It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ObvTruth
reply to post by greeneyedleo
No wait til Nancy Grace gets on tonight....That will be something
Originally posted by ObvTruth
reply to post by greeneyedleo
Really? Shes kinda funny especially when it comes to this trial. Shes going to have a fit tonightedit on 5-7-2011 by ObvTruth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jerryznv
Revenge is not justice...Casey is innocent of murder...
Now if we are seeking revenge it is time to put the real murderer on trial...
That will be coming soon...
The law did what was right today...Casey is guilty of being a terrible person...but she is not a murderer...
I have never thought so and I think the right verdict was handed down!
Jury's are not immune to being stupid.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Hey...now Casey has the rest of her life to spend finding out who killed her daughter....
right?
yeah right...that will never happen...
edit on July 5th 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sparky63
Just because the jury found her innocent doesn't mean that she is innocent. She is going to be guilty in the eyes of most people. Jury's are not immune to being stupid.
Originally posted by Daughter2
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Hey...now Casey has the rest of her life to spend finding out who killed her daughter....
right?
yeah right...that will never happen...
edit on July 5th 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)
I don't think this is like OJ - She claimed it was an accident.
Originally posted by ObvTruth
reply to post by greeneyedleo
I dont know what saved her but something devine happened to save this girl. Or ''God' was completely absent through out this whole thing.
Originally posted by jerryznv
reply to post by Sparky63
Jury's are not immune to being stupid.
You are correct...they are not immune to being stupid...I see stupid people all the time...they are everywhere...but in this case I think it is too soon to call anyone stupid...we have yet to hear anything from the jurors...don't you think we should hold judgment until they have a chance to tell us why they voted as they did?
Or should we just go strait to convicting them of being stupid...seems to be a trend around here...conviction and burning at the stake without hearing all sides?
Originally posted by Sparky63
No, I am going straight to convicting them of being stupid... Just like the first OJ verdict proved that that jury was stupid.
You can't be afraid of calling a spade a spade.