It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the fact that they dont listen and just say oops is insane. its like haveing a bomb in your basement powering your house when the wind or other alternitave energies do just fine, ok so no big accidents happen with nuclear energy here.
Originally posted by the owlbear
It's about profit. Pure and simple. My brother in law works in the US navy as a nuke tech on a sub. He just posted some link on Facebook from some guy who works in the nuclear energy industry who claimed if the DIESEL generators had worked, we wouldn't be talking about Japanese reactors. Talk about passing the buck! Later, he claimed that only 20% of power could be generated from "green" sources "on a good day". The question I posited was "why should we trust anyone's figures for energy output when they themselves work for the FOR PROFIT nuclear (or petro, or coal) energy industries?" That energy would cut into their bottom line and their paychecks. What incentive do they have to tell the truth? Just some questions...
The provincial standard for tritium in drinking water is 7,000 becqerels per litre, though the Ontario Drinking Water Advisory Council has recommended a substantial reduction, to 20 becquerels per litre.
Ontario Power Generation will launch an investigation after a swimming pool’s worth of water containing trace amounts of radioactive material leaked into Lake Ontario from a Pickering nuclear plant.
if the hatter knew what Mercury did before he made the hats dont you think he would have used something else?
we live and then we learn and now is a good time to learn from what we have lived.
edit on 16-3-2011 by m.red because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by m.red
reply to post by west686
national post says there is trace amounts of radioactive material.
the rods sit in a bay of water to cool them down, this is that water.
the water contains 6 to 10 Becquerel of hydrogen3 per liter
safe drinking water is 7000 Becquerel per liter
- 73,000 liters times say 6-10 Becquerel =438,000 to 730,000 Becquerel
730,000 divided by 7,000 so like 100 liters of highly contaminated water dispersed into 73,000 liters
ok the real math by their numbers (if they are honest) is a drop in the bucket
sorry for over hyping but that is my lake where i fish and swim and bring my kids so i have a right to be concerned until i get answers
and i have answered myself.
thank you all.
i do find it weird that they want to change the amount to 20 Becquerel cause if that were true then the numbers would be way off.
at 7,000 becquerel its 0.0014% contaminated
at 20 becquerel its 50% contaminated
so it all depends what they say is safe and thats a big difference.
The provincial standard for tritium in drinking water is 7,000 becqerels per litre, though the Ontario Drinking Water Advisory Council has recommended a substantial reduction, to 20 becquerels per litre.
Ontario Power Generation will launch an investigation after a swimming pool’s worth of water containing trace amounts of radioactive material leaked into Lake Ontario from a Pickering nuclear plant.
national post
edit on 16-3-2011 by m.red because: (no reason given)