Why Strauss-Kahn, Head of the IMF, had to be eliminated. He had even predicted he would be 'set-up

Originally posted by RUSSO
reply to post by wcitizen

 

I think I missed this thread, because I did one about this issue today, so mods can close him. But I want to share with you what I think about it:

...Not worth it give an opinion on the guilt or innocence about the sexual crime of Dominique Strauss Kahn is accused, the MSM already lynched him. Anyway, this criminal case seems too well orchestrated to be true, there are many inconsistencies and it is hard to believe this story.

What is important here to emphasize is: who benefits from the exit from the scene of Strauss Kahn?

Remember when in 2007 he was appointed to be the boss of the IMF, was elected by the club Bilderberg group, which is member. At that time, he posed no "danger" to the global financial and economic elites with whom shared the same ideas.

In 2008, there is the global financial crisis and with it the past few months, the voices of criticism as to the guilt of the banking world and the permissive role of cooperating and even the U.S. government. Little by little, the director of the IMF began to distance themselves from the policy pursued by their predecessors in the field that the U.S. has always had within the organization.

Earlier this month, went unnoticed in MSM the discourse of Dominique Strauss Kahn. He was now far from what has always been the orientation of the IMF. Progressively, the IMF was to abandon part of its main lines: the control of capital and job flexibility. The liberalization of finance, capital markets and was increasingly in the eyes of Strauss Kahn, responsible for the proliferation of the crisis "made in America."

The IMF boss now showing in their speeches via a "softer" financial "aid" to countries in need, allowing a lower unemployment and a sustainable consumption, and therefore would not be necessary to resort to unbridled privatization that only delayed the economic resumption. Of course, the world bankers saw no welcome this change, believed that everything and always had been, namely that the policy followed so far by the IMF had the expected results, ie the profits of large financial groups were guaranteed .

This turnaround was welcome to progressive economists like Joseph Stiglitz in a recent speech to the Brookings Institution, may have given the death sentence while praising the work of his friend Dominique Strauss Kahn. At that meeting Kahn Strauss concluded by saying: "After all, employment and justice are the foundations for stability and economic prosperity, a policy of stability and peace. This is the basis of IMF's mandate. This is the foundation of our program" .

It was unthinkable to the global financial power to accept such speech, the IMF could not become an wealth distribution organization. Dominique Strauss Kahn had become a big problem.

Recently had declared: "The job is only half done, as he has been leading the fund through a fundamental rethinking of its economic theory. In recent remarks, he has provided a broad summary of the conclusions: State regulation of markets needs to be more extensive; global policies need to create a more even distribution of income; central banks need to do more to prevent lending and asset prices from expanding too fast. 'The pendulum will swing from the market to the state"

Last week, Dominique Strauss Kahn, at George Washington University, went further in his statement: "Globalization has delivered a lot ... but it also has a dark side, a large and growing chasm between the rich and the poor. Clearly we need a new form of globalization' to prevent the 'invisible hand' of loosely regulated markets from becoming 'an invisible fist.'"

Dominique Strauss Kahn here, signed his death sentence, stepped onto the red line, so He was trapped and crushed.

RUSSO, you started a thread today? We've been discussing this case for the last six days:

"IMF Leader Arrested After Alleged Sex Attack"

www.abovetopsecret.com...&addstar=1&on=11391162#pid11391162

Reaching started this thread on May 14, six days ago.

reply to post by RUSSO


Thanks, Russo, for posting all that excellent information. I agree with you, that last speech you mention almost definitely signed his arrest warrant.

It will be interesting to see how this develops. He will have been privy to lots of information about TPTB that they would not want to be made public. And since he allegedly expected to be set up, perhaps he has some kind of 'insurance policy' somewhere.

Given all the inside knowledge he must have, I imagine his safety is a real concern right now.

Also, apologies if this thread was started after yours - I'm not sure which one appeared first. I did do a search before starting the thread but didn't find anything - but that is never conclusive.

Originally posted by Asktheanimals
It looks like the media are leading the lynching party so I would guess this might be true. They can't have anyone in that kind of position of power who might possibly want to regulate the rich and powerful. After all they went through just to be "free" they certainly aren't going to give up that power without a fight.
Sk will he tried and convicted in the court of public opinion, innocence won't matter.

Seriously, someone that powerful doesn't need to rape a hotel maid,
they have "friends" they can call 24/7 for anything ( I mean ANYTHING) they want.
They are going to throw him to the wolves.

Exactly, we've been discussing this for the last six days on this ATS thread:

IMF Leader Arrested After Alleged Sex Attack

www.abovetopsecret.com...&addstar=1&on=11391162#pid11391162

reply to post by RUSSO


Russo and wcitizen, you both did a much better job than me of examining the issue - I began the first thread when the story broke.

I think it's a shame that we have so many threads (at least four) on essentially the same topic because it dilutes discussion, but it is great that so many people are sharing ideas on this story.

I was thinking about it a lot today: it doesn't matter who is right or who is wrong, it's bad news. Either a man was framed or a woman was raped and either circumstance is terribly unfortunate.

Many people have very strong opinions about this case.

Given that people who come to this site do so to have discussions that may in some small way contribute to a better world, I think we should all remember that even if we disagree, we should be courteous to one another. Anything less just contributes more to the negativity that this incident brought into the world.

reply to post by Bordon81


He was a client of the same "business" as client #9(spitzer), so i think that yeah, if he wanted it, he didn't have to assault anyone, he could've just called in an order just like Domino's.
I smell set up.
Also, it kind of reminds me of the whole "Assange" rape set up.

Originally posted by wcitizen
reply to post by RUSSO

 

Thanks, Russo, for posting all that excellent information. I agree with you, that last speech you mention almost definitely signed his arrest warrant.

It will be interesting to see how this develops. He will have been privy to lots of information about TPTB that they would not want to be made public. And since he allegedly expected to be set up, perhaps he has some kind of 'insurance policy' somewhere.

Given all the inside knowledge he must have, I imagine his safety is a real concern right now.

Also, apologies if this thread was started after yours - I'm not sure which one appeared first. I did do a search before starting the thread but didn't find anything - but that is never conclusive.

edit on 19-5-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)

I think it was my mistake, I should searched this with another key words. Thanks to post this thread and I'm very pleasead you liked my info.

And I agree with you, an 'insurance policy' would be just great.

Originally posted by henriquefd
Nobody needs to rape anybody. Sex is easily availabe everywhere. That dude was probably framed. AND if he was paying in accord to the interest of TPTB they would be helping him by not giving too much publicity on this. But they are bringing him down to fulfill TPTB agenda. I hope Srkozy doesnt win.

sarkozy aka the Amnericans french poodle is hated in France they dont like the war and he is a known maglomaniac heck they just put out a movie about him thats none too flatering.

Originally posted by Chrysalis
DSK, the above mentioned Dominique is part of the elite...
He's been with the Bilderberg for over a decade.

My opinion, if he's been set up is :
- Ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall, there's been in Europe a battle amongst parties so as to position themselves for the following.
- That event served as the foundation for the forcing into people's minds that communism was dead, and capitalism the victor.
- Crazy times we know about with the excesses of liberalism, hedge funds, tax havens, sub-primes...
- Meanwhile, in Europe, happened the "Shift". Traditional Right parties started adopting an even more rightish stance, paving the way for the re-inforcement of the far-right brigades.
-Traditional left / socialist parties mostly shifted their stance to a more liberal / centrist approach.
-The french socialist party is actually the bad sheep in Europe. Many times, the left group of the EU parliament asked the french socialist party to let go of the more leftish ideas.
-But given the political situation in france, as the socialists start losing votes to more extreme left parties, they veered left again.
-Here comes DSK, he was the guy chosen by the elite to rule in france and force from within the socialist party a more liberal policy.

Bad luck, bad temper, bad karma... I don't really care. The dude has Bilderberg tattooed all over his face. He certainly is not some kind of savior for the poor, he's the last nail in the coffin.

Yeah, I have a hard time believing DSK is a nice guy. I think DSK was set up to be ruined, because he has gotten in the way of even more powerful people.

Originally posted by AuranVector

Originally posted by Chrysalis
DSK, the above mentioned Dominique is part of the elite...
He's been with the Bilderberg for over a decade.

My opinion, if he's been set up is :
- Ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall, there's been in Europe a battle amongst parties so as to position themselves for the following.
- That event served as the foundation for the forcing into people's minds that communism was dead, and capitalism the victor.
- Crazy times we know about with the excesses of liberalism, hedge funds, tax havens, sub-primes...
- Meanwhile, in Europe, happened the "Shift". Traditional Right parties started adopting an even more rightish stance, paving the way for the re-inforcement of the far-right brigades.
-Traditional left / socialist parties mostly shifted their stance to a more liberal / centrist approach.
-The french socialist party is actually the bad sheep in Europe. Many times, the left group of the EU parliament asked the french socialist party to let go of the more leftish ideas.
-But given the political situation in france, as the socialists start losing votes to more extreme left parties, they veered left again.
-Here comes DSK, he was the guy chosen by the elite to rule in france and force from within the socialist party a more liberal policy.

Bad luck, bad temper, bad karma... I don't really care. The dude has Bilderberg tattooed all over his face. He certainly is not some kind of savior for the poor, he's the last nail in the coffin.

Yeah, I have a hard time believing DSK is a nice guy. I think DSK was set up to be ruined, because he has gotten in the way of even more powerful people.

"Bad luck, bad temper, bad karma... I don't really care. The dude has Bilderberg tattooed all over his face. He certainly is not some kind of savior for the poor, he's the last nail in the coffin.

Yeah, I have a hard time believing DSK is a nice guy. I think DSK was set up to be ruined, because he has gotten in the way of even more powerful people."

Yup. Pretty much sums up the situation.
2nd line - are we all F'd or do we see some hope of getting out from under TBTB plans? Opinions?

Incase anyone hasn't seen...



Yea the IMF isn't a complete scam...

Originally posted by Raelsatu
Incase anyone hasn't seen...

Yea the IMF isn't a complete scam...

Along with the UN, CFR, TriLateral, etc. as well as the whole banking system we're captive to around the world.

Originally posted by wedidgothacked




There definitely is some kind of power struggle going on with TPTB, looking at all the scandals in the past, most were swept under the carpet .this however is being dragged through the media at a time of world political unrest.



globalistagenda.org...

its that sort of thinking that gets us "hoping", when thats not what we need at all. TPTB WON'T collapse because of a "Power Struggle." If this ever appears to be the situation, rest assured, it is not.

Originally posted by R3N3G4D3
Funny how it's an immigrant too "You say he did this and you can stay here or bring your whole family". Kinda covers up the Bin Laden mess for the time being too.

The "attempted rape victim's" name is Nafissatou Diallo. She's been in the US for 13 years and has a green card.

Many members of her family are already in the US.

She is from Guinea-Conakry, a former French colony in West Africa.

My quess is that she may have been blackmailed to participate in this. It may involve her family either here or in Guinea.

Originally posted by Raelsatu
Incase anyone hasn't seen...

Yea the IMF isn't a complete scam...

Thanks, Raelsatu, for posting this. Everyone should see it. I'm surprised it was even shown on US TV. Reminds me why I watch more Fox than any other TV news. (I don't have Fox Business though.)

The IMF using US Taxpayer money whenever they want to & bypassing Congress -- this is a direct violation of US sovereignty. Do most Americans know or care?

I think DSK was set up, but I still think he's IMF/Global Elite scum.

reply to post by AuranVector


Good digging. New info to me.
Also, just wanted to see if my avatar actually is showing up now.. (Off topic, i know.)
but like i said previously, smells fishy, like most things in Corperment/Goverprise(phrase stolen from G. Ure @ urnbansurvival.co...)
fill in the M, and you've got a decent daily update of world happenings without much bias, and a common sense attitude that seems to have disappeared completely in the MSM -Corperment/Goverprise media.



Yeah, George Ure is involved with Cliff & the Webbot deal.

Personally i did not believe in the possibility of a framing in this particular case until he was refused bail, this is not the norm for the rich and powerful.

Originally posted by Manouche
reply to post by Bordon81

 

I don't know Bundy, I will assume he is a famous American serial killer.

Since you seem to say he was intelligent, I feel safe to say he has never raped a woman in his hotel room. Despite his sickness and psychological state, he has always kept in mind to avoid being caught.

So if DSK is sick and has been for years, supposedly hiding it smartly, what happened that made him ruining everything for him so cheaply ?

Exactly, Manouche, this is so insane & self-destructive -- if he actually did this.

And a Black woman! That brings up the spectre of ugly history -- White Masters raping Black slaves -- talk about inflammatory crimes.

I think he was set up to be smeared as much as possible.

This is a great topic that's bigger than it really seems..

The global banking implications of all these recent events do bring one to think there is something more going on that just an alleged sexual assault.

The timing is very suspicious. DSK having the popular votes as the French presidential candidate and IMF currently in middle of financial loans of Greece and other countries. Also IMF being the huge influence on world banking and currency.

Yet, it's also possible that instead of a outright set-up, that DSKs elitist protection (if that really exists) was revoked - making him vulnerable to his own actions. I find it strange though that his arrest was so quick under the circumstances. I would expect police to have more caution in arresting such a public figure of power without going though the "proper" channels and/or investigation.

Until a new IMF director is chosen it will be hard to determine if there really was a set up IMO. If the new IMF director has completely opposite views than DSK then that tells me they didn't support his economic or banking views.

Also when IMF finally does elect a new IMF director - I imagine all the news coverage about DSK will disappear (and maybe DSK as well?).

If DSK actually makes it to trial and does time (which I seriously doubt) then I may lean toward the possibility that he actually did commit the crime and most likely lost the support and protection of the elitists.

Now that he has stepped down from IMF and potentially will lose the candidacy for the French presidency, then he may not be considered a threat any longer.

If DSK does eventually have the charges dropped, never stands trial, is acquitted or outright disappears - then I will start leaning to a potential set-up.

At this point in time I'm still assessing the situation..

I think an accident is about to happen to this person. Suicide, car accident or maybe he tries to get out of country and his plane accidently crashes. I do think that this person will not live long to tell much. I think that Maybe he might spill that the bilderberger group is a MAFIA led orginization into our banking system. This guy is definately going to get assassinated by someone. Like i said, car accident, suicide, plane crash, or maybe just missing in action. Either way, this guy will not be around much longer, you see. Just wait.

Originally posted by Echtelion
reply to post by wcitizen

 

Another attempt at defending a rapist... and obscuring the fact that at least one women in there got raped.

You cannot show the aggressor as the victim... doesn't work.

There was no rape. DSK is accused of ATTEMPTED rape.