It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All Libyans receive a portion of the sale of Libyan oil - Directly to their Bank Accounts.
Max income tax in Libya is 12%.
Banks do not charge interest in Libya (Islamic Bank Model, not the Rothschild Slave System).
All Libyans have a home. Ghaddafi vowed that his parents would not get a house until everyone in Libya had a home. Ghaddafi's father died while he and his wife were still living in a tent.
There are no mortgages on houses in Libya.
Should someone wish to farm, they receive free land and seeds and animals.
There are no Electricity Bills in Libya.
All Education is Free in Libya.
Everyone gets Free Medical - Even the Protestors ...
Each newlywed couple receives 60,000 dinar gift from the government.
Gas in Libya is sold at the outrageous price of .12 cents per liter (bigger than US quart).
Automobile purchases are financed at zero interest.
Ghaddafi completed a massive water project to irrigate land to free Libya from dependance on Imported Food
In the darkest moments of our struggle, when our backs were against the wall, Mumar Ghadaffi stood with us'.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by sonnny1
Yes I did. But last I noted, we're broke. So it certainly isn't profitable.
And before you say "profitable for the rich", realize that such situations, historically at least, almost always lead to a power hungry general more or less slaughtering the rich and taking it, and then almost communisticly giving it back. That's what Caesar did, that what many did. So if you think that the fact it makes them profitable is the goal, you fail to see that within one or two generations, it will result in their undoing.
Originally posted by patternfinder
i don't know, it looks like the pics of the supposed real buildings are compressed inwards and shot from a higher viewing angle while the ones in the supposed fake one is shot at a lower viewing angle with a wider shot..this makes a big difference in how you perceive the differences in the pics......
Note the difference in the dimensions and the height of the arches; the dimensions of the decorative design above the middle arch; the palm tree in the real one and its absence in the fake.
Originally posted by tide88
Originally posted by patternfinder
i don't know, it looks like the pics of the supposed real buildings are compressed inwards and shot from a higher viewing angle while the ones in the supposed fake one is shot at a lower viewing angle with a wider shot..this makes a big difference in how you perceive the differences in the pics......
This is exactly what I was thinking.
Note the difference in the dimensions and the height of the arches; the dimensions of the decorative design above the middle arch; the palm tree in the real one and its absence in the fake.
Look at the two pictures. The alleged real photo is a panoramic photo which stretches the photo making the dimensions different.
As for the palm trees:
We would have to have a date stamp on the photos to even consider the palm trees proof of anything. They could have been removed. How old is that panoramic photo that you claim is the real photo. It could have been taken years ago. Look at the vehicles. They are all cars from the 70's or 80's. You alleged staged set has cars from 2000's. So in 20+ years, you are saying that those Palms weren't removed or died?
As for the Al Jezeera video..
That area was bombed back in June of 2008. As you can see in that photo the pavement and brick looks to be fairly new. Could also be the reason the palm tree is no longer there.
As for the waiving of India's flag:
You do know there are thousands of people from India that worked and were trapped in Tripoli, right? They could be multiple reason for those few people, I count around 8 flags, being waived. One major reason would to stand out in a crowd to let loved ones know they are well.
Now we can move on to the link from the examier:
You do realize that website is basically a blog for independent writers. Look at Debroh Dupre list of articles she has written about. She talks about weapons possibly being the reason for the DC earthquake. Well, were these weapons around in the 1800's too?
I am not saying there isn't propaganda in the news, there is. However to think that they would be this elaborate hoax where they are building movie sets, bad ones according to you, and broadcasting these reports across the globe is a little ridiculous.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
And how do any of those if even true relate to this incident?
That original post was debunked several times already.
There is other threads to discuss matters of OBL etc.
First "flag": So street lights are supposed to illuminate the sky too now? Amazing new technology must be in place. Second "flag": Seems like a poster to your eyes means absolutely nothing. Care to try again?
you have provided no requisite evidence , the colour behind the tower is of the sun setting in the entrance , not of street lighting and above entrance the pitch dark of night . Please provide evidence and related spectral class analysis . combine it from unbiased sources (not western,qatari,russian MSM). preferably alternative media. sources preferable would be indian ,pakistani ,icelandic or any neutral nation's analysis. start again and subject your explanations to greater scrutiny and scientific tools
artifical lighting does not illuminate sky like that only sun set does .Also your sources are western and al jazeera , which i had stated are not acceptable as evidence ,with their clear cut agenda of their govts and controllers, so your sources are not neutral. please provide requisite evidence and with proper scrutiny and explain the fallacies with sources ... you have yet to provide conclusive evidence.the conditions for evidence to be legit are stated in my previous post
Originally posted by USAisdevil
reply to post by wcitizen
wcitizen hes simply avoiding providing proof,you can see it in my posts .he/she tries to throw ball in other person's court and give straw man posts. I have demanded evidence for the nonsense he/she says .
Hes not even provided requisite evidence to prove what he claims .
Originally posted by Etherea
Right... Where are these anti-rebel, pro-Gaddafi news coming from?
Maybe from Russia, China, Brasil and a few others?? Countries that fear their respective slices of that big fat pie called Libya, a pie Gaddafi so 'generously' shared with them, so much wealth going around (all between friends, mind you, with the respective commission here and there), that will most likely go poof! with the new Government, all those little millions being lost forever (for now)? Lol
God, the whole thing is so transparent, sometimes I wonder, reading this site that is supposed to be for 'denying ignorance', to see people defending such a despicable human being, that tortured and killed and maimed, one of the longest, most cruel dictatorships of the world, just because they disagree with the PTB and MSM and all that... Well, it's frustrating and depressing all at once.
*Sigh*