It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why would judges, which are in a completely different branch of government, would know if a specific birth record exists in the archives of some separate agency?
Originally posted by filosophia
how do you know the court doesn't know if the document exists or not?
The article you linked is 4 paragraphs long, the court’s opinion is 17 pages. In neither of them is it mentioned the court knows anything about whether the specified record exists or not.
Can you show in the article where it says this or are you just assuming what happened in the court room?
Originally posted by OldCorp
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Originally posted by OldCorp
Originally posted by aptnessThe definition of natural-born citizen the birthers want to use to disqualify Obama, even regardless of were he was born, unquestionably disqualifies McCain. But they don’t have certain ‘feelings’ or ‘suspicions’ about McCain, so they don’t they care about that.
You couldn't be more wrong. John McCain was born on a US military base (Panama Canal Zone) to a US citizen mother and a US citizen father who was serving on active duty at the time. US military bases in other countries are considered our sovereign territory, so he might as well have been born on the Capitol steps.
His mom was born in Kansas and his father born in Kenya and is the 7th POTUS to have at least one parent born on foriegn soil so if it did not apply to them it does not apply to Obama.
OK, that made absolutely NO sense. You must subscribe to the theory that "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh*t." What part of "US military bases in other countries are considered our sovereign territory" do you not understand?
The law applies equally to both McCain and Obama; but the circumstances are different in each case, so the outcome is different as well. You simply don't like the outcome, so you're attempting to obfuscate the issue. You have failed.
Originally posted by brokedown
If Obama was a natural born citizen we would not still be asking the question. Solid proof would have been presented by now.
You don’t keep paying lawyers to keep you out of court when a $14 dollar document can do the very same thing.
Wake up !
It is all just a sham. Sure the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, McCain all know it’s a sham, but they themselves are part of it.
You must still believe there is a difference between Republicans and Decorates.
It is the same beast, the two party system is just diversion.
Originally posted by CalmAsHinduCows
Originally posted by brokedown
If Obama was a natural born citizen we would not still be asking the question. Solid proof would have been presented by now.
You don’t keep paying lawyers to keep you out of court when a $14 dollar document can do the very same thing.
Wake up !
It is all just a sham. Sure the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, McCain all know it’s a sham, but they themselves are part of it.
You must still believe there is a difference between Republicans and Decorates.
It is the same beast, the two party system is just diversion.
Couldn't have said it better. If the certificate existed, it would have been presented the first day or two this came into question. Why have a group of lawyers to guard your past if you have nothing to hide?
Originally posted by CalmAsHinduCows
Couldn't have said it better. If the certificate existed, it would have been presented the first day or two this came into question. Why have a group of lawyers to guard your past if you have nothing to hide?
Originally posted by filosophia
what does "anymore" have to do with now?
www.wnd.com...
Originally posted by CalmAsHinduCows
Why have a group of lawyers to guard your past if you have nothing to hide?
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Due to PATRIOT 2006 all bc's issued before 2005 in circulation were voided and ordered replaced
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Due to PATRIOT 2006 all bc's issued before 2005 in circulation were voided and ordered replaced
Care to show where exactly the Patriot act states that?
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Is your original bc accepted at your local DMV or did you have to apply for a new one?
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Is your original bc accepted at your local DMV or did you have to apply for a new one?
My original,
and once again, Care to show where exactly the Patriot act states that? It appears that it is just something you made up!
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
I do not make things up,
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
REAL ID Act of 2005 orders it.
www.dhs.gov...edit on 13-4-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Sinnthia
why would someone pay for a law suit if the only copy of the birth certificate was the one that was shown online?
I guess your answer will be something along the lines of "birthers don't make sense"