Several Objects Inbound with Elenin. 2 Observatories Confirm ---- Aug 2011 , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 214 times


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 05:48 PM by Wolfenz
Originally posted by Violater1
Wow
Battle L.A. just came to mind








Looks familiar with the Battle L.A. Meteor-Comets /Alien Ships in Outer Space going towards Earth Below
Well the Ones that are Moving and the ones that are Stationary are the Stars



reddragonleo.com...

Ive Thought about that 2

as to what Phage Said then ive Re looked I doubt its a Hot pixel Mess as the

First Picture Shows 3 Objects Moving in 3 frames of the Animated Gif There a Hot Pixel way down at the Bottom Edge to the Left (That is a Hot Pix ! )

The Second Picture
Shows 3 Objects Moving in 4 frames and I see No Noticeable Hot Pix that would grab my Attention

Of the Mains Post
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 8-8-2011 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)
edit on 8-8-2011 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 05:51 PM by Enlightenme1111
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by RUSSO


When the telescope tracks the comet the hot pixels appear to move with the comet. When the telescope does not track the comet and image stacking is used the hot pixels appear in random areas, as seen here:


So you're saying all of the other stationary objects are not hot pixels, and the only hot pixels in these movies are the ones moving? Interesting.


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 05:51 PM by Mr_skepticc
reply to post by Phage



Thats a nice copy and paste job; however, are you really saying anything at all here?


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 05:52 PM by amongus
Originally posted by AzazeI
reply to
post by iamhobo



I love how people star you when they have no clue who i am and long I've been here under many names. Sad how the sheeple are starting to take over the forum


Sad to know you have to post under so many names....and sad that you have to pat yourself on the back for it.

Thats whats sad....


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 05:53 PM by Starwise
Originally posted by AzazeI
reply to
post by iamhobo



I love how people star you when they have no clue who i am and long I've been here under many names. Sad how the sheeple are starting to take over the forum


Under how many names?? BANNED??? Hmmmm very interesting indeed.. Now can we stay on topic instead of getting derailed?


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 05:57 PM by Darkblade71
Originally posted by Starwise
reply to
post by Phage



Phage! I knew there had to be an explanation!



But is it the correct one? That is the question.

I don't think it is that unusual for a comet to come in pieces, we saw it with the shoemaker levy comet.

Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 was discovered by Carolyn and Gene Shoemaker and David Levy in a photograph taken on March 18, 1993 with the 0.4-meter Schmidt telescope at Mt. Palomar. The comet was in orbit around Jupiter with a period of about 2 years, and last made a close approach to Jupiter on July 7, 1992, at a distance of approximately 0.38 Jupiter radii (71,400 km) above the cloud tops. Approximately 1.5 to 2.2 hours after closest approach, the comet (which was presumably a single body at the time) was broken apart by tidal forces into at least 21 pieces.


Shoemaker-Levy 9

Any comet has the potential to come apart or in pieces.

Often times if you look at meteor impact craters you will see what appears to be two or three craters close to each other, so it doesn't take a genius to figure out that space rocks and space ice often come in pieces or clusters.

So I guess the question is, is there any sort of comment from official sources that says this is just a glitch? or artifact?


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 05:59 PM by Phage
reply to post by Enlightenme1111


It depends. We are dealing with two things at the same time; image stacking and the tracking of the comet.

The stationary objects are stars.
When the comet is being tracked by the telescope from image to image the hot pixels do not appear to move (much) relative to it.

When the comet is not being tracked from image to image, and the images are stacked, the hot pixels appear to move relative to it.


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 06:01 PM by Phage
reply to post by Darkblade71


Shoemaker-Levy 9 broke up because it passed deep into the gravity well of Jupiter and tidal forces caused it to disintegrate. The distinctive "string of pearls" was clearly visible.

Elenin has not and will not pass close enough to anything to have caused this to happen.


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 06:03 PM by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by Darkblade71


Shoemaker-Levy 9 broke up because it passed deep into the gravity well of Jupiter and tidal forces caused it to disintegrate. The distinctive "string of pearls" was clearly visible.

Elenin has not and will not pass close enough to anything to have caused this to happen.



At least, nothing we can see or know about.


reply posted on 8-8-2011 @ 06:03 PM by Lil Drummerboy
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by Darkblade71


Shoemaker-Levy 9 broke up because it passed deep into the gravity well of Jupiter and tidal forces caused it to disintegrate. The distinctive "string of pearls" was clearly visible.

Elenin has not and will not pass close enough to anything to have caused this to happen.
And at what distance will Elenin pass..
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^