Everything is ok - BANNED - Police, Camera, Action(Video)

page: 2
71
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 06:48 AM
link   
reply to post by petdog82
 


Brilliant


There should be a police doing dumb crap thread.



Actually it's pretty funny, there not always total tools.




posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 07:14 AM
link   
reply to post by pazcat
 


If he had have tried that in the USA the camera would have been in pieces on the ground and he would have been Tazed, Pepper Sprayed, Handcuffed and arrested for resisting and fleeing the scene or what ever.They dont need to know the law you are being arrested for here........they can figure out something by the time they get you to the jail.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 07:17 AM
link   
reply to post by lastrebel
 


Exactly, who knows what he was thinking I just think he snapped.
He could of just arrested the bloke instead of playing his game.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by pazcat
reply to post by lastrebel
 


Exactly, who knows what he was thinking I just think he snapped.
He could of just arrested the bloke instead of playing his game.


Arrest him for breaking what law exactly?

The officer broke the law (Assualt) to enforce a policy. I think Danny was within his rights to act as he did.
edit on 30-3-2011 by Namaste1001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   
Demanding that police can cite the law word for word is idiotic. There is endless amounts of laws and the language is like gibberish.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 01:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Namaste1001
 


Well, this would be assuming the officer kept his head instead of making himself look like a turd.
But it is a requirement under section 24 police & criminal evidence act (as amended by the Serious & Organised Crime & Police Act 2006) - powers of arrest to request the dtails of the person.
If he fails to provide his particulars (name & address suitable for summons) then the officer should have considered an arrest at that point.


(5) it is necessary to arrest the person in question..
(5)The reasons are—.
(a)to enable the name of the person in question to be ascertained (in the case where the constable does not know, and cannot readily ascertain, the person's name, or has reasonable grounds for doubting whether a name given by the person as his name is his real name);.
(b)correspondingly as regards the person's address;.


www.legislation.gov.uk...

I'm not defending what the cop did, just proposing an alternative way it could of been handled.
The cyclist was clearly one smart arse too many that day for the PC and got the exact reaction he was going for I imagine.
edit on 30-3-2011 by pazcat because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   
While this is highly entertaining the cyclist did actually commit an offence. He went through a red light, He could of caused an accident, he could of been killed or could of caused the deaths of another person. Don't mean to ruin the party but you can't really lay the blame entirely on that copper!



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by MrHappyman989
 


I have to agree with the poster above...laugh at the policeman all you want, the cyclist still ran a red light.

He could easily have been hit by another car, thus injuring himself and distressing the driver of the car, I don't think I'd fancy being the driver who killed a cyclist, even if it was his fault.

And as another said, expecting the police to remember every word of every law? Thats just sheer stupidity, they are still human after all.

Yes the policeman may have handled it wrong, but I have no sympathy for the cyclist either...he simply weasled his way out of comitting a crime, and we are cheering him for it...



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 02:35 PM
link   
That cyclist is an idiot.
I actually think the copper showed quite a lot of restraint! If it were me I would have prob smacked the guy.
It is NOT funny when people wind the police up that much and then get all upset because the person snapped. All he did was go to grab the camera! He could have just smacked him in his cocky chops.
Even the most placid and professional copper would struggle with some donkey like that Danny behaving like that.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 02:36 PM
link   
reply to post by MrHappyman989
 


Well I have to disagree with the above poster, for the simple fact that we have zero evidence that any offence was committed, and only PC Stouts assurance to go by.

Love this guy he is an all round class act. Particularly his comments at the end of the video.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 02:42 PM
link   
Made my day.....lol......that puppet on a string was really trying to get some words out but he just couldn't find the right ones to say....lol...



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 02:49 PM
link   
Classic! That was very educational in my opinion. The OP had him frustrated because he knew he couldnt win and backed himself into a hole.....wow that was so funny...and sad...



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 03:26 PM
link   
Love this stuff, and the site wearechange Here, has some of these vids as well as some other good info and encouragement.
Here are a few more for the mix:




Peace,
spec



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 04:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Big Raging Loner
 


The cyclist never denies riding the red light, he simply refuses to take the ticket...thus accepting he does actually need one in the first place. If he felt he hadn't gone through a red light, I'm sure he would have used the policemans lack of proof as a further angle in his argument.

Instead he simply tried to get out of receiving a ticket by refusing to take one or give his details. Not a direct admittal of guilt, but not denying the accusation either.


(sorry if thats wrong, I'm trying to remember from earlier, I can't watch the video again right now so if he DOES deny, my apologies)
edit on 30-3-2011 by StevenDye because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Demanding that police can cite the law word for word is idiotic. There is endless amounts of laws and the language is like gibberish.


Demanding that a surgeon can cite his knowledge of medicine is idiotic. See what I did!

We follow the WORD of the law. That's why it was written. If they can't cite it, then is it really there? If he can't tell you what law was broken, then no law was broken.

Thanks for sharing that vid OP. I gotta hand it to PC Stout, he didn't actually "lose" his cool. I think he knew he was beat and that's why he didn't bother chasing him. I mean come on.......failure to stop on a bicycle?



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 05:42 PM
link   
i'd be happy if there was a law where the police can beat irritating cyclist's around the head with their own camera's.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
Demanding that a surgeon can cite his knowledge of medicine is idiotic. See what I did!

We follow the WORD of the law. That's why it was written. If they can't cite it, then is it really there? If he can't tell you what law was broken, then no law was broken.

Thanks for sharing that vid OP. I gotta hand it to PC Stout, he didn't actually "lose" his cool. I think he knew he was beat and that's why he didn't bother chasing him. I mean come on.......failure to stop on a bicycle?



Yes it is idiotic, ever go to a doctors and see all the medical books...I wonder why that might be, doctors have to look things up all the time, especialy when diagnosing medication..I wonder why there are specialists in certain areas. It is because the human brain can't hold that much information.

Similarly, a Surgeon may be able to perform an operation wihtout remembering the exact wording of the 'training manual' he first read about it in, whilst a police officer may know something is against the law whilst not knowing the exact wording of said law.

Also surgeons can make mistakes just as the police can.

So really, I don't see the point in your referring to surgeons... because they wont remember the exact wording in their medical textbook for every operation they ever perform either...doesn't mean they arn't a good surgeon.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 06:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrHappyman989
While this is highly entertaining the cyclist did actually commit an offence. He went through a red light, He could of caused an accident, he could of been killed or could of caused the deaths of another person. Don't mean to ruin the party but you can't really lay the blame entirely on that copper!





I understand what your saying but being a cyclist myself, going through a red light on a bike is totally different from doing it in a car.
I always slow down when the lights are on red to make sure its all clear then i pedal across.
It`s not like you go through doing twenty or so miles an hour so its unlikely that i`m gonna cause an accident.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 06:24 PM
link   
reply to post by pazcat
 


The Officer is not the brightest bulb on the planet, but the guy making the video is a complete Ass. He' probably a hero to children raised by bad parents and adults with childish minds, but in reality he's just another jerk on a bicycle, making video's for attention.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 06:28 PM
link   
It just occurred to me that this video could be shown to a Judge and guarantee a harsh punishment


What is not funny is the reason he was pulled over. Running Stop Lights and Stop Signs kills lots of people. It's not funny at all. The fine should be very high and anyone doing it should be fined, bicycle or car. He could have easily caused an innocent persons death.





new topics
top topics
 
71
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join