It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wonderworld
I would have loved to have been on ATS in 2005 when the UK lost their constitution.
Actually, I am not basing my opinion that he has popular support SOLELY on the images I see. But lets start there. In all the images of the rebels we see a few hundred. Even when, all the western media has been trying their hardest to make this uprising look like a large one.
ca.reuters.com...
TRIPOLI (Reuters) - Deadly clashes broke out in several towns in Libya on Thursday after the opposition called for protests against leader Muammar Gaddafi in a rare show of defiance inspired by uprisings in other Arab states. Tight controls on media and communications in Libya made it difficult to assess the extent of the violence there. Unrest has spread across North Africa and the Middle East since the fall of the leaders of Tunisia and Egypt.
Journalists from newspapers and broadcasters across the world, including ITV News and the New York Times, are descending on the Libyan border as anti-government protests intensify against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.
A blanket ban on foreign journalists entering Libya has meant that facts are increasingly hard to verify.
The BBC is one of the only international news organisations with a correspondent in Libya's capital, Tripoli, where government and state television buildings came under attack on Monday.
Many western news organisations – including the Associated Press, the Daily Telegraph, and the Guardian – have been restricted to reporting from neighbouring countries, usually Egypt.
Despite threats by the embattled Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, journalists are finding ways to report and broadcast from parts of Libya, one of the least hospitable places in the world for news organizations.
Where is the missing footage of these vast numbers of rebels?
Secondly, a leader unpopular with his people faced with a majority uprising backed by the Western military might is able to hold out for a very long time. His military is not turning against him to save themselves and their families even though they can be sure they would turn the tide of victory in favor of the rebels and possibly even earn themselves favor with the new regime.
Why is this?
Thirdly, there are objective UN numbers showing the quality of life of the Libyan people to be much better than the other people in the region. This does not tend to make people unhappy with their leaders. On average, they even had better quality of life than most westerners.
Why are they so angry with him? Does this make sense?
Fourth, the story and the rationale of the "allies" seems to be morphing and shifting and their actions, (bombing Gaddafis son's house) do not correspond with their words.
Fifth, I have seen this all before, in Iraq. I have familiarity with the way our media and government propagandized "humanitarian war."
Did you watch the video a couple pages back? You tell me.
How many Americans can you count speaking out against Obama? Does this mean NATO should authorize action against him?
Many of us have pointed out the small matter of missing planes while they are shooting up in the air. Al Jazeera' has tacked on disclaimers to at least one video made about atrocities against the rebels.
What evidence do you have that they are authentic?
Were they in Libya still? Or had they emigrated from Libya?
We may find out. You can be jailed in America for life without trial. In that same "brutal intolerant country," a woman got on television, accused Gaddafis people of raping her, screamed loudly about how abusive the government has been to her, and helped instigate war against Libya, and yet she walks free, unharmed. At least up til a few days ago. That doesnt strike YOU as odd?
I have NEVER said I would participate in armed revolt against my nation. Ever. Nor would I. I would defend my nation, I would fight to protect my government from being overturned, but I would never use force of arms to overturn my own government. And yes, any group who does try to overturn the US government from within, gets what they deserve.
I have answered YOUR questions.
Answer me one. Why, in light of the actions of your government in the past, are you so willing to believe this is true? And leave out the testimony of your Libyan friends IF they are immigrants to America. Because there is bias in considering the opinion of someone who disliked it somewhere enough to leave. Americans who leave America might have some nasty things to say too. Hell, Americans IN America have some very nasty things to say about brutality by police, harassment, etc..
I probably will not engage in a long debate with you. Because I like you. And I do not want to undo our good regard for one another. We will have to just agree to disagree, but I would like to understand your position first.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
Not even if it was clear that your government was no longer the government you new and loved? If it was abusing it’s power and it’s people? That’s what this is about you know – I’m not talking about America land of the free, home of the brave...I’m talking about something else. We can only imagine that right now – but other people are living it. And not just in Libya – all over. ............
I may not know you well, but I know this about you based on everything you’ve said: If it came down to it – and something threatened to destroy this government you love so much – and replace it with something vile – you would be on the front line. As would I.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
But you and I will probably never have to make that choice – to fight or not to fight. Lucky us.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
But my information didn’t come from wikileaks or youtube – it came from damaged people. Up close and personal.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
:-) Probably not? LOL! Well, too late for that I think. Our opinions are not always the same, true. But what would be the fun in that?
Originally posted by SpiramirabilisThe only reason I opened my mouth is because I admire and respect you. I wanted to understand your thinking.
And while I am not saying this is the case with you, in this situation, I know that sensitive and emotional people can at times find it hard to be truly objective about people they know and care for.
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by stumason
I have no problem with regime change, just being lied to. I personally think we should invade other countries too and overthorw more of these nutjobs. The more democracies around the world the better as no true democracy has ever gone to war with another.
The word knob springs to mind....
Vicky
Originally posted by Aeons
They got the most dangerous son amoungst the lot.
Originally posted by alphabetaone
reply to post by Aeons
I'm sure.
I just doubt highly that it was a NATO exclusive. I'm more apt to believe his brother had a huge hand in ensuring it.
I have a real funny feeling that Mutasim-Billah Gadhafi probably used this "opportunity", or orchestrated the event with NATO.
Gadhafi's fourth son, was a lieutenant colonel in the Libyan Army and later served as Libya's national security adviser. He also has spent time living in luxury in the West, including at his mansion in the London suburbs, and hobnobbing with the rich and powerful, according to published accounts. Like other members of the family, he also is an accomplished shakedown artist, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable published by WikiLeaks.
A July 2008 report from the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli quoted a confidential informant as saying that Mutasim put pressure on the chairman of the National Oil Corp., Shukri Ghanem, to pay him $1.2 billion in cash and oil shipments. Ghanem told the confidant he was considering resigning because he feared Mutasim could seek revenge if he wasn't paid, it said. Mutasim also made headlines after WikiLeaks published the classified U.S. diplomatic cables when it was revealed that he paid pop stars Beyonce, Usher and other musicians $1 million to play at a New Year's Eve party in 2010 on the Caribbean island of St. Barts. Guests reportedly included Lindsay Lohan, music mogul Russell Simmons, the band Bon Jovi and Beyonce's husband, multimillionaire rapper Jay-Z. He is reportedly one of two Gadhafi sons -- the other being Khamis -- opposed to a peace plan being promoted by brothers Saif al-Islam and Saadi.
Source of above
edit on 1-5-2011 by alphabetaone because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aeons
The idea that they are using targeted strikes to take out all the other possible contenders to the Islamic Pan-State "Throne" and leaving Saif al-Islam alive to walk into it might keep me awake at night for a while.
When I thought they'd gotten him I had an ounce of belief that this operation was really hamstringing the caliphate.
Now, I think they are orchestrating it.
Originally posted by Aeons
So, in Iran, 11 Ordibehesht is being associated to the political/religious groups calling for the end of Khameni.
11 Ordibehesht is May 1.