Area 51/Groom Lake Research Project, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 23-7-2004 @ 07:39 AM by ghost
Here's more proof that the TR-3 exists and is being used:

Northrop even went as far as patenting this design as D365-545
Known and Roumored Black Projects

Frist of all that proves the design IS REAL; you can Not patent something that doesn't exist! If the design wasn't being used why would they patent it? The fact that this is the same design that was mentioned in my previous post on the TR-3, tells us there is more to it then just an idea. We know and can prove that the NSA uses secret spy planes. I'm guessing the patent was supposed to be secret, but someone screwed up. This ties in with my earlier find about the TR-3. We've got one, let's go find some more.

Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance


reply posted on 23-7-2004 @ 01:10 PM by FredT
Originally posted by ghost
I think I found where most (if not all) of the mystery planes out at Groom Lake are coming from, Calafornia! I was looking through the ATS website, and I found info on a place called, Antelope Valley.


Heh Heh dated a girl from antelope valley many many years ago. As mentioned in the ATS link there are numerous Test and Radar Cross Section facilities there. Also, don't forget Palmdale and Helendale and Lancaster are all in Antelope Valley.

The RCS test areas are most noteable. Planes that are created have to be tested for RCS. These tests would have to take place at these facilities. Note that all the major Black project companies have a test range.

Tejon RCS Facility - Northrop Grumman
The facility is located at the northwest end of the Antelope Valley, on the slopes of the Tehachapi Mountains, at the mouth of Little Oak Canyon. It is 18 miles due west of the town of Rosamond.
A published account in 1985 stated that the range has the ability to test at frequencies from 2 GHz to 18 GHz

Gray Butte RCS Facility - McDonnell Douglas
McDonnell Douglas's Gray Butte RCS facility is located approximately 25 miles due east of Palmdale, on the Los Angeles-San Bernardino county line. It is at the site of an old World War II auxiliary airfield and has utilized the old runways as its ranges. The site address is 25500 East Avenue R-8, Palmdale. Literature put out by McDonnell Douglas describes three different independent ground plane ranges, varying in length from 1260' to 3750'. They can test over a continuous frequency range of 145 MHz to 18 GHz, and also spot frequencies of 24 and 35 GHz.

Junction Ranch RCS Range at China Lake
It is located in an isolated valley on the west side of the Argus Mountain range, about 2 miles southwest of Maturango Peak in the far northeastern portion of the China Lake Naval Weapons Center. Junction Ranch can perform extremely rapid measurements in UHF, L, S, C, X, Ku and Ka frequency bands. The facility also has the capability for bistatic RCS measurement. Because of the very low levels of RF interference at the location, HF capability (40-60 MHz) has recently been added.

Helendale Avionics Facility - Lockheed Martin
This facility is located on approximately 9 square miles (over 5,700 acres) of land, about 5 miles north of Helendale and just west of the Mojave River. It has a site address of 17452 Wheeler Road, Helendale CA 92342
The facility has the capability to test the complete frequency range from 120 MHz to 18 GHz, and a spot frequency of 35 GHz with four different signal polarizations This is the facility alot of UFO types claim has huge underground capacities due to the pylon that can raise up from the ground.

Just a little FYI The Skunk Works are in Palmdale at Plant 42
Edwards AFB test center is also there
Lockheed and Edwards are the biggest employers in the area.

Also is the Blackbird park. Its the only place you can see an A-12 and SR-71 Side by side
[edit on 23-7-2004 by FredT]

[edit on 24-7-2004 by FredT]

[edit on 24-7-2004 by FredT]


posted on 23-7-2004 at 08:47 Post Number: 682901 (post id: 703595)
quote: Originally posted by ghost
Here's more proof that the TR-3 exists and is being used:
We know and can prove that the NSA uses secret spy planes. I'm guessing the patent was supposed to be secret, but someone screwed up. This ties in with my earlier find about the TR-3. We've got one, let's go find some more.

Tim, a couple of areas to look into: Drones . DarkStar (Tier III-) would also be a good ELINT platform. There also was a Tier III+, but I havent found tons on it. AWST after GWII printed an article about the AF using a new secret drone over Iraq. In one of my Reference books "Lockheed Stealth" by Bill Sweetman, it has a drawing of a ultra long range stealth Drone called DistantStar. It makes sence that NSA would and could use these platforms to gather signals etc. The NSA's budget is pretty black and could hide a program or two in it. From the info Ive looked at the TR3-a leans towards a recce/targeting role which could jive in the direction you are headed.

In a far as patents are concerned, they are always avalible to the public. If you know were to work. Like the Nuclear powered tunnel boring machine that has a pattent. Secret no doubt, but you can't hide it in the patent office...

posted on 23-7-2004 at 08:57 Post Number: 682920 (post id: 703614)
More Area 51 Minutia

Tracked down the term Watertown Strip: Turns out that Allen Dulles's home town in New york was "watertown" Coincidence? I think Not!

A lead mine was also in the mountains near groom lake that belonged to the Sheahan familiy. They would be evacuated when tests went off. Some were so close that cattle and wild horses would be found dead later with beta burns. His wife would evetually die of cancer. I am trying to see if the mines still have claims on them from the state of nevada. You never know what you might be able to buy.

People at the Ranch wore dosimeters to gague radiation exposure. In 1955 alone there were no less than 14 nuclear detonation at the NTS Area 51 had to be evacuated for each test. One test (an airburst) cause radiation levels to be measure as high as 80-90 Mrems. .02-.04 is normal. Yikes.

Intersting to note, I uncovered Operation Plumbob (1957), which was designed to test if an accident might cause a bomb to go critical. It spread plutonium over a 900 acres site called Area 13. It was not cleaned up untill 1981. Kind of like a dirty bomb eh?

posted on 23-7-2004 at 20:35 Post Number: 684069 (post id: 704763)
TR-3A and NSA at Groom lake
Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by ghost
Northrop even went as far as patenting this design as D365-545
Known and Roumored Black Projects


Im wondering if Northrop was involved. Lockheed was also competed in the Stealth Bomber comp. Ben Rich in his book "Skunk Works" describes the Lockheed entry as a smaller all wing version than the Northrop design. It has a lower payload but was much more stealthy that the Northrop design. Most description of the Black Manta describe this type of triangular all wing design. It seems plausable that if the NSA was using the TR3-A for elint, sigint etc. They would not be able to hide the massive budget dent that a from scratch design would cost. Whereas if the Skunk Works had already been payed to make a prototype, it could easily be adapted and production costs hidden into the budget.

The question is why would the NSA need a plane for this when in the past they have turfed this operation to the AF and Navy.

If the NSA is involved with Groom lake, it would have to be for aircraft/drone work only. All the sattelite shots I have seen of teh base do not show any of the antenna farms that you would expect .

posted on 24-7-2004 at 18:56 Post Number: 685699 (post id: 706393)
CIA and Air Force

Doing a little digging trying to pin down the NSA involvment at Groom, but I managed to dig up this recently declassified memo. The AF was never happy about the CIA running its own air force. Apparently they tried to get the entire OXCART program trans. to them. (A-12, D-21 etc. It makes for interesting reading and shows things may not have always been chummy at the Ranch... Also, the justification of future black systems that would no doubt be tested at Groom

www.gwu.edu...

The ongoing debates between the CIA and AF. the 2nd like ir really interesting as the CIA explains why the A-12 is surperior to the SR-71 and gets into figures for altitude and speed etc.

www.gwu.edu...
www.gwu.edu...

Lastly, this 1986 memo that is heavly blanked out asseses the threats that current and future "airbreathing" Recce platforms face from the Soviets. It does not mention a replacement, but this may be a justification for the development of the Aurora etc.

www.gwu.edu...

posted on 24-7-2004 at 20:25 Post Number: 685801 (post id: 706495)
The CIA memo that started Aquatone and Ult. Area 51

This is the actual CIA memo that recomends the production of the CIA's U2 and ultimetly lead to the founding of Area 51 for testing. Not sure it helps but is intersting nonetheless.

www.gwu.edu...

posted on 24-7-2004 at 22:20 Post Number: 685862 (post id: 706556)
Followup on Drones At Area 51

I found some evidence that the CIA uses other areas in the Antelope Valley for some drone testing. Note: none of these are "black"

quote:
Another interesting place is the CIA's El Mirage Flight Test Facility, used for testing their Gnat-750 and Predator UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, i.e., reconnaissance drones.) These UAVs resemble large model airplanes. The El Mirage facility is operated by the manufacturer of the UAVs, General Atomics Corp. It has a 3700 foot (1138 meters) long runway in DMA aeronautical chart JOG NI 11-5. To get there, exit Highway 14 at Avenue P in Palmdale, and go east. You will go past Air Force Plant 42 (Lockheed's Skunk Works occupies the big hangar at the western part of Plant 42) and the Blackbird (SR-71) Museum

posted on 24-7-2004 at 22:50 Post Number: 685874 (post id: 706568)
THE EPA and Groom lake and the former employee lawsuits

quote:
Federal agencies are also subject to the requirements of federal pollution control laws. such as the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has a mandate to oversee the enforcement of the environmental laws at federal facilities, including those that conduct highly classified research operations.

In this regard, an ongoing lawsuit by former employees at an Air Force facility near Groom Lake, Nevada, alleged violations of RCRA, including EPA's failure to conduct a RCR inspection there. EPA has affirmed that EPA field inspectors conducted an inspection of the location pursuant to RCRA from December 1994 to March 1995. In August 1995, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada ruled that the plaintiffs' objectives in bringing the suit had been accomplished, in that EPA had performed its duties under RCRA to inspect and inventory the site. (3)

In May 1995, EPA and the Air Force affirmed by a memorandum of agreement that EPA w ill continue to have access at the Groom Lake facility for purposes of administering the environmental laws and that the Air Force is committed to complying with RCRA at the location. The details of the issues resulting in the agreement are classified. According to the director of EPA's Office of Federal Facilities Enforcement, EPA is fulfilling its oversight responsibility at the facility. However, he said he was uncertain of the extent to which other such highly classified federal facilities-- or areas within facilities-- may exist and whether their research operations are in environmental compliance.
- In September 1995, President Clinton exempted the Air Force's classified facility near Groom Lake, Nevada from the public disclosure provisions of RCRA, determining that the exemption was in the paramount interest of the United States.

[edit on 13-8-2004 by ADVISOR]



reply posted on 26-7-2004 @ 10:37 AM by ghost
Originally posted by FredT

Im wondering if Northrop was involved. Lockheed was also competed in the Stealth Bomber comp. Ben Rich in his book "Skunk Works" describes the Lockheed entry as a smaller all wing version than the Northrop design. It has a lower payload but was much more stealthy that the Northrop design. Most description of the Black Manta describe this type of triangular all wing design. It seems plausable that if the NSA was using the TR3-A for elint, sigint etc. They would not be able to hide the massive budget dent that a from scratch design would cost. Whereas if the Skunk Works had already been payed to make a prototype, it could easily be adapted and production costs hidden into the budget.

The question is why would the NSA need a plane for this when in the past they have turfed this operation to the AF and Navy.

If the NSA is involved with Groom lake, it would have to be for aircraft/drone work only. All the sattelite shots I have seen of teh base do not show any of the antenna farms that you would expect .
[edit on 25-7-2004 by FredT]


First of all, USAF and DoD records we found on the B-2 Research project contradict Ben Rich's clames about his ATB design being stealthier. Second, the Flying Wing is known to be a tricky design to work with(the B-2 is based on Research that Northrop has been doing continiously since the late 1920's). The Buget dent was hidden by splitting the costs with the USAF, so they only payed for 1/2 of it.

READ THE NEXT SECTION CAREFULLY, IT WILL ANSWER ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW THE PLANE IS OPERATED!

Now as for your question about why the NSA would Need a plane for this when they always use the USAF and the Navy for this in the past. The NSA works very differently then the CIA. The National Security Agency has a sub-orgnization called the Central Security Service(CSS). The CSS is made up military personell that also work in the armed forces. The Four units of the CSS are: Air Force Security Service, Army Security Agency, Naval Security Group, and Marine Security Detatchment. Through the CSS the NSA shares its buget, it's assets and its techincal experties with the four branches of the military. NOW HERE'S THE TRICK THAT MAKES IT WORK: In exchange for shairing it's buget and Technical Experties, The NSA get's priority tasking and partial mission control rights. This means the that while the Air Force owns the plane on the records, The NSA gets a say in it's use and first dips at any intelligences it collects. The Air Force owns and operates the plane, But any Intelligence that it collects is sent straight the NSA Headquaters in real-time via. SATCOM link. The NSA then shares it with the USAF as soon as the data is processed. This is also how the RC-135V/W Rivet Joint and RC-135S Cobra Ball spyplanes are used. This means the only facilities they need for the TR-3 out at Groom Lake are hangers, maintainence and fule, runways and crew support (All of which the base has had since it was built). Since nothing is processed at Groom Lake, they don't need huge antannas or satallite dishes. You're right, it is technically an Air Force aircraft, but The NSA has a major say in when, where and how the TR-3 is used.

For More info on how the NSA works and how they use Spy Planes flown by the US Air Force, Read the fallowing books by James Bamford(I got most of my info on the NSA from these two books):

The Puzzle Palace
www.amazon.com...=1090854976/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/104-9617736-9720713?v=glance&s=books" target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">The Puzzle Palace

Body of Secrets
Body of Secrets

I'm willing to admit if I'm Wrong, but I honestly don't think I am this time. Let's look into it some more and see! I know the Aurora is a Lockheed Skunkworks project, but I seriously doubt that the Black Manta is. Also, we know that Northrop is working on several Black Projects.

Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance



[edit on 26-7-2004 by ghost]


reply posted on 27-7-2004 @ 10:03 AM by ghost
Originally posted by FredT
Doing a little digging trying to pin down the NSA involvment at Groom, but I managed to dig up this recently declassified memo. The AF was never happy about the CIA running its own air force. Apparently they tried to get the entire OXCART program trans. to them. (A-12, D-21 etc. It makes for interesting reading and shows things may not have always been chummy at the Ranch... Also, the justification of future black systems that would no doubt be tested at Groom

www.gwu.edu...

The ongoing debates between the CIA and AF. the 2nd like ir really interesting as the CIA explains why the A-12 is surperior to the SR-71 and gets into figures for altitude and speed etc.

www.gwu.edu...
www.gwu.edu...

Lastly, this 1986 memo that is heavly blanked out asseses the threats that current and future "airbreathing" Recce platforms face from the Soviets. It does not mention a replacement, but this may be a justification for the development of the Aurora etc.

www.gwu.edu...


[edit on 25-7-2004 by FredT]

[edit on 25-7-2004 by FredT]

[edit on 25-7-2004 by FredT]


Based on these documents, I'd say the CIA has been at odds with the on airborn reconnaissance, almost since the beginning. That leads me to a question. After so many years of fighting for the mission, what would have prompted the CIA to give it up, Or did they really stop flying their own spy planes? Finding the answer to these questions might give us a look at the Real secrets of how dreamland works!

Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance



reply posted on 27-7-2004 @ 11:45 AM by FredT
Originally posted by ghost
I've reviewed over the last few posts. We know that drones are the big direction right now for tactical aircraft and Reconn.


Tim,

That would be great direction to turn. I have a few tenuous links to the NSA posted above regarding drones. But Groom is a perfect place to test these articles. We actually have a pretty good working list of UAV/UCAVs going right now. I have tried to find out more information on the "Distant Star" I found in the Locheed book, but have not had success yet.

The other area we have peeked at are directed energy weapons. This weeks AWST has an article about the US getting ready to put microwave weapons on the (In order of deployment) the CALCM, Tommahawk, and the JASSM. the MALD is a future canidate (2012). I recently discovered (It was new to me at any rate) that there is an electronic warfare range at Nellis. Groom would be a great place to keep these birds.

THe CIA / Air Force Memo's: From books etc, we know that SAC and the AF were not happy with the CIA having its own planes. BUT, this kind of disinformation would be perfect for and much in charecter for the CIA. I doubt that they would completely give up a mission of this type.

The only other player and this is purly conjecture on my part at Groom: What about NASA? They have done some classified things. The Venturestar, which was a Skunk Works / NASA project could have been the public persona of a very black project? That huge hanger that was recently built on the base perplexes me and I would give alot to take a peek inside


reply posted on 28-7-2004 @ 12:35 AM by FredT
Tim, et al

Take a look at the great map of Groom in this thread
www.abovetopsecret.com...

One item I have not picked up on before is the leech ponds in the lower left corner by what looks like a cement plant. Why would they need a leech pond? You see them in working mines like copper gold etc when they dunp the tailings and solutions used to process things. Wonder what they are doing with em?



reply posted on 28-7-2004 @ 12:40 AM by FredT
In talking about Space and Groom lake I have not found any direct links as of yet, but the www.spacecom.mil... site based at Offut AFB is another link in the Space Command system. They did not allow me acces to thier site but using the cached feature I came up with this:

Airborne Command Post
Ballistic Missile Submarines
Bombers (B-2) (B-52)
Command Emblem
Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
Joint Information Operations Center
Manned Space Flight Support
Military Space Forces
National Airborne Operations Center
Space Control
Space Missions
RC-135 Reconnaissance Aircraft
Theater Ballistic Missile Warning

We talked about NSA ops and the RC-135 is listed as one of thier assests. Still trying to get that direct link though.. Time to keep digging

The ARMY has a pretty big space command too. Alot of thier laser testing is at White Sands. They have pretty cool PDF brocures about thier various programs
www.smdc.army.mil...




[edit on 28-7-2004 by FredT]


reply posted on 28-7-2004 @ 07:41 AM by ghost
Originally posted by FredT
Its not at Groom lake, but.... The 30th Space Wing is based at Vandenberg. However, thier mission is a varied one. Is it possible that this is the "Public face" with descrete operations occuring eleswere. Also, Vandenberg has alot of contractors working there at any given time given the variety of programs they run. It seems resonable that they would turn sensative stuff to Groom. It also may help to link Groom to SDI research aas well.

FROM THE 30th's WEB SITE
We are here to support your Spacelift, Ballistic, Aeronautical and Test & Evaluation programs
from start to finish.. We are dedicated to applying 30 SW resources to meet your requirements.


They also evealute and test project for comapanies and other services.

The unit is comprised of the following groups:
30th Operations Support Squadron
30th Space Communications Squadron
2d Range Operations Squadron
30th Range Management Squadron
30th Weather Squadron
76th Helicopter Flight
30th Mission Support Squadron
30th Civil Engineer Squadron
30th Security Forces Squadron
30th Contracting Squadron
30th Logistics Readiness Squadron
30th Services Squadron
2d Space Launch Squadron
4th Space Launch Squadron
1st Air & Space Test Squadron

The last one is intersting. It also was one of two subgroups on the 30th's page that did not have a link for more information.

www.vandenberg.af.mil...
[edit on 27-7-2004 by FredT]


I doubt that they would have such a large wing at Groom Lake. I was thinking more like a detachment. Let's see in the wing records have any units called Det #. I'll look into it.

Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance


reply posted on 28-7-2004 @ 10:50 AM by FredT
We talked about the military planes being controlled by the NSA.. Here is the COnfirmation of that.:

www.gwu.edu...

Item #3 of the Directors responsabilities include: Inthe case of mobile military SIGINT platforms, he shall state movement requirements through appropriate channels to the military commanders who shall retain responsability for oeprational command of the vehicles.


posted on 28-7-2004 at 07:03 Post Number: 692621 (post id: 713315)
More U-2 Infor and AF participation

Below is a link to a declassified agreement (dated august 1955) between the CIA and the AF to provide support and pilots for the U2 Project. The AF called it Project OILSTONE

www.gwu.edu...


posted on 28-7-2004 at 07:44 Post Number: 692728 (post id: 713422)
More NSA Stuff

This document essential IMHO kicks the CIA out of the SIGINT business and installs the NSA. The NSA in turn has to be responsive CIA requests for info. Dated in 1976. It is reasonable to assume that the CIA would have to turn over any air based sigint assests it owned at the time. Perhaps this is the entry point of the NSA to area 51??

www.gwu.edu...

posted on 28-7-2004 at 19:35 Post Number: 694011 (post id: 714705)
Were Groom got its name.

Okay, more minutia for us to chew on. Finally tracked down how Groom came about the name "Groom". This corresponds to the USGS Quad maps that are all labled Groom Mine etc.
quote:
The Groom Mining District is located in Lincoln County, Nevada, about 50 miles north of Indian Springs and 100 miles southwest of Pioche. The Conception Mines were the first worked in that area, in about 1871. The name "Groom" appeared in the early 1870s as a result of an English financing of the Conception Mines by the "Groome Lead Mines Limited." The area contained mostly low grade ores of silver and lead - no gold. Other claims in the vicinity of the Conception included the Willow, Maria, and White Lake (sometimes referred to in these records as Whitelake).

J.B. Osborne and his partners acquired the claims at Groom and patented them in 1876. Osborne's son, T.J., acquired these interests in the 1890s. In June, 1916 these claims were incorporated as the Groom Nevada Lead Mines Company and as the Groom Southend Mining Company. As records in this collection indicate, Osborne worked the mines yearly to maintain his claims according to federal mining law. Reports by mining engineers gave enough promise of possible discoveries to maintain interest over a long period of time. The property was leased to several operators, including L.L. Patrick and Tom McCormac but after Osborne's death in 1918 the lessees withdrew and the mine was closed. Production resumed after World War II but closed permanently in the early 1950s.


Im not quite that hardcore, but this information comes from the University of Nevada at Reno's archives. Supposed to have 100 or so pics of the area from the 1900's if someone want to look through them
www.library.unr.edu...

posted on 28-7-2004 at 19:41 Post Number: 694021 (post id: 714715)
Wish I had found this before I sent off the FOIA requests:

quote:
Apparently the Air Force "operating location near Groom Lake" has no official name that is not classified. However, the land which the operating location occupies was officially referred to as that withdrawn by Public Land Order (PLO) 1662 until the military lands withdrawal act of 1999 rescinded PLO 1662 per § 3011(b)(2)(A). As far as the United States government is concerned, there is no "Area 51." Should you submit correspondence to the government concerning the operating location, do not refer to it as "Area 51." Refer to it as "the United States Air Force operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada on land originally withdrawn by Public Land Order 1662," and you will not foreclose the possibility of receiving a meaningful response

www.geocities.com...

posted on 28-7-2004 at 19:44 Post Number: 694025 (post id: 714719)
More Timeline Information

Silver was discovered in 1864 and worked occasionally until the early 1870s when, because of its isolation, the mine was abandoned

The United States military was not active in the Groom Lake ara until 1940, when President Roosevelt signed executive order 8578 establishing the Las Vegas Bombing and Gunnery Range, what is today the Nellis Air Force Range. Roosevelt withdrew 3.5 million acres of land from the civilian public domain to create the range, making it the largest military range in the Western world.


posted on 28-7-2004 at 19:49 Post Number: 694032 (post id: 714726)
Area 51 name for the DOE and My take on the name issue

The Department of Energy seems to refer to the base as "Area 51" the link is to a bad copy of a memo about Dead Cattle in "Area 51". Kind of have to wonder 1) how they got all the way there, and 2) what killed them?
www.geocities.com...

Also Kelly Johnson at the chalkboard from a clip taken from "Kelly's Way" a video they used to show at the Edwards Museum clearly shows a reference to Area 51
www.geocities.com...

So here is my name theory. Perhaps part of the security plan is that it does not have an offical designation. That would simplify denials. Each agency then has given the area its own "nickname" that would explain why there are so many?? What do you think?


posted on 29-7-2004 at 01:57 Post Number: 694359 (post id: 715053)
One interesting tidbit has come up. The Nevada Test Site seems to only have numbered areas from 1-26. No 27-50. I am trying to get more inormation on this. I had always assumed that the 51 was a reference to fallout grids.


posted on 29-7-2004 at 02:07 Post Number: 694375 (post id: 715069)
The Lawsuits

Each year since the Clinton Adminstration, the sitting president signs a law that in effect grants Area 51/Groom Lake and exemption from environmental laws. This is unique in that the base is only part of the US that is exempted. Part of this stems from lawsuits brought by families who's husbands died from some type of toxic exposure while working at Groom. If you look at the Russian sat. picture from 1967, you can see smoke comming from the south side of the base were an open pit is burning. The suits never went anywere because the courts ruled in favor of the governments ability to classify the area. The cases were Kasza v. Browner and Frost v. Perry. Below is a synopsis of the legal action against the Government regarding Groom.
hamburgsteak.sandwich.net...

And here is an actual copy of a exemption signed by Clinton
www.kool-breeze.net...

It is interesting to note that the presidential memo referres to the area as: the Air Force's Operating Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada. Not an actual name.

[edit on 13-8-2004 by ADVISOR]


reply posted on 29-7-2004 @ 11:07 AM by ghost
Originally posted by FredT
The Department of Energy seems to refer to the base as "Area 51" the link is to a bad copy of a memo about Dead Cattle in "Area 51". Kind of have to wonder 1) how they got all the way there, and 2) what killed them?
www.geocities.com...

Also Kelly Johnson at the chalkboard from a clip taken from "Kelly's Way" a video they used to show at the Edwards Museum clearly shows a reference to Area 51
www.geocities.com...

So here is my name theory. Perhaps part of the security plan is that it does not have an offical designation. That would simplify denials. Each agency then has given the area its own "nickname" that would explain why there are so many?? What do you think?

[edit on 29-7-2004 by FredT]


Good theory! I never though of that, but it makes scense. If you want to hide something, why stick a big official lable on it? I think we 'll go with that unless something to the contrary turns up. So I guess it's a case of call it whatever you want to, it's the base at Groom Lake. Maybe the only offical designation is the radio call sign of the base's control tower: Dreamland. The reason I say that is Call Signs are standardized so everyone knows who's on the radio. What do you think if we list that as the "offical designation" ALONG WITH a note stating that it is a Call Sign and NOT an official name? I say that because federal regulations require all aircrafts and all ground stations to have a standard call sign for Air Traffic Control and ID Purposes. What do you think?

Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance


reply posted on 29-7-2004 @ 11:36 AM by ghost
Originally posted by FredT
This document essential IMHO kicks the CIA out of the SIGINT business and installs the NSA. The NSA in turn has to be responsive CIA requests for info. Dated in 1976. It is reasonable to assume that the CIA would have to turn over any air based sigint assests it owned at the time. Perhaps this is the entry point of the NSA to area 51??

www.gwu.edu...


I think so! SIGINT is considered so secret that it has it's own classification system that Falls under the subgroup Sensitive Compartmentalized Information (SCI). SCI exists above the level of Top Secret. We know the NSA has air based SIGINT assets, usually flown by the CSS(see earilier posts). Where would you hide the most secret spy planes in the USA? Area 51 of course! with today's real time data links, there is no need to have a data processing facility out at Groom Lake, you can sent the data directly from the aircraft to NSA headquaters near Fort Mead in real time via. Satellite link. All they would need at Groom Lake is hangers and maintainence facilities for the planes, and that was already there!

Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^