It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
reply to post by Tygart
I don't think anyone is trying to hide the truth. You may be limited on ATS members that live in your specific city, so people who don't live there can only speculate.
Why don't you take some pictures of the chemtrails? That's what I did. Check it out:
OP...i just posted a thread about this a few minutes ago. i live in atlanta and they have been chemtrailing like crazy here! anytime we see any sunlight...the planes come shortly after that. haven't seen sun in days. other on this thread have noticed similar things, in different states.
I chose the University of Kansas to study meteorology… During my sophomore year at KU I auditioned for one of three openings at KTKA in Topeka… 13 months later (emphasis mine) I had gone from a 2-hour/5 day a week job to the main guy.
Originally posted by stardust1955
Well, we haven't been able to see if there are any or not here in NW Oregon, but yesterday, we had clear skies and no chemtrails, but....today a front is coming in and they have been spraying. Glad you asked. And if nobody has seen this site, it is a good one. All kinds of info. Here is the link.
Earth's climate is thought to be quite sensitive to changes in radiative fluxes that are quite small in absolute magnitude, a few watts per square meter, and in relation to these fluxes in the natural climate. Atmospheric aerosol particles exert influence on climate directly, by scattering and absorbing radiation, and indirectly by modifying the microphysical properties of clouds and in turn their radiative effects and hydrology. The forcing of climate change by these indirect effects is thought to be quite substantial relative to forcing by incremental concentrations of greenhouse gases, but highly uncertain. Quantification of aerosol indirect forcing by satellite- or ground-based remote sensing has proved quite difficult in view of inherent large variation in the pertinent observables such as cloud optical depth, which is controlled mainly by liquid water path and only secondarily by aerosols. Limited work has shown instances of large magnitude of aerosol indirect forcing, with local instantaneous forcing upwards of 50 W m[sup 66]-2. Ultimately it will be necessary to represent aerosol indirect effects in climate models to accurately identify the anthropogenic forcing at present and over secular time and to assess the influence of this forcing in the context of other forcings of climate change. While the elements of aerosol processes that must be represented in models describing the evolution and properties of aerosol particles that serve as cloud condensation particles are known, many important components of these processes remain to be understood and to be represented in models, and the models evaluated against observation, before such model-based representations can confidently be used to represent aerosol indirect effects in climate models.
You have not shown a thing, Bonez you are acting like a clown here. I wonder about people such as yourself who claim 9/11 is an inside job when you have NO repeatable, scientific evidence and yet you want it here.. Where do you think people are going to get the evidence from ??? That is like asking for access to the debris pile so you can test if from the WTC, come on man, get a life.
reply to post by _BoneZ_
There's no such thing as chemtrails and they've been debunked ad nausium here on ATS and have been proven to be disinformation. If any of you think that there is any reality to them, then try to debunk my post here: www.abovetopsecret.com... Nobody has been able to yet.