It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You can't "make" a baby believe anything either.
You cannot "make" someone believe anything. Their belief is up to them.
Correct, but that's their choice you cannot "make" the choice for them.
Of course we can't MAKE or FORCE people to believe one way or the other.
Okay, which personality am I talking to now? I've been saying this ^^^ since page one!!!!!
Sure, we can, but that's not what the OP asked for. The OP asked for someone to "make" him/her believe. That's not possible.
No, not "again", the first time you asked I had no idea what Q you were asking about because you didn't specify
Madness didn't ask me anything for one thing, he told me what he wanted me to do to satisfy his wants and desires.
He wanted me to articulate something to make him feel better and to give him a more pleasant web experience.
Here, if you really think it's possible to "make" someone believe something with a good argument them "make" me believe Atheism is true.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by awake_and_aware
If I'm wrong A&A, "make" me believe Atheism is true.
The burden of proof is always on the person asserting something. Shifting the burden of proof, a special case of Argumentum ad Ignorantiam, is the fallacy of putting the burden of proof on the person who denies or questions the assertion. The source of the fallacy is the assumption that something is true unless proven otherwise.
EXAMPLE:
"OK, so if you don't think the grey aliens have gained control of the US government, can you prove it?"
This argument states that should one event occur, so will other harmful events. There is no proof made that the harmful events are caused by the first event.
EXAMPLE:
"If we legalize marijuana, then more people would start to take crack and heroin, and we'd have to legalize those too. Before long we'd have a nation full of drug-addicts on welfare. Therefore we cannot legalize marijuana."
The straw man fallacy is when you misrepresent someone else's position so that it can be attacked more easily, knock down that misrepresented position, then conclude that the original position has been demolished. It's a fallacy because it fails to deal with the actual arguments that have been made.
"To be an atheist, you have to believe with absolute certainty that there is no God. In order to convince yourself with absolute certainty, you must examine all the Universe and all the places where God could possibly be. Since you obviously haven't, your position is indefensible."
The above straw man argument appears at about once a week on the net.
The other reason I'll kindly keep to myself if u don't mind.
Surely someone can persuade me. I still have faith in you guys.
Of course I used the word "persuade", I've stated numerous times that no one can "make" someone believe something.
Of course we can't MAKE or FORCE people to believe one way or the other.
Okay, which personality am I talking to now? I've been saying this ^^^ since page one!!!!!
That's why i said "OF COURSE" - It didn't even need to be said.
I left atheism and Evolution
That sounds, what's the word.. retarded.
Then why are you chastizing me for being precise and using the term "persuade"? Should I have said "convince"?
who believed in molecules-to-man Evolution if I never "challenged my beliefs."
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by awake_and_aware
Is it stardust these days? When I was in school they taught we came from rocks that were rained on for a very long time.
So you're saying we don't come from rocks???
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by awake_and_aware
Is it stardust these days? When I was in school they taught we came from rocks that were rained on for a very long time.
So you're saying we don't come from rocks???
I'm 65.
Even I know its Stardust.