188 Days, it happened

It didn't happen...the Earthquake was no where near California.
oh yeah, watch the video again....he doesn't even predict an Earthquake...

He predicts something happening in California...

Originally posted by Akasirus
On average 15 7.0-7.9 earthquakes happen every year. So seeing as one is going to occur every 23 days, one will likely fall within +/- 10 days of the predicted 188, and it is very easy to pick one of them and say "There it happened!" when in reality it is of very little statistical significance.

Problem is we are way above the average this year.......see the USGS site and too......they have changed their numbers and some quakes are supposedly taken off the readings. OK we had large quake in the eastern US a few weeks ago.......you can't make me believe this is normal. WE don't have those here often.........and quakes are occurring on a routine basis all over. The ring of fire is really worked up.......so hey think what you will. This may be nothing or something.....better to be safe than oh yea that 6.5 under my house was nothing as it sits in a pile of rubble. huh.........

Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by SatoriTheory

 

ST, Is YU55 aligning at all?

Why are EQ's happening every 188 days? I agree it's not Elenin now.

edit on 16-9-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)

I have no idea if YU55 has been 'aligning'. Whether it aligns or not is irrelevant. YU55 is a 400m ball of iron. It would not affect earth during any alignments.

Here is something for you to ponder. All these 'big' quakes, are there people on here who are witnessing them, or are you just going off USGS data? How do you know they are actually happening?

st.

Edit: It's not just 188 days, they are happening every day, just different magnitudes. Try picking a different number, can you see earthquake pattern for that new number?

I can't prove it, but my spider-sense is tingling, it's telling me some of them might be getting 'faked'.

Originally posted by speaknoevil07

Originally posted by Akasirus
On average 15 7.0-7.9 earthquakes happen every year. So seeing as one is going to occur every 23 days, one will likely fall within +/- 10 days of the predicted 188, and it is very easy to pick one of them and say "There it happened!" when in reality it is of very little statistical significance.

Problem is we are way above the average this year.......see the USGS site and too......they have changed their numbers and some quakes are supposedly taken off the readings. OK we had large quake in the eastern US a few weeks ago.......you can't make me believe this is normal. WE don't have those here often.........and quakes are occurring on a routine basis all over. The ring of fire is really worked up.......so hey think what you will. This may be nothing or something.....better to be safe than oh yea that 6.5 under my house was nothing as it sits in a pile of rubble. huh.........

There's been 16 of them so far this year, that is not way above average. Some years there are 10, some more than 20, 16 is well within the normal bounds.

There was one 7.3 quake in Alaska, a 5.8 in Virginia, everything else has been below 5.0. Again, this is not way above average.

I'm not saying a 6.5 earthquake would do nothing to your house, I'm saying it is nothing statistically significant. Go here, start looking at the earthquake information by year instead of trying to spread fear and panic and lgetting all worked up.

You do have quakes in the eastern US, they just don't happen often. Here's a list of a dozen quakes occuring in the Midwestern/eastern US in history, most of which were larger than the 5.8 in Virginia.

Earthquakes are occurring on a routine basis everywhere, but that is to be expected. There are dozens of quakes of various sizes daily. Please show me somewhere where these are out of place statistically and not just seemingly out of place in your head.

But let's say you are right, the 'ring of fire is worked up' and there are more earthquakes to be expected this year. How is that information going to prevent your house from becoming a pile of rubble if a quake hits?

I actually haven't heard of this 188 day earthquake theory. Has there already been 188 days of consistent quakes? I thought earthquakes happened almost every day around the world anyways?

while I think anything in the 7.0 range is probably a coincidence - I did find Lights theory interesting

I completely ignore all the Elenin points

The 188 day theory COULD be possible for another reason we're unaware of

but only if we have a 9.2 in March
otherwise its coincidence
see you in 6 months ♥

Originally posted by OhNoItsCritical
I actually haven't heard of this 188 day earthquake theory. Has there already been 188 days of consistent quakes? I thought earthquakes happened almost every day around the world anyways?

Someone predicted that every 188 days there would be a significant earthquake, based on the fact there was a large quake 188 days after the Japan quake. However, they left open their definition of significant, and due to the incredibly general guidelines of this 'theory' people are still dinging onto it because it 'seems to fit'.

There are on average three 5.0-5.9 earthquakes every day, one 6.0-6.9 quake every 3 days, and a 7.0-7.9 every 22. It would be odd not to see a major earthquake every 188 days, depending on your definition of major. Just look here to see how many events have happened this year alone: Significant Earthquakes Worldwide - 2011

There are significant quakes (as designated by the USGS) happening every couple of days. No one has really explained why this is anything weird or unusual, or been able to point out any actual statistical anomalies, they just keep falsely perpetuating the idea that earthquakes are becoming more frequent or predictable.

Originally posted by SatoriTheory

Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by SatoriTheory

 

ST, Is YU55 aligning at all?

Why are EQ's happening every 188 days? I agree it's not Elenin now.

edit on 16-9-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)

I have no idea if YU55 has been 'aligning'. Whether it aligns or not is irrelevant. YU55 is a 400m ball of iron. It would not affect earth during any alignments.

Here is something for you to ponder. All these 'big' quakes, are there people on here who are witnessing them, or are you just going off USGS data? How do you know they are actually happening?

st.

Edit: It's not just 188 days, they are happening every day, just different magnitudes. Try picking a different number, can you see earthquake pattern for that new number?

I can't prove it, but my spider-sense is tingling, it's telling me some of them might be getting 'faked'.

edit on 16-9-2011 by SatoriTheory because: (no reason given)

Hahah I knew someone would say that eventually, claiming that the USGS would fake the data. That's just to throw us off the scent no doubt.

Here's the thing. If Elenin is broken up(though no explanation as to what did that), then you're not going to get a 9.0, unless it comes extremely close.

Again, I blame the stupid aliens for interfering(supposedly, the "Krulians" were the ones that blew up Elenin). They're the reason why the skeptics keep "winning."

But, there will be one last shot on Sept 26-28. Let's see if those idiots will stay out this time.

reply to post by Akasirus


Limit significant to 7.0+. Now don't you find it odd that EVERY 7.0+ quakes occur when three celestial bodies line up? Dr Mensur has proven that.

I don't know nothing about no comet, all I know is, we shouldn't be able to predict earthquakes at all, and no matter how many others there are, if we can say five times in a row there have been ones at 188 day intervals, then the fact that there's so much noise vs signal ratio in the discussion speaks for itself -- though what it says, I haven't the first idea, because it's been too successful and I don't have the energy to sift through the noise to find the signal on this one.

So according to the 188 day theory, major earthquakes occur 188 days from each other. The data goes like this:

September 15 2011 7.3 fiji

March 11 2011 9.0 Japan 188 days before 9/15

September 4 2010 New Zealand 7.1 188 days before 3/11

February 27 2010 Chile 8.8 189 days before 9/4

So now I began to subtract further back going plus and minus one day on either side of 188

188 days before 2/27 was August, 23,2009 no major quake

188 days before 8/22 was February 16 2009 no major quake

188 days before 2/16 was August 12, 2008 no major quake

Even though it is fairly weird that recently the 188 day hypothesis has some merit to it, but by going back further you can see that there is as much data debunking it as there is saying it has merit. Personally I dont think there is enough data to either proove or disprove it. Just my 2 cents.

Not really sure what Elenin is but to add, I keep reading that big earthquakes are very common, are you insane? This is the most intense earthquakes have been on human record, there is at least one large earthquake every month these days. It goes a lot with the predictions for 12/21/2012, 2012 is at the 7 years cycle of solar flare activity and is predicted to be the most intense year of solar activity in all of human record. Why does this matter? Solar Flares have been shown to cause drastic effects on earth climate among other things, anyone remember when this thing happened that went and destroyed New Orleans? well it was directly following a large Solar Eruption. Next to that the other big worry is that due to the solar activity and how the Earth Magnetic field works (protects us from things in space like the radiation from the Sun. It is weaker at the polls, in one case a solar eruption knocked out power in Canada. With all the technology these days our big worry should be if a massive solar eruption is shot at earth it could knock out all electronics on the entire planet taking us into the dark ages! P.S. knock on wood as I live in Los Angeles we have been extremely lucky, as a place that has a good hundred minor quakes per day that we haven't had anything like that of the quake back in the 90's.

Originally posted by np6888
reply to post by Akasirus

 

Limit significant to 7.0+. Now don't you find it odd that EVERY 7.0+ quakes occur when three celestial bodies line up? Dr Mensur has proven that.

it's been proven for all 17 7+ quakes this year? link please.

reply to post by np6888


Celestial body is a massivly broad term. Dictionary.com defines it as natural objects visible in the sky. Having three celestial bodies line up is an every day thing.

reply to post by outsidethesquare


Good call my good man. It's like porn. And there's different types of porn watchers. I'll enjoy some pics my lady friend made for me, or a video we made together, I guess you can say I'm more based in reality. And we all know there are the porn addicts out there who just can't get enough if it and they wanna fantasize about as many different women as possible, which isn't realistic. These guys are comparable to the guys who make the YouTube videos and are clearly freaking out about this and are actually instructing people to "get away from California" or whatever... He's like the guy who can't have a real sex life because he's so deep into his fantasy involving 3 women at the same time who he just met and yet they just wanna throw themselves at him... This is the guy not living in reality.

And yet, we gotta hand it to these guys, they sacrifice any chance at a real life (or a good night of real sex with ONE woman), making these crazy YouTube videos (or masturbating furiously for the 7th time in a day to whatever fantasy of the week gets them off) just so we can be entertained for a few moments (sp we can have a great time with a Real woman because thanks to their refusal to accept reality, that leaves more women for those of us who Prefer reality). Thanks guys! *hi five!*

Originally posted by np6888
reply to post by Akasirus

 

Limit significant to 7.0+. Now don't you find it odd that EVERY 7.0+ quakes occur when three celestial bodies line up? Dr Mensur has proven that.

I haven't heard this before, I will have to look into that, thanks.

Some will say this is just another coincidence.

1st - EQ 8.8 , Concepion, Chile

The 188th Verse of Book of Revelation

Rev. 11:13
And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

Originally posted by dpage
Some will say this is just another coincidence.

1st - EQ 8.8 , Concepion, Chile

The 188th Verse of Book of Revelation

Rev. 11:13
And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

edit on 17-9-2011 by dpage because: Correction of phrasing

Except seven thousand men were not slain. ~600 were. And where did this 1 come from, why is it there? Why look at the 188th verse, why not look at Chapter 18 verse 1? Why the book of Revelations and not a different book?

No, it's not a coincidence at all, it's you setting arbitrary rules to artificially correlate the earthquake with this passage.

reply to post by lcbjr1979


New Zealand EQ was 9/3/2010 - not 9/4 -, 188 days after 1st 8.8 Concepion,Chile