It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by ObvTruth
The Ancients must of saw something. If the Ancients are drawing animals that they see why would they be hallucinating about seeing something like a UFO?
So where are the drawings of the ET spaceships......after all they must have got a pretty close up look at them?
Originally posted by Imtor
Oh and OP (and all anti-Ancient Astronaut theory) explain why these pictures exist please. ... Oh now you're saying they aren't fake ok good, so then how would you explain it huh?
Originally posted by Turiddu
reply to post by Imtor
The point is that these images are centuries old. We have no idea what is being portrayed in these images so it is silly to think they are displaying "alien" spacecraft when it is far more likely that they are showing religious imagery of various kinds.
By labeling skeptics as "trolls" you are only proving that you realize your own evidence is weak and you need to shift the argument onto fictional "trolls" to justify your misguided beliefs.edit on 20-6-2011 by Turiddu because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Blue Shift
These are artistic representations of things like the power of God rippling down through the clouds (like they would in water), or of flying boats out of somebody's imagination. They're not photos of real things that happened, any more than St. George really fighting a huge reptile that breathes fire.
Repeat until you get it: "Artistic Imagination." "Not Photo Realism." "Symbolic Representation."
Nurnberg picture is what people SAW that time, it was depiction of an event that happened
…the dreadful apparition filled the morning sky with cylindrical shapes from which emerged black, red, orange and blue-white spheres that darted about. Between the spheres, there were crosses with the color of blood. This frightful spectacle was witnessed by “numerous men and women.” Afterwards, a black, spear-like object appeared.
Originally posted by Imtor
Oh and OP (and all anti-Ancient Astronaut theory) explain why these pictures exist please:
www.crystalinks.com...
All the works drawing such things is on the link above. How did people frm centuries ago know about these? photoshop again? LoL! So in London, also in Italian museums and catherdrals they are putting photoshopped what... pieces of art? Oh now you're saying they aren't fake ok good, so then how would you explain it huh?
Originally posted by Imtor
Originally posted by Turiddu
reply to post by Imtor
The point is that these images are centuries old. We have no idea what is being portrayed in these images so it is silly to think they are displaying "alien" spacecraft when it is far more likely that they are showing religious imagery of various kinds.
By labeling skeptics as "trolls" you are only proving that you realize your own evidence is weak and you need to shift the argument onto fictional "trolls" to justify your misguided beliefs.edit on 20-6-2011 by Turiddu because: (no reason given)
No one is saying 'Aliens' it is clearly UFOs, the same kind of disc shaped object seen today and hey - the US Military didn't exist centuries ago. How can you call objects looking the same as today's descriptions expressions of art? Reports of cylindrical objects, discs, the Nurnberg texts talk about these cylinders releasing small orbs from them, again if you have made any research on UFOs as it seems you haven't you would know that matches today's descriptions.
Excuse me? My weak evidence is not my theory at all, Im merely on the side of AAT who I believe have a lot more depth research than all posted here by shallow 'skeptics'.
Originally posted by Blue Shift
These are artistic representations of things like the power of God rippling down through the clouds (like they would in water), or of flying boats out of somebody's imagination. They're not photos of real things that happened, any more than St. George really fighting a huge reptile that breathes fire.
Repeat until you get it: "Artistic Imagination." "Not Photo Realism." "Symbolic Representation."
Artistic representations? Maybe you need to repeat word by word. Did you not read? Nurnberg picture is what people SAW that time, it was depiction of an event that happened. Christopher Columbus also there is a picture of an object on his way to America, again is it art? And I didn't go in details some of these cases like the King on a horse pointing to an object also is art?
Some of the pictures represent real events and you are telling me, they draw a disk, cylinders with properties of today's reports just as symbolism? You fail, sorry.edit on 20-6-2011 by Imtor because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
It doesn't prove that these craft landed, the occupants genetically modified apes to create modern humans, and then we worshiped them as gods. Especially considering that all of these pictures are from after 1000 AD. How can we expect these artists to be accurately depicting events that took place over a thousand years before they were born?
Originally posted by Phage
Sounds kind of like a fireworks display.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ButterCookie
Try this.
www.sitchiniswrong.com...
That doesn't prove anything other than some people would LOVE for Sitchin to be wrong.
I ask again, list me ONE thing that he has been proven to be wrong about?
Originally posted by ButterCookie
reply to post by Phage
OMG.....
Anyways
To you dear Phage, the OP and anyone else who wished for the AAT to be wrong,
if ET's did not travel to our planet in our very distant past (AND CREATE US), how then do you suppose that humans were created?
Oh I stress the emphasis on the word CREATED because that is what the very bible ( or any other biblical text) states when describing human origin.
Anxiously awaiting........