It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TACHYON
Yes anyone can make an attack. Give a girl scout a pack of SARS and even she can launch a massive worldwide germ war. My question was why would anyone do such a thing, and you still dont even have an answer for an agency.
Originally posted by zcheng
The motivation is so obvious, if you have any brain. As I said, even one person can initiate the attack with the virus in a small vial. Do you think China can track all foreigners in China?
Originally posted by zcheng
[Do you know that it is US stated policy not allowing any nation to surpass US? Which nation has the potential in the future?
At that time, US is planning to invade Iraq. What if China start Unification War coincide with the time of US invasion? Is it not good for China concentrated in internal turmoil?
To disrupt Chinese economy, is there a better weapon other than SARS? With SARS attack which can be executed by one or few people, there is little chance of being caught. There is only minimal effect on US. With SARS specifically targeted toward Chinese, Japan and the West do not need to worry. SARS is ultimate weapon, way better than even nukes.
With China affected, would it not good for investment fleeing or diverting from China back to US or the West?
I am so glad that Chinese government contained the attack by mobilizing a new People War against SARS, and realized how evil the West esp. US is. So China can anticipate and prepare future attacks on Chinese people, and reserve right and weapons to fight back when needed.
Originally posted by jazzmaster
All i ask is for you to give us links to the articles of what you are talking about because this accusation is really just an accusation after all. There is no evidence to support your accusation. Take the flu virus for example, they mutate constantly every year, and the genome of it is surely alien, no scientists are sure where they come from. That is also the reason why us in the US have to have a shot each year.
I would guess that who ever wrote those articles know very little about biology. I think the pattern of infection extends around the world too, not just on Chinese. There were a dozen cases in the US at the beginning in which those infected were not Chinese nor Asian, but instead Caucasians, I would think that if this virus were ever man-made, the creator would clearly put "make-virus-for-Chinese-only-not-Caucasians" on his list, don't you think so? I am not sure if some Chinese in the rural part of the country ate some wild animals and contracted the virus from them. Chinese will eat everything they find. The AIDS virus was first contracted from a monkey in Africa.
Originally posted by zcheng
Originally posted by TACHYON
Yes anyone can make an attack. Give a girl scout a pack of SARS and even she can launch a massive worldwide germ war. My question was why would anyone do such a thing, and you still dont even have an answer for an agency.
Do you know that it is US stated policy not allowing any nation to surpass US? Which nation has the potential in the future?
At that time, US is planning to invade Iraq. What if China start Unification War coincide with the time of US invasion? Is it not good for China concentrated in internal turmoil?
To disrupt Chinese economy, is there a better weapon other than SARS? With SARS attack which can be executed by one or few people, there is little chance of being caught. There is only minimal effect on US. With SARS specifically targeted toward Chinese, Japan and the West do not need to worry. SARS is ultimate weapon, way better than even nukes.
With China affected, would it not good for investment fleeing or diverting from China back to US or the West?
I am so glad that Chinese government contained the attack by mobilizing a new People War against SARS, and realized how evil the West esp. US is. So China can anticipate and prepare future attacks on Chinese people, and reserve right and weapons to fight back when needed.
Originally posted by ludahai
Originally posted by jazzmaster
All i ask is for you to give us links to the articles of what you are talking about because this accusation is really just an accusation after all. There is no evidence to support your accusation. Take the flu virus for example, they mutate constantly every year, and the genome of it is surely alien, no scientists are sure where they come from. That is also the reason why us in the US have to have a shot each year.
I would guess that who ever wrote those articles know very little about biology. I think the pattern of infection extends around the world too, not just on Chinese. There were a dozen cases in the US at the beginning in which those infected were not Chinese nor Asian, but instead Caucasians, I would think that if this virus were ever man-made, the creator would clearly put "make-virus-for-Chinese-only-not-Caucasians" on his list, don't you think so? I am not sure if some Chinese in the rural part of the country ate some wild animals and contracted the virus from them. Chinese will eat everything they find. The AIDS virus was first contracted from a monkey in Africa.
The only sources I have ever seen for this nonsense is from the Chinese propoganda machine on Simplified Chinese websites!
Originally posted by jazzmaster
Of course, Zcheng hasn't provided the link to the article that he quoted from. I am sure that the full article says more than South East Asians are more likely to contract the virus.
I have a few questions for you.
1. Are you really Chinese? You do not seem to know much about Chinese and China.
2. Are you some sort of Anti-American or Anti-West lunatic ? (don't mean to be rude but i have to know)
3. Do you live in China? Because you seem out of touch with arguements about China.
Are you willing to look at other people's point when debating or you just want to impose your unreasonable views?
I just want answers to these questions before i and the rest of us debate with you any further. Woop, you are going to put me on your ignored list now, are you not? This is so predictable. I've had it with Zcheng. Who's with me?
Originally posted by jazzmaster
Zcheng, you are just ever so wrong of this topic. Here are a few facts of the outbreak made by the WHO
(source:www.wpro.who.int... )
(And especially this one from your OWN Chinese government: www.wpro.who.int...)
These two additional laboratory workers appear to have suffered from SARS-like illnesses in early February 2004. Recent laboratory tests performed at a national reference laboratory were positive for SARS antibodies.
Originally posted by zcheng
Originally posted by jazzmaster
Zcheng, you are just ever so wrong of this topic. Here are a few facts of the outbreak made by the WHO
(source:www.wpro.who.int... )
(And especially this one from your OWN Chinese government: www.wpro.who.int...)
If you read more carefully, you will know that the investigation is about the recent outbreak occured around Feb 2004, not the original outbreak occured in the spring of 2003 around US invasion of Iraq.
These two additional laboratory workers appear to have suffered from SARS-like illnesses in early February 2004. Recent laboratory tests performed at a national reference laboratory were positive for SARS antibodies.
There was similar incident in Taiwan, and Singapore.
In the course of March 19 to May 22, 2003, 93 cases of suspected SARS were reported by Mackay Memorial Hospital in Taipei City and its branch in Tan Sui County of Taipei to the Center for Disease Control in Taiwan. Up until early June, among 680 probable SARS cases reported in Taiwan,
Taiwan population is heterogeneous and comprises 91% Taiwanese, 7.5% Chinese who arrived from many different provinces of China after World War II, and 1.5% of indigenous peoples established there since several millenniums. The Taiwanese comprised the Minnan and Hakka people groups, and are the descendants of early settlers from the southeast coast of China (Fujian and Guangdong Provinces) during the last few centuries
Density of populations possibly favored the growth of the epidemic.
The question aroused as to whether affected southern Asian populations were more susceptible to SARS infection than peoples of northern China (Beijing), Japan, or Korea. Many peoples in Beijing generally considered as northern Chinese [16], were also infected, however, infection in Beijing could be attributed to heterogeneity of populations following important recent migration of southern Chinese and population resettlement during the Cultural Revolution.
Originally posted by jazzmaster
In that case, from the link to the article you have provided tells us that the first cases were also reported in Taiwan. Did China mean to give the virus to Taiwanese too?
And you said that the attack was on China, if this virus was deadly as scientists claimed, then this "stunt" pulled by the West could have killed the whole population of Taiwan. Therefore it is also unreasonable because that would give China a big advantage in the war, would it not?
Taiwan population is heterogeneous and comprises 91% Taiwanese, 7.5% Chinese who arrived from many different provinces of China after World War II, and 1.5% of indigenous peoples established there since several millenniums. The Taiwanese comprised the Minnan and Hakka people groups, and are the descendants of early settlers from the southeast coast of China (Fujian and Guangdong Provinces) during the last few centuries
I also notice that this article is written by Taiwanese, not the Chinese
Not only Taiwan was affected, but also Hong Kong, Vietnam, Singapore, Toronto. It is the infectious nature of SARS, with large travelling between these places. You still do not want to admit that these places are populated by people of Chinese origin?
The West media cried then about the lethality of the virus. I guess they knew beforehand.
This is one of the statistics. I am wondering where that 91% Taiwanese came from, and how they determine who is Chinese or Taiwanese. Chinese people came from different origin over the thousands of years. SARS targets one section of Chinese people with a particular allele in their genes. Considering the mixed nature of US population, it is not possible to engineer a virus to target all US people.
616 persons per square kilometer, making it the second highest in the world after Bangladesh www.roc-taiwan.org...
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Z - you can believe whatever you want (well, at least in America you can, I don't know if that is aplicable to China ), but I have to tell you dude, you are really reaching here.
Originally posted by jazzmaster
My point is, not only SARS targets Asians, it targets one of the most populated region on Earth. Also you failed to mention that SARS also infected London, the Philippines, and Mongolia
Originally posted by zcheng
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Z - you can believe whatever you want (well, at least in America you can, I don't know if that is aplicable to China ), but I have to tell you dude, you are really reaching here.
You are indeed a Mad Man.
Originally posted by sanctum
SARS in Oz.
www.mja.com.au...
www.diaspoir.net...
antisars.qianlong.com...@1825891.htm
Sanc'.
Originally posted by zcheng
Originally posted by jazzmaster
My point is, not only SARS targets Asians, it targets one of the most populated region on Earth. Also you failed to mention that SARS also infected London, the Philippines, and Mongolia
In acient times, Vietnam was a vasal state of China (called An Nan), esp. in the North. There were intimate interaction between the two population, so is today.
India, Japan may have higher population density.
Can you provide more information about SARS infections in London, the Philippines, and Mongolia? I want to know who were affected and how serious they were. Appreciated.
In acient times, Vietnam was a vasal state of China (called An Nan), esp. in the North. There were intimate interaction between the two population, so is today.