It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by smithjustinb
I'm sorry, you'll have to tell me the scripture, book, chapter and verse that says humans are angels.
I can assure you, we are not. Angels dont go around murdering eachother, they cannot die therefore, humans are not angels.
The bible clearly states that angels are messengers. When you seek to use your own rationality to decipher the bible you have already missed the messages contained therein.
Originally posted by XplanetX
reply to post by bogomil
What is wrong with preaching?
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by XplanetX
reply to post by bogomil
What is wrong with preaching?
It's best done from pulpits (or in need soap-boxes); it's not fitted to the dialogue-form of a public, liberal debate-forum.
This said, I'm not in ANY way suggesting formal censorship or restrictions, but use my own individual possibility to counter the preaching-form through my posting,.... expressing my opposition to both the form and content of evangelism.
As an example, I could fill pages with one-way sermons on why pastafarians KNOW the moon is made of green cheese (it was aliens or 'god' what done it) and why this ought to be the predominant ideology on this planet.
Legitimately.
And I would most likely be ignored. That is until the day, when pastafarians have enough power to be a nuisance for society, which (just in case) answer a standard question asked to me regularly: Why do YOU care, Bogo?
And now instead of debating thread tactics, can we try to introduce some factual knowledge of aliens on this thread?edit on 27-8-2011 by bogomil because: paragraphing
Originally posted by XplanetX
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by XplanetX
reply to post by bogomil
What is wrong with preaching?
It's best done from pulpits (or in need soap-boxes); it's not fitted to the dialogue-form of a public, liberal debate-forum.
This said, I'm not in ANY way suggesting formal censorship or restrictions, but use my own individual possibility to counter the preaching-form through my posting,.... expressing my opposition to both the form and content of evangelism.
As an example, I could fill pages with one-way sermons on why pastafarians KNOW the moon is made of green cheese (it was aliens or 'god' what done it) and why this ought to be the predominant ideology on this planet.
Legitimately.
And I would most likely be ignored. That is until the day, when pastafarians have enough power to be a nuisance for society, which (just in case) answer a standard question asked to me regularly: Why do YOU care, Bogo?
And now instead of debating thread tactics, can we try to introduce some factual knowledge of aliens on this thread?edit on 27-8-2011 by bogomil because: paragraphing
So debating is okay but preaching is not legitimate?
E.g. would any species not being hampered in its development by rigid monopoly-religionism or reductionist-materialism develop a psi-'technology', whether that species is corporeal or non-corporeal. And it doesn't necessitate the X-files to see that manifested in the long history of the collective category of anomalies.
Originally posted by dbates
Fascinating topic and one that I find of great interest. Two quick points. The first is as was previously mentioned. While there are some friendly aliens there does seem to be an overbearing theme in alien movies that the aliens will be hostile and attempt to take over the world. I don't know if that our personification of them, trying to make them like us (humans seem to enjoy war) or that we just naturally fear what we don't know. Perhaps there is an agenda even if it's working quietly behind the scenes. I'm willing to say that there does seem to be a bit of push in that direction. Is it conditioning? I'm not sure but that would actually make sense if there is a faction preparing for the eventual return of the creators of life on Earth (We're just following the Bible's story line here). Perhaps "they" know the arrival is going to happen and are preparing by trying to get us on their side of at the very least they want us to dislike their natural enemy too.
My main gripe with all of this isn't actually with the theory itself. What frustrates me the most is that none of this is ever brought up or discussed in church. The book of Revelation and the prophetic verses in Ezekiel, Daniel, and Isaiah are skimmed over as quaint little corners of the Bible. Why don't they have classes to study these things in church? When was the last time you heard a pastor give a sermon on the return of Christ and the battle that will ensue? It's like a forbidden topic in church and most people look at you side-ways if you dare bring it up. I've always found that to be odd. We have a record of Jesus having these discussions with this disciples so it wasn't a topic foreign to Jesus. In modern churches however it's nearly a taboo topic.edit on 8/27/2011 by dbates because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OneNationUnderNot one single movie, book, or song depicts aliens as Demons.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Today, I (whom am missionary baptist) and my collegue (who is a catholic) were discussing the return of Christ to this earth and what might possibly cause the world to unite against him. The answers we came up with was an alien invasion. Now it seems to me that since 1985 when President Reagan convened the entire UN in response to the threat of alien invasions, that there has been an increase in alien invasion movies and television programs from that day forth.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Since then we have seen films such as "Independance Day", "The Fourth Kind", "The Battle for L.A." and televisions programs such as "V", "Earth Final Conflict", and the most recent TNT's "Falling Skies". Over the years we have been slowly conditioned to look up at the skies in anticipation of dread and fear with Astrophysicists like Stephen Hawking crying out that anything that comes from the heavens (stars) would likely be aggressive. This is the great deception that the Son of Perdition has planned in order to decieve the world into following him and his rule, with a promise that if humanity bands together we can drive off any "threats" that come to earth, but he is lying. There will be no salvation for those who take up arms, because it is not aliens that will attack earth, but the Lord of Hosts. He whom was known as Jesus Christ. In the Son of Perditions arrogance he will insight the nations of earth to do battle with the Messiah returned. When Jesus returns
the whole world will be in fear of an alien invasion because, since the early to mid 1900's up till now in 2011 mankind has been conditioned that anything that is not from earth will be aggressive and is to be fought. In their blindness they will turn on the Lord and the armies of hell will be complete and the deception soon after will be revealed.
Keep this topic on task, this is about pertinent information only and no atheist drivel decrying the existence of God, this is not that kind of thread and there are other threads that are more suitable for those replies.edit on 25-8-2011 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
13And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. 14For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. 15Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. 16And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon. - Rev 16
Analyzing this passage in its entirety, it is quite clear that John was not talking about actual frogs but something that to him resembled a frog because of the word "like", and we know frogs don't perform miracles.