It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ron Paul: U.S. May Try to Occupy Pakistan

page: 2
21
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 19 2011 @ 12:55 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


The US military is a Pu$$y. That is why they only fight third world countries. Why havent they attacked germany, russia, or china? Yes they are still developing countries, but still why havent any of those countries been attacked? Oh I know why...because we americans like to pick on little helpless countires and then we think we are all big and and brag to our other marine buddies at the bar about how some towel head got sniped..yea real brave...NOT




posted on May, 19 2011 @ 12:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Jocko Flocko
 


What if pakistan decidse to launch one nuke at every single US base in the middle east? How many body bags are gonna come back to the USA?

The only way the pakls would launch a nuclear attack was for defense and violation of soverignity as the USA has started with drone flights.
edit on 19-5-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 12:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


The US military is a Pu$$y. That is why they only fight third world countries. Why havent they attacked germany, russia, or china? Yes they are still developing countries, but still why havent any of those countries been attacked? Oh I know why...because we americans like to pick on little helpless countires and then we think we are all big and and brag to our other marine buddies at the bar about how some towel head got sniped..yea real brave...NOT


We occupy Germany.

Russia backed down when we sent ships into the Black Sea during their invasion of Georgia. Same goes for China when they threatened Taiwan.
No one has had the balls to stand up to us, except for megalomaniacs with delusions of grandeur in pissant countries.



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:04 AM
link   
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 


That be like saying the Russians or the Chinese are pussies when they attacked 3rd world countries. You think the U.S. is the only one? Please...



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:06 AM
link   
reply to post by MikeboydUS
 


We didnt invade russia or china



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by deltaboy
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 


That be like saying the Russians or the Chinese are pussies when they attacked 3rd world countries. You think the U.S. is the only one? Please...


the usa has how many bases across the world?



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by MikeboydUS
 


We didnt invade russia or china


Fighting is unnecessary if the opponents submit.

We presented a challenge and they backed down.
edit on 19/5/11 by MikeboydUS because: s



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:15 AM
link   
reply to post by MikeboydUS
 


We dont know the reasons. Maybe they just didnt want to fight. Just like how the NK and SK are not fighting right now



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:19 AM
link   
So you people think that the U.S cannot disable the nuclear toys of Pakistan?



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by ncb1397
Ron Pual is off his rocker on this one. No one is talking about invading and occupying Pakistan. It is a cheap tool to use some concocted scenario as a political tool. This is one of the worst cases of a strawman that I have seen.



A straw man is a component of an argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.


Libya is not Iraq is not Afghanistan is not Pakistan.






Libya is not Iraq is not Afghanistan is not Pakistan.


Everything what is happening in libya is like iraq its money,black gold cutting off china supplies



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


Then why did China buy up Iraq's oilfields? How does that cut them off?

They bought up the mines in Afghanistan too. It makes no sense.



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:26 AM
link   
If Pakistan even came to the thought of using nukes, they would be the first all glass country.



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by radkrish
So you people think that the U.S cannot disable the nuclear toys of Pakistan?


this wont be a nuke war, the us would lose too many troops.even if one or two nukes escaped..is it worth it...



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:28 AM
link   
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 


How exactly is that relevant to Russia and China being pussies for attacking 3rd world nations?



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by TheLieWeLive
 


Its not a matter of oil. There are many other things with value.

Besides if it turns out like Iraq, where China buys up the oil fields, or Afghanistan, where China bought up the mines, whats the point of resources.

If we go into Pakistan, it will be out of vengeance and anger. I imagine there are some people at the Pentagon whose blood is boiling and fuming over the ISI protecting Bin Laden.
edit on 18/5/11 by MikeboydUS because: an


LOL.. protecting a ghost.. he died in 2001



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:36 AM
link   
"The US military is a Pu$$y."

Interesting, they did a pretty good job stopping the Soviets from expanding westwards into Europe during the cold war by using it's massive overwhelming nuclear deterent, ICBM and submarnine force. The only thing that stood in the way of Soviet occupation was America's coupling with NATO forces that deployed superior tactical nuclear weapons along european borders, it was the only way Europe and the West could defned itself from the Soviets massive armoured forces which were poised along the border.

However, based on the fact that all you can offer up is child like cheap shot one liners like your latest piece of epic brilliance, I have a feeling you don't even have the slightest idea what the Warsaw Pact was do you?


Interesting how everyone forgets about the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and other smaller nations during the 60's, 70's and 80's...
edit on 19-5-2011 by Jocko Flocko because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:36 AM
link   
reply to post by deltaboy
 


the us only attacks weak nations, not stronger ones. the russians/chinese dont do it as often, and when they do its only local skirmishes. the russians/chinese dont have bases in mexico do they?



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Jocko Flocko
 


name any war which the us invaded which was not a third world country. it was the US and the allies in WW2, not just the USA by itself.

The US was involved with:
korea
vietnam
afghan
libya
iraq

just to name a few. All countries without nukes, that is the only reason they were invaded. the us has not invaded any country with nukes because we are pu$$ies. I stand by that statement.
edit on 19-5-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 01:55 AM
link   
Any nation is weak compared to the US


A war with China or Russia would be idiotic, it would end up both sides destroyed. Until very, VERY good defenses are built its going to be a long while. The missile shield in Europe is a start and with the progress of our ABM defenses.

In a perfect world, conventionally USA would sweep through.

Calling a country a pussy is just ignorant when you face the chance of nuclear weapons sent your way or a allies. Those CIA spies in Pakistan taking photos of nuclear sensitive facilities must be useful for something huh? A what-if situation.



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 02:11 AM
link   

`1991 Gulf War'

Iraq was far from being a third world country, it had massive forces and at the time, in 1991, was the 4th largest standing military power in the world. Iraq had a massive arsenal of Russian made weapons ranging from the simple AK-47 to advanced Russian made surface to air missile systems (they actually shot down a few U.S. planes, but not much considering the amount of air strikes that took place). They had highly trained tank divisions which were called the "Republican Guard" and a standing army of just over 650,000. The Iraqi army was very well seasoned as they had been engaged in a long war with Iran, coupled with thier regular use of chemical weapons against Iranian targerts and on thier own people in Iraq, from a strategic standpoint, Iraq was a force to be recognized.



Here's some reading for you so hopefully you quit trolling with immature nonsense.

en.wikipedia.org...

Your asinine logic would make Russia/USSR and China so called "pussies" as well. I won't spoil the fun in actually reading some history books about past Russian and Chinese invasions of neighbouring countries though, you will have to look them up for yourself


Mod Note : Posting work written by others.– Please Review This Link.

edit on 22-5-2011 by xpert11 because: Add external Source tags , mod note




top topics



 
21
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join