Fox News reported OBL's death DAYS EARLIER!!!

reply to post by TrowaBarton


I tried using Twitter's advance search functions to look for anything from more than a week ago, and I couldn't get it to cooperate. Not even with my account. I could only see things that happened in the last couple of days.

Here you go ubuntus page as of a minute ago.

EDIt: Sorry to Ashley i thought you were talking about this page.



Trowa

Originally posted by AshleyD
The '20 post rule' is mainly to stop spammers, trouble makers (starting nasty topics like porn images and viruses), and those who don't know the 'ATS ways' yet and starting a bunch of nonsense 1 line threads.

We make special exceptions when a topic is of value, which we believe this one was.

If you have less than 20 posts and wish to start a thread, just u2u a mod for permission.

So she asked special permission?

reply to post by burntheships

If you have time, there was a pretty lengthy discussion of exactly these things from about page um 59 to about page 74. CLPrime and Trowa and a few others did some digging. There are unanswered questions. We have a time discrepancy too...OP reports seeing in the evening US PT. Tweet shows a timestamp of 10:43 AM US PT.

Does anyone know if Megan (OP, megneverlands, @megneverlands) has a Facebook page? Perhaps her Twitter account was linked to her Facebook page and it posted as a status update. Just a thought. I was looking at my Facebook account at a status update that came via Twitter integration and it came through with the full date and time.
--
When speaking about Brendan Ryan and Ryan Theriot, TLR said, "We've got Ryan, and we'll see what happens with Brendan." Huh?
December 10, 2010 at 5:48pm via Twitter
--
If you're a St. Louis Cardinals fan, you'll get what I was talking about. It's not important, but it demonstrates that posts on Twitter that integrate with Facebook are date/timestamped. I think I may have found her Facebook page, but I don't want to be some random guy asking to be her friend. She's had enough people prying already.

Originally posted by 4hero
1. Obviously twitter cannot be tampered with,

2. and there are definitely conflicting dates from both twitterers, so something is amiss...

I'm not sure we've verified the first?

Who is the second twitterer?

Originally posted by 4hero
BBC NEWS VIDEO
www.bbc.co.uk...
Please watch this video from 35 secs until 1:40, paying close attention to the stalling/lie at 1:21.

Thank you. I've seen a couple of these over the last couple of days. Pakistan is throwing out more stories than ALL of the ATS conspiracy theorists combined. I bow to their supreme ability to spin a thousand headed hydra of stories.

reply to post by TrowaBarton


All this happened since she posted here? Do you see something fishy here or something, Trowa?

Anyone want to e-mail the Pakistani government ad see if they want to help? .................. I'm half serious

Trowa

I cant believe 77 pages in peopel are going over fine details that have already been gone over many times in this thread. It's pretty certain this is not a fake report by the twitter user.

Posted this video twice now and you guys are just going over things already said, why not look at the date info in general, exploring all evidence about dates times, by various sources.

So if you watch the BBC video (3rd and last time I'm posting it)
www.bbc.co.uk...

you will see a blatant lie @ 1:21, now if the ISI supposedly knew nothing of this, how does the high commisioner know so much about when OBL was there?! His response is supicious, and would give the twitter report some weight.

I will make a new thread if necessary but I think those weighing up the data from this thread should watch this video too!

Originally posted by ~Lucidity

Originally posted by 4hero
1. Obviously twitter cannot be tampered with,

2. and there are definitely conflicting dates from both twitterers, so something is amiss...

I'm not sure we've verified the first?

Who is the second twitterer?

twitter.com...#!/reallyvirtual

tweeted 1st of may as it was supposedly unfolding, and his twitterings made global news.

reply to post by 4hero


Please point out what fine details were going over again that have already been covered? The topic of this thread is the tweet. Does this video relate to something that will help validate that the tweet is real, show why it has a discrepancy in the timestamp, or provide corroborating evidence to the tweet? As in that this was announced in the media prior to late last Sunday night?

reply to post by 4hero


I watched the video. The guy doesn't have a hard time hearing the questions until he gets a curveball and says, "Hmm?" as in "Come again, I don't understand you." It is interesting. Also, I don't think there's much we can do at this point, so we're going over what we know/don't know. Until we can obtain a video, there's not much else to do.

Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by 4hero

 

Please point out what fine details were going over again that have already been covered? The topic of this thread is the tweet. Does this video relate to something that will help validate that the tweet is real, show why it has a discrepancy in the timestamp, or provide corroborating evidence to the tweet? As in that this was announced in the media prior to late last Sunday night?

Just watch the video dude and use your intelligence. BTW, Most of what you have just talked about has already been mentioned, I've read every page in this thread!

reply to post by 4hero


4hero thank you for that info however that is not exactly what we are covering at this point in time. I feel that this video may very well be important but it is a piece which we can not fit into the puzzle just yet.

Respectfully

Trowa

Originally posted by 4hero

Originally posted by ~Lucidity

Originally posted by 4hero
1. Obviously twitter cannot be tampered with,

2. and there are definitely conflicting dates from both twitterers, so something is amiss...

I'm not sure we've verified the first?

Who is the second twitterer?

twitter.com...#!/reallyvirtual

tweeted 1st of may as it was supposedly unfolding, and his twitterings made global news.

This is the famous tweeter that's been covered everywhere, no? Not the topic of this thread.

Also, please identify where it was determined that obviously Twitter cannot be tampered with.

Originally posted by 4hero

Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by 4hero

 

Please point out what fine details were going over again that have already been covered? The topic of this thread is the tweet. Does this video relate to something that will help validate that the tweet is real, show why it has a discrepancy in the timestamp, or provide corroborating evidence to the tweet? As in that this was announced in the media prior to late last Sunday night?

Just watch the video dude and use your intelligence. BTW, Most of what you have just talked about has already been mentioned, I've read every page in this thread!

You are entirely off topic and cannot back up your assertions.

Please stay one topic or create a thread of your own.

And I'm not a dude.

Originally posted by Fury1984
reply to post by 4hero

 

I watched the video. The guy doesn't have a hard time hearing the questions until he gets a curveball and says, "Hmm?" as in "Come again, I don't understand you." It is interesting. Also, I don't think there's much we can do at this point, so we're going over what we know/don't know. Until we can obtain a video, there's not much else to do.

The reporter exposed this guy as a liar because no one from Pakistan government knew of the supposed raid, he initially struggled to answer the question, then gave aa weak reply, and licked his lips (sign of lying).

So that says to me that they are lying about dates etc, and so the OP's tweet has also highlighted a lie, 2 lies prove that this is all one big lie!

Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by burntheships

 

Her tweet about the ticker fits in, sequentially, with the rest of her posts from that day. This is the main reason I believe her account could not have been hacked to back-date the tweet... to both redate and reorder the tweet with a legitimate tag

Agreed.

Originally posted by ~Lucidity

edit on 5/9/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)

1: It would be impossible for the OP to hack timestamps on twitters' server

2: The first twitterer has provided a link to the tweet from the 28th april, that is enough verification! Second twiiterer was someone who lived near the compund and supposedly accidentally tweeted something was going on before the news broke, but tweeted on the 1st may, hours before the official news broke.

3: I cannot be bothered to go back to the exact page to give you the info that states it cannot be tampered with, jeez, 77 pages in and you haven't read all the info, come back and comment when you have read it all! Do your own research!

4: As for fine details, again, 77 pages of many fine details! I suggest you read it all before commenting, then you'll know what you are repeating!

5: there is no discrepancy in the time stamp, the timestamp does not lie, the discrepancy is all in your head.

6: I'm off topic and cannot back up my assertions, hahaha, my info was relevant and the info is there for you to decipher, use your brain. You have not added anything positive to this post, I would say it is you who is not on topic, and are not here for any other reason except disinfo.

7: I will not change my views on your say so. I will not make threads on your say so either!

8: A dude can be male or female where I come from, so to me you are a dude, it is not sex related in England! Freedom of speech and all that.

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by TrowaBarton

 

My understanding of that is this: It was tweeted on April 28th, and then retweeted that many times.
That original tweet will not show the dates of all of the retweets.

I don't think it was many times until it went viral after this thread? Aeons and Trowa may have been working on this somewhere between pages 54 and 70 but I wasn't paying attention cuz I didn't understand it? Maybe they can summarize the retweets for us?

Originally posted by Epiphron
reply to post by StarLightStarBright2

 

There was also this, guys.

On her twitter, she posted this on May 2nd:

Yep. RT @dantaylorjr Both @jeremyscahill & @megneverlands reported on 4/28 Fox News had a ticker reporting OBL was dead. #binladen

She's saying that this person "jeremyscahill" also saw the ticker and reported it on twitter, but I checked his twitter several times and didn't see it. So either she saw it wrong, made it up, or that guy deleted the tweet (is that possible?).