It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the court, said Congress set up a special vaccine court to handle such claims as a way to provide compensation to injured children without driving drug manufacturers from the vaccine market. The idea, he said, was to create a no-fault system that spares the drug companies the costs of defending against parents' lawsuits.
news.yahoo.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">Such was the case for Robalee and Russell Bruesewitz of Pittsburgh, who filed their lawsuit after the vaccine court rejected their claims for compensation. According to the lawsuit, their daughter, Hannah, was a healthy infant until she received the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine in April 1992. The vaccine was made by Wyeth, now owned by Pfizer, Inc.
Such was the case for Robalee and Russell Bruesewitz of Pittsburgh, who filed their lawsuit after the vaccine court rejected their claims for compensation. According to the lawsuit, their daughter, Hannah, was a healthy infant until she received the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine in April 1992. The vaccine was made by Wyeth, now owned by Pfizer, Inc.
Originally posted by kwakakev
Sounds like the eugenics program is stepping up a gear. It has been know for some time that there is a risk with vaccinations and when you look at the long term data the risks are greater than the benefits. This move to impede liability and compensation looks to be in defence of the corporations, yet again. How do we turn this situation around when the processes that are suppose to put balance back into the conflicts just shut their doors to it?
Originally posted by kwakakev
It has been know for some time that there is a risk with vaccinations and when you look at the long term data the risks are greater than the benefits.