Why Strauss-Kahn, Head of the IMF, had to be eliminated. He had even predicted he would be 'set-up

All of this because you feel sorry for this man who lives in $3,000 a night rooms with servants when not in one of his mansions? Like I said "Amazing". It's sad too because most rich people I've known or met are good, normal acting people.

Am I the only who senses a bit of hypocrisy in the two statements above made by the same person? If so, Amazing!

So you think the Police Dept., a Judge, the DNA evidence and everyone corroborating is a liar and you trust this elitist jerk? Amazing!

I don't trust anyone I do not personally know. Yeah, I know...Amazing!

You assume that a poor, hard working woman just trying to survive, who had the courage to take on a powerful man is a liar and fraud.

Unlike some people, I do not assume anything, nor do I jump to irresponsible conclusions without a thorough and proper investigation and fair court case. Too many innocent people have been unfairly convicted of crimes due to such moronic and judgmental thinking, which is obviously spearheaded by the disreputable mainstream media.

Originally posted by cloaked4u
I think an accident is about to happen to this person. Suicide, car accident or maybe he tries to get out of country and his plane accidently crashes. I do think that this person will not live long to tell much. I think that Maybe he might spill that the bilderberger group is a MAFIA led orginization into our banking system. This guy is definately going to get assassinated by someone. Like i said, car accident, suicide, plane crash, or maybe just missing in action. Either way, this guy will not be around much longer, you see. Just wait.

edit on 19-5-2011 by cloaked4u because: (no reason given)

lets hear what the SCUM has to say. He may have damming evidence against the bilderberger group. This ought to be interesting. I wonder how long he will live.

reply to post by Asktheanimals

It looks like the media are leading the lynching party so I would guess this might be true. They can't have anyone in that kind of position of power who might possibly want to regulate the rich and powerful. After all they went through just to be "free" they certainly aren't going to give up that power without a fight.

I'm sorry, but why would this guy be allowed to reach the rank of head of the IMF in the first place if his philosophies on these financial matters weren't in line with what TPTB want?

This looks similar to what happened with Julian Assange.

I am not saying either of these men are innocent, but my 78 year old grandma who watches soaps all day and has never touched a computer commented that this was probably a set up.

Really? How hard is it to find a blow job in NYC for a guy like him?

You had better have no weaknesses if you want to go against the ruling class.

Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to post by Asktheanimals

 

It looks like the media are leading the lynching party so I would guess this might be true. They can't have anyone in that kind of position of power who might possibly want to regulate the rich and powerful. After all they went through just to be "free" they certainly aren't going to give up that power without a fight.

I'm sorry, but why would this guy be allowed to reach the rank of head of the IMF in the first place if his philosophies on these financial matters weren't in line with what TPTB want?

good question, and it brings a thought i've always had to mind: to defeat an opponent you have to study/ maybe infiltrate them.

I can admit, i know nothing of this person or his past. but, let's say, for instance, he was one like us. as a youth he wondered how the world operated, the gears and cogs that moved things one way or another. and in the questions that we all encounter when trying to figure things out, he realized that at some point in that journey he'd have to don the skin of a wolf, to be able to blend, maybe he chose to do so.

maybe he played the role so that he could win their confidence and get them to relax their guard. it happens all the time in even our "normal lives". governments plant operatives in other governments, police have paid informants/ infiltrate criminal operations on the regular, and for normal people, co-workers sometimes befriend their co-workers who are competing for a high position to find dirt to knock them out of contention.

hell, you can even look at teen relationships if you wanna go back far enough...ever seen 2 girls competing for the same dude?? i remember personally watching 2 girls compete for a dude, they both hated each other but still sat at the same lunch table yucking it up...then told the dude dirty tidbits on each other to make him choose.

Timeline of events in Strauss-Kahn case
sg.news.yahoo.com...

SATURDAY ABOUT 12:00 P.M. EDT (1600 GMT) - A law enforcement official said that according to the maid's account, she entered Strauss-Kahn's suite, room 2806, which she apparently thought was unoccupied. Following routine procedure, she announced herself when she entered the suite, and left the front door to the suite unlocked and ajar.

Did the maid knock prior to entering the room? Why or why not? Considering how important (translation: drops big cash) this client is, you'd think that the management of such a high end hotel would inform the maid not to enter the room until she had confirmation from the front desk that he had checked out. A client in his position of power can have a manager fired on the spot for such a screw up. This isn't some nobody vacuum salesman from the midwest we're talking about.

She entered the living room and didn't see anyone. Then she opened the door to the bedroom, where she saw Strauss-Kahn, naked. She apologized and said she would come back later, and started to leave the room.

She walked through the living room and did not see any of his personal belongings? WTF? He had all of his belongings stashed in the bedroom? Aren't these maids trained to not enter the room when they still see belongings around? Again, did she knock when she entered the bedroom?

Strauss-Kahn allegedly ran after the maid and, according to the criminal complaint filed by prosecutors, shut the door of his hotel room, preventing her from leaving.

A 62 year old white guy is faster than a very fit 32 year old woman (ever try doing maid work on a daily basis for three years?) from West Africa??? She even had a head start and he caught her? Was this economist a track star back in the day?

The woman fled and reported the incident to her supervisor, who called the police. SATURDAY, about 1:30 P.M. - Security staff at the Sofitel called police to report the alleged sexual assault, a law enforcement source told Reuters.

Since this incident happened at about noon time, why did it take the supervisor and/or security staff 90 minutes to call the police? And since we're on the subject, who actually called the police, the supervisor or the security staff?

SATURDAY, about 3.30 P.M. - Strauss-Kahn called the hotel to ask about his missing mobile phone and asked that it be delivered to him at John F. Kennedy International Airport.

It took this guy over three hours to realize his cell phone was missing? One would think a person of his importance lives on the cell phone and would realize that it was missing after maybe ten minutes.

SUNDAY 2:15 A.M. - Strauss-Kahn was arrested and charged with a criminal sexual act, SUNDAY 3.50 P.M. - The maid arrived at the Special Victims Unit in a van and shielded from photographers by police with a white sheet. She identified Strauss-Kahn in a six-man lineup, an NYPD spokesman said.

This guy was arrested and charged approximately 13 hours BEFORE she picked him out of the lineup? Is that how it works? How about if she hadn't positively identified him? This gives assumption of guilt by authorities a new meaning. All I can say it...Amazing!

When he said he was compelled to step down as IMF Chief, he meant it. Whether the charge is true or not he is no longer in charge of the IMF. It will be sad if he is proven innocent and he doesn't get reinstated. More sad if it's true though.

The tweet that broke the DSK story - How did Raphael Pinet know so soon?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by SphinxMontreal


Yeah, isn't it noteworthy how so many on ATS are immediately believing the MSM's official story hook, line, and sinker just because they think everything associated with the IMF is 'evil'?

I've had some notable ATS members imply I have sympathy for a rapist because I have dares to point out several of the inconsistencies of this 'story'.

Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to post by Asktheanimals

 

It looks like the media are leading the lynching party so I would guess this might be true. They can't have anyone in that kind of position of power who might possibly want to regulate the rich and powerful. After all they went through just to be "free" they certainly aren't going to give up that power without a fight.

I'm sorry, but why would this guy be allowed to reach the rank of head of the IMF in the first place if his philosophies on these financial matters weren't in line with what TPTB want?

A great question that illustrates how people are not looking at this issue correctly. There is not just one 'agenda', and to assume that all of the "PTB" are on the same page, or fighting to go in the same direction is wrong.

In short, DSK was taking the IMF over the past ten years in a much more 'socially responsible' vein. After the 'gobal meltdown' of 08, the IMF went from being marginal organization without much importance in the developed world, to a major player in many of the economic meltdowns. Much of what DSK was trying to do was to take the currently existing mechanisms of the IMF and use them in ways that would likely benefit the people it is SUPPOSED to benefit, the average person, and not just the lenders and a few select leader from the recipient country.

His removal will mean a marked change in direction for the IMF, likely one that will have negative impacts n the stability f the Euro, which immediately benefits theUS Dollar. To assume all these powerful interests are all on the same team is a product of having only a superficial understanding of these organizations and what their overall goals are.

Originally posted by MikeboydUS
This is a US vs. EU power struggle.

Europe demands that next IMF chief comes from EU

BRUSSELS – The European Commission insisted Thursday that next leader of the International Monetary Fund must come from the 27-nation European Union, a stance backed by the Germany, the continent's economic heavyweight.

news.yahoo.com...

There are two consortiums or syndicates, one American and the other European thats going head to head here.

On one hand you have a Houston-New York Axis, lead by JP Morgan Chase and ExxonMobil, a legacy of Morgan and Rockefeller. These are the power behind the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, which was formed to compete with the Bilderberg Group.

On the other hand you have a Paris-Berlin-Rome entente, dominated by the Royal Houses of Europe and the Catholic Church. These are the people who dominate the Bilderberg Group.

If the US puts one of its own on the IMF throne or one of the Trilateral Commission members, like Japan or China. It will be a major provocation to Europe.

I don't know how this will end, but one of the objectives seems to be the collapse of the EU and the Euro, while placing Europe in hundreds of billions of dollars of debt. Things could get messy.

There seems to be some truth in this. You see, WWIII will most likely be some distant conflict between the US and the EU, with the UN and NATO somewhere in the middle...

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


Yep. You only believe that all Alleged Victims are Guilty Until Proven Innocent.

Victims are guilty and accused of crimes and moral turpitudes with abandon.

But apparently, THAT's okay and "unbiased."

Why does this thread have more flag's then the TALLEST TREE ON EARTH, OR SCIENCE MATERIAL TO TALK TO DOLPHINS...... Hey. No one cares. That's why. Enjoy your day.

reply to post by wcitizen
well probably thats why the world is ending on 5/21/11

reply to post by multiangelheart


rain rain go away come again another day. Don't do it man!

Originally posted by wcitizen

a key player who was working against the interests of the cabal and in the interests of the world population.

if he was he would never have become fmi director in first place.

better not forget :

+ it is sarkozy himself that proposed strauss-khan for fmi director at the time.

+ strauss khan is zionist

almost sure he's been set up, but why ? there's something else, something more, out of the scope of the common people that we are.

To those who think DSK is incapable of committing an (alleged) sexual assault I would like to say this...

Look through the eyes of the utra-powerful and rich...
Any person in power can hire someone to satisfy their sexual desires on a whim... Yet someone in power can eventually grow bored a this type of easily obtained (and sometimes compensated) sexual experience..

Over time, there is no more excitement in this form of common sexual arousal and eventually it becomes more about an emotional high to push the boundaries and limits of what can be done without consequences - about pushing the limits of personal power and influence.

Look at Clinton - You think he really needed to screw around with an intern? I personally think it was more about the thrill than the act.. I'm not saying this is what happened to DSK - I'm just saying that people of power think more of the emotional rush and excitement than the physical sex..

When someone is powerful and rich, consensual sex (paid or not) becomes as easy as ordering delivery pizza... This can become uninteresting to those in power and eventually result in more aggressive thrill-seeking behavior.. not saying this is what happened - yet it is something I think is commonplace among the elite...

I'm not saying this is the case with DSK - just something to consider...

Originally posted by matito
To those who think DSK is incapable of committing an (alleged) sexual assault I would like to say this...

Look through the eyes of the utra-powerful and rich...
Any person in power can hire someone to satisfy their sexual desires on a whim... Yet someone in power can eventually grow bored a this type of easily obtained (and sometimes compensated) sexual experience..

Over time, there is no more excitement in this form of common sexual arousal and eventually it becomes more about an emotional high to push the boundaries and limits of what can be done without consequences - about pushing the limits of personal power and influence.

Look at Clinton - You think he really needed to screw around with an intern? I personally think it was more about the thrill than the act.. I'm not saying this is what happened to DSK - I'm just saying that people of power think more of the emotional rush and excitement than the physical sex..

When someone is powerful and rich, consensual sex (paid or not) becomes as easy as ordering delivery pizza... This can become uninteresting to those in power and eventually result in more aggressive thrill-seeking behavior.. not saying this is what happened - yet it is something I think is commonplace among the elite...

I'm not saying this is the case with DSK - just something to consider...

I see. You aren't "saying" it. You're just saying it. You're saying he could be a psychopathic pervert, but you're not saying he is. How very subtle of you.

We don't have the information to judge or to draw any conclusions. Time will tell. Maybe.

What happened to the old elimination tactic "he had child porn on his PC"? don't the CIA use that one anymore? this sounds so much like the tactic they used on Julian Assange when he was in the midst of releasing US military 'secret' documents which exposed what was going on in Afghanistan. Stating he had raped 2 women, next minute all the charges were dropped. More than likely because he had already put in place protection for himself, in the form of more sensitive documents being released should anything happen to him. Shame this guy didn't think to do the same thing.

reply to post by dubiousone




Yes indeed dubiousone, you have me pinned - that's how I roll...
Really though, I look at all sides - I tend to not pick sides unless I see relevant evidence/proof...