It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by MiloNickels
you're forgetting the other possibility: they'll just fake the original, and even when it is shown to be a gigantic fraud, people will blindly believe...but not for long, more and more are waking upedit on 26-5-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by MiloNickels
you're forgetting the other possibility: they'll just fake the original, and even when it is shown to be a gigantic fraud, people will blindly believe...but not for long, more and more are waking upedit on 26-5-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Mod Note: Title edit
Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire has filed a subpoena that still needs approval from the D.C. District Court in order to be binding.edit on 25-5-2011 by dbates because: Title Edit
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Wow. Just wow. I wonder how Obama et al are going to get out of THIS one! I guess even the judge wasn't fooled by Obama's forged long form!
Originally posted by MiloNickels
reply to post by TrueAmerican
This obviously isn't going to happen. Something will prevent it. Here are some ideas... which do you think it will be?
- The issuing judge will inexplicably change his mind and throw the case out.
- Director Fuddy will suddenly die a strange death.
- The Hawaii Health Department will have a mysterious fire that destroys the document.
- A burglar (who the media will say is a "birther") will break into the Hawaii Health Department and steal the document.
- The document will simply cease to exist, just as it had never existed until April of this year. This is the typical Orwellian tactic whereby they'll say, "what birth certificate? Obama never said there was a birth certificate. We've always been at war with Eastasia"
edit on 5/26/2011 by MiloNickels because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Pseudonaut
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
In any case, the judge will probably be overruled by someone somewhere. Isn't that always how this goes?
Yes, and that's how it's supposed to go. Our entire political system is set up with a system of checks and balances, so that things like this can be squashed like the nonsense they are.
Originally posted by Sparky63
reply to post by TheDevilOfLies
I was just using it as an example of a president who lied under oath but still had loyal followers. Clinton was the first one that came to mind. And no, I would not consider Clinton's lying about having sex with Lewinski on the same par with Obama lying about his birth certificate. It was just an example of the loyalty some people have to their candidate....even if their candidate is a fornicating liar. (which is probably true for most politicians regardless of party affiliation).
edit on 5/26/2011 by Sparky63 because: (no reason given)