Originally posted by Tgautier13
reply to post by alfa1
Your link does nothing to 'debunk' the nature of the quote, however. If anything its trying to obfuscate the original point being made.
Q: Let me ask you specifically about last week's scare here in Washington, and what we might have learned from how prepared we are to deal with that (inaudible), at B'nai Brith.
A: Well, it points out the nature of the threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But as we've learned in the intelligence community, we had something called -- and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even, in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important.
Originally posted by Pervius
Watch the two typhoons headed to China.
Just weeks ago 2 big typhoons were headed to China. Just as the first one got close to their coast....it stopped, turned 90* and headed North to Korea. The one right behind it....turned around 180* and went straight back into the big Pacific.
Originally posted by tracehd1
reply to post by Darkblade71
The glitches, lines, the direction in which the lines are coming/going... In the direction of PRico. circumstantial evidence... I know. But the more circumstantial evidence piles up and points towards the *duck*...what can you say?
Originally posted by subject x
Could someone please explain, preferably in their own words, how a radio transmitter can steer a hurricane?
I see this claim a lot, but nobody ever lays out the science pertaining to how this could be done.
I won't even get into the scale issue (ie- how much power would you need to steer a force that big, were it possible)