posted on Apr, 8 2011 @ 02:07 PM
Originally posted by Jinglelord
Flight evolved on this planet at least four separate times and five if you want to include human flight. Why is it unreasonable that intelligence and
society evolved separately before ours did? I think the theory of pre-human civilization makes more sense than either extra terrestrial or ancient
Well, they all make sense actually, no need to choose just one path when they all seem to align logically.
The problem with former civs is lack of evidence...however, there is actually tons of evidence suggesting millions (and even a billion) year old
civs...its just not enough (yet) to win a court case one way or another...they are considered anomolies.
The issues here is that any...-any- archeologist whom has suggested the rewrite of history based on findings has immediately been crusified. there are
many stories of people finding groundbreaking things that, instead of making front page science digest, they quickly are silenced, defunded, and their
findings removed by the site owners..
I personally don't understand why. its not like discovering some civilization of...whatever, walking intelligent lizards for instance, existed 300
million years ago (aha, the dinosaurs were hunted to extinction...)will somehow effect anything today beyond some scientists having a nerdgasm over
this new field of research..
Sure, religion would have to deal with yet another blow...but its not like they haven't weathered such stuff before, they will just ignore it, or
incorporate that as part of the story (oh ya...the bible talks about this already...the creation story is actually 2/3rds of a billion years per
So ya...not sure what is holding up the proper unravelling of these artifacts.
Not sure how credible the stone wall thing is mind you...I will need other sources besides some backwoods entertainment and satire website before I
put any thought into it, but the study itself about ancient artifacts is very much real and relevant.