I heard about. I think its very possible. It sure explains a lot about how this planet has changed and the current changes its going through still. This planet is unsettled. Volcanoes, Earthquakes, could all be from water being added to this planet. The water has to shift and settle in. We could be living through the stages of it still happening, and it might happen for millions of years to come.
Impact or not, the main point here was that global flood is simply impossible, and there is no evidence at all that such thing ever happened. As to why many cultures have (not essentially the same, but similar in the sense that something was flooding) stories.. Humans need water. Humans live next to water. Floods happen everywhere. It's not difficult to see why there are stories about floods..