It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 2012king
dont get me wrong, i like the idea of everybody getting along, but as long as there are so many different religions thats never going to happen. the slightest variations in peoples view of the truth has caused way too many problems throughout history.
do you mind if i ask what it is you have seen to make you such a strong believer? to me it is the same as people who have beliefs in ghosts and extra terrestrials etc. i believe that the universe is such a big place the chances of there being no other intelligent life out there at all is zero. however i personally have never seen any solid proof of this. same with ghosts, many people claim to have seen them, and i would like to think they are not just hallucinating but again, i have seen no solid proof myself. now we get to god, in whatever form, and again many people claim to have had visions, or experiences but i have seen no solid proof. in reality i could blame the current events going on all over the world on ghosts but that wouldnt make any sense now would it...... and please dont reply with " god is everything and everywhere" as this is simply not the case.
Originally posted by 2012king
... and please dont reply with " god is everything and everywhere" as this is simply not the case.
Originally posted by 2012king
can i just ask something... if god is all loving and giving etc. and he wants us to all live happily and safely together why has he not given an instruction booklet of how the earth should work the way he wants it to? in my opinion if somebody says god is punishing people for not behaving/living how he wants would that not make him more of a dictator figure? lets be honest if he is, not only is he a nasty piece of work, he also has a mass of weapons of mass destruction at his disposal. if he existed and wanted peace on earth surely he would ensure this happened. thats why i dont believe in a "god".
If God exists,I think that we can rest assured that he is no damned liberal.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by 2012king
Dont fixate on the story. You are right, the Bible is not the literal word for word truth. Dont let people with a mistaken fanatical belief make you close your mind to the possibility that SOME of the Bible contains truth.
Not everyone who calls themselves religious knows God. Jesus discussed this, that many would think they knew him and would be surprised to find at the end they did not. So do not base your acceptance or rejection of ANY spiritual message on what other people tell you about that message. They could be wrong.
Take it in, and run it past the spirit of truth within you. If there are parts of the Bible you just KNOW are false, you may well be right. There are parts of the Bible that have nothing to do with God. But dont shut yourself off from the parts that are good, Jesus has some things to say any human being could benefit from. Regardless what they believe.
edit on 18-3-2011 by Illusionsaregrander because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 2012king
dont get me wrong, im sure there is some truth in there, there is with nearly every story, its just the whole creation part of it that doesnt make sense. not with all of the scientific discoveries that have pretty much disproven a lot of it. im sure jesus was a real person, and a very good story teller/magician maybe. that doesnt make him any more of a normal human being than the rest of us. maybe he just had a good way of making people think he was something special when if fact he was just another person like you and me. i hear a lot of people saying that you have to see to believe, but they wont actually say what they have seen as they know they will be ridiculed for it by any non believers. in the same way people who say they have been abducted by UFOs are ridiculed by people who dont believe. if the truth is so important to everybody, why not just share it so everybody can get a perspective of what they have seen?
Originally posted by IAMIAM
Because words cannot describe it.
Originally posted by 2012king
Originally posted by IAMIAM
Because words cannot describe it.
if words cannot describe it, how do you describe it to yourself without using words? you must have interpreted it in a certain way to understand it?
Originally posted by 2012king
. i hear a lot of people saying that you have to see to believe, but they wont actually say what they have seen as they know they will be ridiculed for it by any non believers.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Originally posted by 2012king
. i hear a lot of people saying that you have to see to believe, but they wont actually say what they have seen as they know they will be ridiculed for it by any non believers.
You cant. You cant share that experience perfectly with another person. If that were possible, everyone who could would share it. Unfortunately, because humans are imperfect, and because our language is imperfect, the more you talk about God in specifics, the more you screw it up.
The best you can do, really, is to tell people how to position themself to see for themself.
Have an open mind and heart. Dont believe or disbelieve. Ask to be shown the truth, and then open your eyes and look, patiently.
You dont need another human being to negotiate your relationship with God. You just need to not lock down your mind and heart. Keep it open, ask to be shown, and then watch and listen with that same open heart. It may take time. Not because you are not being answered, but because it takes time to learn to see and hear when you have been trained to obey and believe.
Originally posted by bogomil
But not really understanding your perspective on 'original sin', I'm at a loss here. Did you imply some new-age method, where things go through an ideological blender and come out homogenized, so 'original sin'-based methodology is similar to buddhistic 'dualism'-based methodology.
Originally posted by bogomil
Or did you mean the same initial situation viewed from two opposite perspectives. As far as I can see, there exist few (if any) religious doctrines so judgemental as 'original sin', whereas the original buddhist 'dualism' perspective is pretty neutral on the condemnation side.
1. THEN was not non-existent nor existent: there was no realm of air, no sky beyond it.
What covered in, and where? and what gave shelter? Was water there, unfathomed depth of water?
2 Death was not then, nor was there aught immortal: no sign was there, the day's and night's divider.
That One Thing, breathless, breathed by its own nature: apart from it was nothing whatsoever.
3 Darkness there was: at first concealed in darkness this All was indiscriminated chaos.
All that existed then was void and form less: by the great power of Warmth was born that Unit.
4 Thereafter rose Desire in the beginning, Desire, the primal seed and germ of Spirit.
Sages who searched with their heart's thought discovered the existent's kinship in the non-existent.
5 Transversely was their severing line extended: what was above it then, and what below it?
There were begetters, there were mighty forces, free action here and energy up yonder
6 Who verily knows and who can here declare it, whence it was born and whence comes this creation?
The Gods are later than this world's production. Who knows then whence it first came into being?
7 He, the first origin of this creation, whether he formed it all or did not form it,
Whose eye controls this world in highest heaven, he verily knows it, or perhaps he knows not.
Originally posted by bogomil
Such postulates are easy to make from behind a computer. Considerably more difficult or impossible, living in a KZ-camp.
Originally posted by bogomil
Unconditional acceptance of WHAT. Not that I want to deny your direction or good intentions, but I question your competence to put forth such absolute answers.
Originally posted by bogomil
A position is eventually as numbing as any doctrine or predigested answer.
Especially if fixed elements like this are introduced..
Originally posted by bogomil
God? GOD? Where did he come from, in this open-end search, with no pre-arranged parameters.
Originally posted by bogomil
Strangely enough, I also have had 'direct experience' (so we can have a merry little 'holier-than-you' competition or you can ignore it), but my direct experience didn't have any 'god' in it.
Originally posted by bogomil
Actually I believe, that the presence of any kind of 'god' whatsoever would have imploded my 'direct experience'.