Originally posted by anon72
Is the media going after Rick Santorum? NO
Is the media going after Newt-even after a huge part of his senios staff QUIT? NO
Is the medai ripping Ron Paul apart? NO
Is the media tearing into Herman Cain? NO
Is the media clobbering the "leader" of the Republican field-Rommey? NO-actually prasing him... ugh
Anyone else... other than PALIN-on such a large scale?
Think about it. They FEAR PALIN. And, for those of you who have bought into it-the whole BS mess.... Doom on you. Open your eyes for pete's
Do you really want four more years of what Obama has done and is offering more of? He's FAILED.
You have to understand the real nature of the gender war to understand why the Media is going after her hard core. (I am going to get around to
writing an essay on it. So I can copy and paste, rewriting on the fly is horrible)
Basically the gender war isn't about men, young men or boy's at all. America since it's inception has pretty much been a traditionalist matriarchy. At
first there was no problem because as an agrarian nation leftist women had some sense of fulfillment(both men,women and children worked hard in their
own way's) and frankly spoken no other choice period. Physical reality dictated more how men and women lived then any law or ideal.
Then came industrialization and the same concept of the entire family working came into play. Traditionalist women hated that, they hated working
in factories and the dangers of it. Beginning as early as the 1840's-50's traditionalist women began to create the "ideal of womanhood". Our notions
of women originate from that time period(that women are by default nurturing, empathic, yadda-yadda-yadda).
Nothing really happened until men got tired of being over worked and under payed and began the first labor movements. After that women
latched onto it and began to take up the plight of Children. They pushed for Child labor law's to get children out of the factories so they would have
a social justification to stay at home.
Around this time they also stabbed the men's labor movement in the back. Men where stuck working 16+ hours a day, with slightly better(but
still lousy pay) pay and still in grossly unsafe conditions. This wouldn't be remedied until almost a 100 years later.
Anyways to get back on point, around this time traditionalist women realized that if they wanted to stay at home "their husbands"(traditionalist women
may be loyal but there is some truth to feminist studies that show traditionalist women hate men more. They regard their husband and men in general to
be domesticated animals,slaves[don't believe me look up Mothers of the Republic literature, it is in their own words]) would need easy access to
So it sank in to traditionalist women that in order to get what they want all women had to be removed from the work force. It was traditionalist
women like Palin who chased women out of the workforce in the 1800's to early 1900's. They protested, complained and other things.
Fast forward to the 60's-70's and the ideals of traditionalism waned and liberal, leftist women began to become a legitimate competing force due to
numbers, but mostly due to the change in the nature of our physical reality thanks to technology.
They made great strides but hit a road block when they tried to pass the ERA(Equal Rights Amendment). Traditionalist women mustered the last of
their strength because they where absolutely terrified of losing their gender privilege and shot the ERA down.
Since then leftist women have taken a dual strategy of poisoning the traditional matriarchy's well, aka the war on boy's. And of pushing for equality
via other methods. Gender raunch plays a role( destroy traditionalist notions about the nature of women), but their primary method is advocating
female supremacy in everything and near total male emasculation(so traditionalist women won't want them and so males in general want nothing to do
with traditionalist "cave dwelling" women).
To that end they worked to completely destroy and annihilate all male support systems(clubs, groups, sports clubs, any organization that might enable
I guess they figure if they push the pendulum far enough by the time it re balances so many generations(at this point probably take 2-4
generations for males to achieve meaningful equality) would have gone by that most of what they have done would stick and traditionalist women would
But feminist's didn't count on a meaningful MRM at all. They are just scrabbling together now in an attempt to co-opt it(changing their own message
to be less hostile to males, and setting up puppets:[A perfect example is the "Good Men Project", a disgusting attempt by leftist's to hijack the MRM
after we just got done kicking traditionalist's to the curb]).
Anyways Palin represents a very, very serious threat to their plans. While Bachmann is more of a moderate traditionalist, Center-right. Not a threat
to them at all. If anything she may aid in their attempts by being a "good role model" to both leftist and rightist women, but I am going off course
Take it or leave it, but this is the reason why.
P.S if Romney wins I am leaving the Republican party! And I doubt I will be the only one.
edit on 14-6-2011 by korathin because: ekk put "Republic" Party instead of "Republican" Party