It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by firepilot
Do you find it all odd, that you admit you believe, with no evidence to support it?
Originally posted by harryhaller
reply to post by firepilot
Yeah agreed totally!!
Just like those disinfo "experts" who are ALWAYS around to DEBUNK everything in sight with their advanced and superior knowledge of EVERYTHING.
You ladies are protesting too much, does it give ya a kick? Does it?
Originally posted by harryhaller
reply to post by firepilot
Just like those disinfo "experts" who are ALWAYS around to DEBUNK everything in sight with their advanced and superior knowledge of EVERYTHING.
You ladies are protesting too much, does it give ya a kick? Does it?
Originally posted by harryhaller
If Wilhelm Reich and his orgone ideas were wrong, why was he so completely destroyed by the govt?
And why now, several decades later are other people with no scientific training, able to echo his discoveries by themselves?
And why are you such an arrogant person about your presumed knowledge? Even the comments about "drivel" show the total superiority complex you carry into this conversation.
Have you ever created a "cloud/chembuster" device?
Have you ever attempted any experiments in attempting to define non-"normal" energies?
Have you ever spoken with people who create such devices, and use them?
Have you ever seen clearly results which confound "science"?
I have, and while i can hardly claim to know everything, such as you do, i certainly know that you don't know you are wrong. So, where to from here?
Now go clear your mind, may i suggest a simple orgone device, made from resin, metal shaving and double terminated crystals, and perhaps you can see for yourself that you were mistaken.
Otherwise we'll have to resort to your methods of debate which involve mockery, arrogance, cocksuredness and ignorance.
Originally posted by harryhaller
Sorry, but weather modification by cloud seeding and other forms of atmospheric modulation very much are part of science, and science is about openness and discovery.
Originally posted by Uncinus
So why don't you create a demonstration showing how orgone works? You could revolutionize science.
Originally posted by harryhaller
Originally posted by Uncinus
So why don't you create a demonstration showing how orgone works? You could revolutionize science.
Because i don't have the money. I've been trying to save about $100 to get started with this lot, but life's expensive lately. It's that simple. Thanks for a decent suggestion. I've seen a few setups though, some nice devices that people have made.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Consider that in any large city there are going to be some orgone generators pointing at the sky. So why is the sky not always blue?
Originally posted by harryhaller
Originally posted by Uncinus
So why don't you create a demonstration showing how orgone works? You could revolutionize science.
Because i don't have the money. I've been trying to save about $100 to get started with this lot, but life's expensive lately. It's that simple. Thanks for a decent suggestion. I've seen a few setups though, some nice devices that people have made.
Aloysius, you're apparently an expert on drivel, do continue And until you actually investigate the subject of the OP's post, you have nothing but your own premisconceptions to batter the rest of us with.
It's not even like you've tried it and it's failed, you haven't even looked. That's a fail.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
No - that's asking for some evidence - these "machines" exist, and so there should be some documented and repeatable results azvailable to show their effectiveness.....if they are effective at all.
There is none.
Concluding that they do not work is therefoer a logical conclusion.
A "fail" is to insist that they do work without evidence to back up your claim. Persisting in such a claim when the continual lack of evidence it is pointed out, reduces the claim to drivel (IMO of course )
Originally posted by harryhallerCuriously, we never see contrails, of any sort in our skies.
Originally posted by harryhaller
I will agree that there is NOT a lot of "peer reviewed scientific studies" done on the subject, i put that down to bias against "pseudo science", or anything that they deem such. It does NOT render an entire branch of study invalid. Also, define an experiment that could not be debunked by people such as yourself?