It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
was to setup the premise for the question
My question is: Do you agree or disagree, that among your peers, there's an acceptance of police brutality towards citizens?
I don't believe that you would have felt that having one of your questions side-stepped would be an acceptable
Originally posted by semperfortis
reply to post by Evil_Santa
was to setup the premise for the question
You wish to debate? Do not "Set Up" anything. I've been here quite a long time and even have some reputation in the debate forum; I will not be baited or led thank you.
My question is: Do you agree or disagree, that among your peers, there's an acceptance of police brutality towards citizens?
Disagree; among my peers.
I don't believe that you would have felt that having one of your questions side-stepped would be an acceptable
This is ATS
Just because someone does not answer the "way you want", does not mean they did not answer. I answered you. I am not familiar with the area, the department or the incident "you" say happened.
Semper
Originally posted by semperfortis
You wish to debate? Do not "Set Up" anything. I've been here quite a long time and even have some reputation in the debate forum; I will not be baited or led thank you.
Originally posted by masqua
reply to post by mustard seed
The one thing that really burns me is when members keep throwing our moderator status into our collective faces. When I post a thread, I do so to let my opinions be known as a MEMBER.
My take on current LE practices has been posted in this thread and it was pretty much brushed off with a minor comment. How come you didn't throw 'Supermoderator' in my face? Was it because I disagreed with Semp?
edit on 24/6/11 by masqua because: spllng
Originally posted by NuroSlam
Originally posted by semperfortis
You wish to debate? Do not "Set Up" anything. I've been here quite a long time and even have some reputation in the debate forum; I will not be baited or led thank you.
Its interesting that you should bring up your reputation on the forums, I will start by saying I had no idea that you were a LEO.
You closed down a thread that I had started on the grounds that it was a duplicate of another one, you then said that you allowed other mods to review it and they agreed and I gave you the benefit of the doubt. The thread you referenced was dealing with a specific incident involving video taping LEO's. I noticed both the cop hater and cop love came out in droves and no real attempt was being made to address the issue so I started a thread about the issue. A very pleasant discussion ensued between myself and a LA training officer. At no point was there any form of animosity shown between either of us. I asked a number of questions in the OP and he calmly and rationally answered them which led to more questions and answers. The mutual respect was very apparent between both of us, very little hate/love from anyone else.
I accepted your reason for shutting down the thread. When I saw this thread and then saw who started it I realised why you shut my thread down, You are a LEO and you did not like the direction of the thread, you then flexed your "muscles" by shutting it down and starting one in which you could dictate the tone, You ask why I have little respect for people like you, look in the mirror, and now I'm going to ask you to be fair, just, even handed and intellectually honest and shut this thread down as it is exactly in the same vain as my thread.edit on 24-6-2011 by NuroSlam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OverMan
I would agree with you yet this thread is informative regardless of the obvious BAITING.
Sometimes it is fun to grab a hook and pull a fisherman under
Freedom of speech is what it is always about and I support the rights of these "swine" to speak!
They did you wrong... do not go on then loving our hangman... my friend.
in my personal experience it is because it brings out the worst in people. ever notice how when someone breaks out a camera at a party people go stupid acting like retards to get on camera? same principal. except it turns violent lots of times.
just like any work force you have good and bad here. the problem is that there is just such a higher level of bad that you can go with this job. we are given an INCREDIBLE amount of power and responsibilities. you can do great things or you can do horrendous things. it all depends on the type of person that you are. myself personally depending ont he siutuation, if it is a bad enough scene and i catch you videoing the scene dont think i wont sieze your camera and copy the video if i think i will need that as part of my evidence in the prosecution. and depending on what you have on it you may or may not get your video back. some things are not released back due to laws and common sense.
they stay on the force because many higher ups do not take the recommendation from their training officers and keep them until something bad happens. you know how accountants work. all they can see is the cost of training another one and figure they wont do anything that bad. then they do. believe me it frustrate me to no ends sometimes
a lot of people think they know the law but really dont. i have been doing this for 12 years and i dont know more than half. and most of that is just the common stuff that i use everyday.
i understand your issue with the life and death thing. however administrators are the same no matter where you work. same with bean counters. i think they should be personally held responsible when something bad happens. i know i keep copies of everything i recommend to them. if one of the idiots that gets through the system does make that fatal mistake i would hate to think what would happen if those documents ever got "misplaced" where they coul dbe found.