It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
To add, in my opinion situations like this could be less violent if store owners and security were allowed to defend thier property with firearms like the Korean community did in Los Angles during the riots of 1992. When the police fail to protect property and person the citizens of this nation should be allowed to defend it, lethal or otherwise.edit on 17-6-2011 by Jocko Flocko because: (no reason given)
I'm so glad to hear people like you own guns; those who think it's reasonable to shoot people to "defend your property".
Send the bill to the stadium, or the national broadcasting networks, they don't seem to be complaining about the price tags attached to the events.
Better yet, get the rioters to pay for it..
Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
I'm so glad to hear people like you own guns; those who think it's reasonable to shoot people to "defend your property".
And why shouldn't it be? Oh, let me guess, in liberal la la land the average law abiding citizen who owns a shop with quite a large amount of stock value inside should just sit back and let troglodytes burn, destroy and loot at will? If some imbecile from the city ever came onto my property and tried to burn down my house with me in it, he/she is either going to be going home with either a severe limp or to the city morgue, sorry thats the way it is.
And why on earth would the people hosting the event or the networks covering them be forced to pay for any property damage caused by rioters? I'm not seeing your logic?
No leap there, just "stealing and looting", "trying to kill me", same thing, right?
Because the stadium is the reason that everyone is in that area of the city... they are a huge venue sucking outrageous ticket prices out of drunken fans then unleashing them onto the streets in fits of rage, something an independent bar owner would never get away with. The MSM will collectively make far more money covering the riot and aftermath of such than the actual damages done to the city, and then get a tax break at the end of the year so that none of that money gets recirculated to fix the actual problem.
Originally posted by Raist
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
I really do not feel I need to know what a Canuck is to understand stupid drunken riots. All I needed to know was it was about a foolish sports game that idiots got worked up over.
BTW hockey is a sport not a religion, no matter how badly some want it to be.
Jocko Flocko-
Sorry for being off topic but most liberals I know and the ones I attended Ryerson University with are/were dead set against gun ownership in Canada and the majority of them vote liberal or NDP...
You didn't answer my question either. Do you support the blatant destruction of peoples personal property and/or person be it either a bunch of drunken moronic idiots after a hockey game acting like little cry babies, or in other situations like G20/G8 protests?
To add, in my opinion situations like this could be less violent if store owners and security were allowed to defend thier property with firearms like the Korean community did in Los Angles during the riots of 1992. When the police fail to protect property and person the citizens of this nation should be allowed to defend it, lethal or otherwise.
And why on earth would the people hosting the event or the networks covering them be forced to pay for any property damage caused by rioters? I'm not seeing your logic?
Ok, sorry. If I was sitting in my yard and had access to my rifle I wouldn't sit back and watch some piece of human garbage try and burn down my house, better?
Some people will try and put the responsibility on someone else rather than the idiots commiting the crimes and it's outrageous.
I keep reading your posts, and you keep making the same assumptions over again. First of all, Canada is a federation of provinces. Every province has varying culture, and it changes greatly between BC and Ontario. Your "liberals" are not the same as ours.
For instance, most leftist-minded people in BC don't even vote. They don't care about politics and they think even talking about it is retarded, which considering modern Canada, I can almost agree with.
So labelling Canadians based on who they vote for is a sad assessment, in my opinion, because the true "liberals" of this country aren't fooled by this sham democracy of ours and would rather live free than vote for to be free.
It's a riot. Get over yourself.
Everyone knew it was going to happen; most probably left their vehicles out there just to get the insurance.
And do you considering big business stores to be personal property? Because I don't. They're corporate property, and as so they are subject to OUR culture. If they don't want to get hit up in a riot every few years, then reconsider another venue location.
And even if they were, it's just collateral damage and insurance should cover it all.
Los Angeles? We aren't Yankies.
Do you have any idea of the reprecussions if anybody got shot during the Vancouver riot (and nobody did)? You can talk tough all you want, but you wouldn't be shooting into a crowd of 100,000 people if you didn't expect to wind up dead yourself while invoking actual violence in the riot.
By the way, since when does destruction to private property become violence?
Ryerson University in TORONTO, ONTARIO?
1) They were charging over $1000 for seats to see the game.
2) Everyone knew this was going to happen.
3) It's the right thing to do considering the millions made from the event, unless the executives can't part with their bonuses.
WTF are you talking about? This isn't about you sitting in your yard, this is about 100,000 people in the streets of Vancouver. Ever been in Vancouver during a riot or other celebrations (like Canada Day or 420)?
Yeah, some people would pin the responsibility on someone else. This coming from the guy who wants severe penalties for the rioters while not even trying to understand why 100,000 people were on the streets rioting in the first place
Human garbage, eh? These are your fellow citizens that you're talking about, don't ever forget that.
"These were people who came equipped with masks, goggles and gasoline, even fire extinguishers that they would use as weapons," Chu said in the aftermath of riots that brought shame to an entire nation Thursday.
Police said almost 100 people have been arrested and 387 incidents have been reported throughout the city ranging from fires to medical injuries.
Chu apologized to business owners who became the victims of rioters, but defended the police's tactical decision to focus on public safety and suppress the riot by dispersing the crowd, rather than rushing to hotspots as crowds attacked stores.
He described the instigators as anarchists and criminals who appeared to be the same people involved in the pre-Olympic demonstrations and noted police saw many equipped with goggles, gasoline and other tools to create damage.
Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
I have been from Vancouver to St Johns, I have been all over Canada many times in my life and the political spectrum is very similar, it was 20 years ago and it still is today.
Which is quite sad as everyone SHOULD be voting in this country, without doing so the proper parties aren't getting into power. Why would debating politics be "retarded"? It's only retarded when your typical uneducated CBC brainwashed Canadian starts spouting anti American drivel and you are constantly having to correct them, then it gets tiresome.
Can you define a true Liberal in Canada?
The blatant destruction of property is not acceptable be it corporate, personal or municipal and in the end only seeks to acomplish one thing; robbing hard working individuals of their hard earned money.
especially when those same retards don't even have the brain power to vote.
Thats sad but at the same time typical of todays generation in this country. The "ah, someone else will pay for it" mentality is far to apparent these days however it's to be expected in this country with it's nanny state social policies. Don't worry, someone else will pay the bill. PATHETIC.
. You should know that as you told me you were denied a firearm because of our pathetic backward system that basically stops law abiding citizens from protecting themselves
I disagree. The fact of the matter is if shop-keepers and security were allowed to defend their property with firearms I do believe the deterrent factor **might** detour a few morons from destroying property. Even a shop-keeper standing on the roof of his shop with a 12 guage shotgon loaded with rubber batons would suffice, a couple of those things in the stomach would quickly get the point across.
You're kidding right? You are what age again?
Btw, you still never answered the question Dimiti. AGAIN!
Do you support the blatant destruction of peoples personal property and/or person be it either a bunch of drunken moronic idiots after a hockey game acting like little cry babies, or in other situations like G20/G8 protests?
1) Stay HOME and watch it on TV and let those who can afford it have a nice night out
2)Right.....
3)So let me get this straight, because I want to make sure you honestly think this way. You want the executives to pay for the damages caused by these idiots because they are just a bunch of angry little cry babies who have no respect for personal property and no respect for the law and think that executives make to much money? "Hey you big bad executives! Drop ticket prices or else we will riot and destroy personal property!" WOW. Are you one of those "anarchist" guys by any chance? It would explain quite a bit if so...
Yup, vile disgusting human garbage. I would go as far as to say that those folks should have their organs removed and donated to people on wait lists, better? good!
And here's an even better question for you. Do you think that all the money in Canada made by big companies should be divided up evenly among Canadians?
Rioters Disguised as Canucks Fans
Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
reply to post by TheOrangeBrood
No leap there, just "stealing and looting", "trying to kill me", same thing, right?
Ok, sorry. If I was sitting in my yard and had access to my rifle I wouldn't sit back and watch some piece of human garbage try and burn down my house, better?
Because the stadium is the reason that everyone is in that area of the city... they are a huge venue sucking outrageous ticket prices out of drunken fans then unleashing them onto the streets in fits of rage, something an independent bar owner would never get away with. The MSM will collectively make far more money covering the riot and aftermath of such than the actual damages done to the city, and then get a tax break at the end of the year so that none of that money gets recirculated to fix the actual problem.
This has got to be one of the silliest things I have ever read, sorry man, I don't see your logic at all. It's basically like saying Budweiser should have to pay the families of drunk driving victims becasue a few idiotic drivers don't obey the law, lets nerf the whole world shall we? You are really missing the whole massive point of personal accountability here. Some people will try and put the responsibility on someone else rather than the idiots commiting the crimes and it's outrageous.
20 years ago is 20 years ago. It is not the same.
What does the CBC have to do with anything? CBC is anti-American?
Most people aren't interested in Canadian politics because, if you've ever studied it before like I have, you might realize that it is so full of burearocracy and rules and other BS that you need specific schooling just to understand part of it.
The other reason is that most politicians are shapeless, formless talking-heads for private interests that no common citizen really cares about (for example, Stephen Harper and the American North American agenda).
Why don't people vote? Because it's a sham. It is laughable to think that you can make a difference by voting here. Our system is so old and archiac that you can be considered a "majority" leader by obtaining roughly 30% of the Canadian vote.
You seem to have this hard on for believing that the conservatives believe in freer gun laws. They most certainly do not want us to be armed.
Yeah, because the transnational corporate owners work very hard to make a profit, right? The only thing that they work hard at is lobbying our government for more power and money, at our expense.
This brings this discussion full circle. All of these rioters happen to live on "sustenance wages" and like anyone with half of a brain, they felt robbed for investing so much of their time and precious money into a massive failure while the people running the event profited big time.
But I guess all of the managers and corporate executives and hockey players worked hard for their millions, harder than the rioters who maybe earn 2000-5000 a month.
Don't worry, they see the people who vote as retards for having so much faith in a system that they will never be able to influence by following the system's rules.
Do you have any idea how much profit insurance companies rake in, mostly just from fighting all the legitimate claims that they can with superior lawyers? I don't think any businesses affected will have much problem proving their case with all of the footage.
Actually my situation goes far beyond that. I trained, applied, and even paid for my PAL so I could have a gun so I can go hunting (I am also licensed for that). Unfortunately, there's a record on me somewhere on some government database that states that I am a menace to society. It's not a criminal record either.
You know what would be a real deterant? Standing in front of your property and using communication. Where were the corporate owners in Vancouver? Nowhere to be seen, because like you they refuse to see these rioters as fellow people, and more like problems that need a solution.
Claiming that destroying property is violence is just so wrong in so many ways. First off, you're basically giving more power to corporations to protect their interests. Secondly, you're giving more power to police to arrest you and put you in jail for violence when you've never intended (mens rea) or acted (actus rea) to hurt anyone.
Destroying personal property has nothing to do with hurting anyone (especially in terms of a riot). Damn rights I support it during a riot.
These people can do whatever they want or please. It is their freedom. This isn't some elitist sport where only the rich are allowed to attend (just like how the RCMP fenced off the olympic sites to keep away the locals).
Sounds like a legitimate reason to me.
I am a conscience human engaged in class war, with dreams of what the world can do when we purge money and all its greed-filled bastard warpigs with it.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
So your an anarchist then....
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
So your an anarchist then....
An anarchist is somebody who engages in populist reactionism, usually because they don't understand the system and would rather fight it tooth and nail.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by Xcathdra
No X, this guy is something else entirely.
He doesn't care about property rights. He's basically a communist who enjoys chaos and destruction but certainly isn't an anarchist.